Started By
Message

re: Pravda column on gun control in America

Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259906 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

beat me to it Roger... i was gonna say for him to look in the mirror, cause it's a clear cut case of "the pot calling the kettle black"..



Yeah, I deal with these wanna be intellectuals all the time. They honestly believe they are the one "informed" people in the world on pretty much any subject.


Posted by El Josey Wales
Greater Geismar
Member since Nov 2007
22710 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Additionally, if you think I'm ignorant, then what's the rest of the voting nation?


That's easy. Ignorant. Look at the last election.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:38 pm to
ok,,, y'all do what u want to.. i have decided to put "cooty boy" on ignore for as long as i can remember. some times, that's not too long...
anyway, he can troll himself..
Posted by 4X4DEMON
NWLA
Member since Dec 2007
11957 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:40 pm to
all those beautiful guns
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:41 pm to
Love how he shows up in the gun post alone and then wants to play OB police and have it move to the poli board.
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
3948 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Yeah, I deal with these wanna be intellectuals all the time.


You're making me blush.


I'll challenge most on this board to step out of your comfort zone and talk to people that have a different opinion.
The result may surprise you.

It's kinda what makes this country great.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259906 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:47 pm to

quote:



I'll challenge most on this board



Hold on chief. This board isn't one communal unit.

quote:

to step out of your comfort zone and talk to people that have a different opinion.


I do it every day.

quote:

The result may surprise you.


No, they are fairly predictable, as you are.



Let me ask you some questions.

1) What is our "gun" problem?

2) What is the best fix?

3) What are the positives of this fix?

4) What are the potential negatives of this fix?

5) Do the positives outweigh the negatives?





Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
3948 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Let me ask you some questions.

1) What is our "gun" problem?

2) What is the best fix?

3) What are the positives of this fix?

4) What are the potential negatives of this fix?

5) Do the positives outweigh the negatives?


I wish I had the answers to all of these questions. I'll give you an opinion on each, but I (by myself) simply don't have the capacity or experience to effectively resolve our problem.

At least you acknowledge that we do have a gun problem.

I'll go ahead and bite to make you happy...
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259906 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:00 pm to
quote:


I wish I had the answers to all of these questions. I'll give you an opinion on each, but I (by myself) simply don't have the capacity or experience to effectively resolve our problem.


There you go. You are one of "us." Be careful about judging others for "not being informed enough" when you aren't either.

quote:

At least you acknowledge that we do have a gun problem.


I didn't. The "gun" problem is hypothetical.

quote:


I'll go ahead and bite to make you happy...


Amused, so yes..probably happy.

This perceived problem has a tradeoff of perceived safety and security vs liberty and freedom. It also has the potential of creating a huge and deadly black market which may make your "security and safety" less likely than you think.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

creating a huge and deadly black market which may make your "security and safety" less likely than you think.
roger, go back a ways and click my link about australia.
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29268 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

FYI Deacon, I clicked on this thread because you usually post something of substance. You have a history, in my opinion, of being a pretty solid poster.


This undermines all credibility you may have. I have no substance at all. I am full of hot air and general bullshite.

Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:15 pm to
seconded..

motion carries...

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
259906 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

roger, go back a ways and click my link about australia.


Got it...

People who generally think themselves wiser (by virtue of daddy's money, liberal arts degree and a JD in progress) fall into the same trap they abhor, which is a minefield littered with cultural and confirmation biases...and think their small world view has all the answers.

None of us do, but we can raise enough legitimate questions that makes their simple world view a little more complex. They'll just call you a redneck and move on in the end.

Posted by El Josey Wales
Greater Geismar
Member since Nov 2007
22710 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:19 pm to
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
3948 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:19 pm to
1) What is our "gun" problem?
A) A national lack of respect, understanding, and experience with guns is our single largest problem. If we all had a basic level of competence/respect, it would be easier to agree upon the rest of the issues surrounding gun control. People would also safeguard their guns in a better fashion, preventing accidents and theft. We would also have fewer handling accidents.
B) Certain people shouldn't have access to guns. There should be clear and explicit laws in place to license ownership and regulate that ownership.
I think there should be a particular licensing procedure for all guns (to ensure that gun owners are at least educated about their weapons and receive proper training).
I can't draw the line about who should or shouldn't have guns and what types of guns...I'll leave that for brighter minds.
(C) Certain guns should not be accessible to certain people. Higher capacity weapons should require more education/stricter licensing.

2) What is the best fix?
-This is the toughest of the questions, there is no one easy fix. There are so many guns illegally owned and available that no matter what we program we implement, it'll take a few generations to actually have any impact.
Nonetheless, we should implement what I have described in question 1. However, we need to keep the special interest groups out and take a level headed approach in our legislature. It needs to be a good faith effort by gun advocates and those against gun possession to work together to create a system that provides proper access to guns.

3) What are the positives of this fix?
-In time, fewer and more isolated gun related incidents. That's the goal, to reduce violence. You can't end it, but you can try to minimize it. I repeat, the goal of many liberals is to reduce violence, that's it.
This part assumes that we can agree that guns give a person a higher capacity for violence than a knife because they could do more damage in less time. Thus, by reducing the capacity for mass violence, reducing violence.

4) What are the potential negatives of this fix?
-Some people won't have access to particular guns.


5) Do the positives outweigh the negatives?
In time, if we all took an active role on educating and monitoring, we would see fewer and more isolated incidents. It would take some time, like generations.
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 2:22 pm
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29268 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:19 pm to
You didn't have to be so quick to agree.
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
3948 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

This undermines all credibility you may have. I have no substance at all. I am full of hot air and general bullshite.



Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:22 pm to
Stewie how about you tell us what you think for once instead of telling us how we're wrong for how we do.

It's intellectual cowardice otherwise. And you're not the only one that enjoys debating things in order to test our own theories. Thrill us.
Posted by stewie
Member since Jan 2006
3948 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:22 pm to

Faxis - See my post above...

I'll assume that you did not read it when you posted this.
This post was edited on 1/10/13 at 2:24 pm
Posted by wickowick
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
45794 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

5) Do the positives outweigh the negatives?
In time, if we all took an active role on educating and monitoring, we would see fewer and more isolated incidents. It would take some time, like generations.


but aren't we currently seeing fewer and more isolated incidents? Take a look at the crime stats. So if the current laws and behaviors in America are getting the results you already want why does anything need to change?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram