- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Legal-Bayou Bridge Pipeline decision
Posted on 5/2/18 at 2:40 pm to CharleyLake
Posted on 5/2/18 at 2:40 pm to CharleyLake
Used domestically and "benefit" can be different.
1
Posted on 5/2/18 at 4:17 pm to Marlbud
Typically they are different, I suspect. The Texas law suits seemingly are another approach to challange the notion that the exportation of crude oil is a public and paramount beneficiary or an avenue to line the pockets of the shareholders of the pipeline company.
Posted on 5/2/18 at 4:58 pm to CharleyLake
They won't go anywhere. I guess what I was saying without saying it is the product doesn't have to be consumed or refined in in the US for the carrier to be granted common carrier status. Thus, the right of eminent domain.
Posted on 5/3/18 at 7:36 am to Marlbud
I understand what you are saying and do agree that they will not get too far like beyound the district courts.
Do you think that the high court will ever reconsider the Kelo decision?
Do you think that the high court will ever reconsider the Kelo decision?
Posted on 5/3/18 at 8:28 am to CharleyLake
quote:
the exportation of crude oil is a public and paramount beneficiary or an avenue to line the pockets of the shareholders of the pipeline company.
So you're telling me the debate here is whether pipeline's are the most efficient way to get a liquid from their source to the place where we have to do work on them and then to the place where they are sold....as opposed to something like trucks I guess.
dumb debate.Posted on 5/3/18 at 9:13 am to CharleyLake
Yes, it will be overturned in time but it will be to limit the practice of expropriation, not eliminate.
25 years ago pipeline companies didn't give two shits whether they reached a deal with the landowner or not. The railroad was even worse! Today, they will do almost anything to avoid litigation.
25 years ago pipeline companies didn't give two shits whether they reached a deal with the landowner or not. The railroad was even worse! Today, they will do almost anything to avoid litigation.
Posted on 7/8/18 at 11:02 am to Marlbud
Construction will be able to continue. A 2-1 decision of the 5th U.S. Court of Appeals reversed the district court's ruling that favored the envioronmental groups.
Posted on 7/24/18 at 3:50 pm to CharleyLake
They finally got it all filled in over here as far as I can see. 
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News