- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/10/13 at 10:30 am to shooter35
quote:
But I did get a good bit of knowledge of Economics. And it's clear you are lacking in that area
yea because im comparing welfare and food stamps to WRP and Ducks unlimited. I don't know shite. But I bet I could shoot you under the table, and know a whole lot more about duck hunting
Posted on 12/10/13 at 10:32 am to Rod Farva
quote:
You seem mad
lol no. I'm just waiting for you to offer something to the discussion other than "this Tulane guy don't know shite" or asking about "nets and heated ponds."
Posted on 12/10/13 at 10:58 am to shooter35
I don't understand how you see federal aid to conversation programs as the same as healthcare...apples to testicle comparison if you as me..
Posted on 12/10/13 at 10:59 am to shooter35
quote:
I can grow all the food I need to live on my property
But you don't. What about electricity? Medicine? Industries with govt help. There was a reason the folks with the same DNA as you died at 38 just a short while ago.
I know, I know. You got it all figured out. But you don't actually do any of it.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:00 am to Rod Farva
I honestly think this is just the best troll job on the OB to date. I bet this dude doesn't even bait... I bet he doesn't even duck hunt.. I bet he doesn't even lift, bro. 

Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:06 am to NicoBlues
Probably doesn't even jack off
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:30 am to Rod Farva
The USFS Waterfowl laws specifically excludes NORMAL AGRICULTURAL PROCESS in favor of FLOODING STANDING CROPS for waterfowl hunting.
Now, I do not expect you jealous assholes to understand that simple concept, but there it is.
Now, I do not expect you jealous assholes to understand that simple concept, but there it is.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:35 am to Priapus

Read the thread bra. There are a lot of people on both sides of the fence. Dont make blanket statements about jealous assholes. There are a whole lot of people in here that dont have much to be envious about
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:40 am to Priapus
Jealous that they can put water in the corn but I can't put corn in th water? You bet your sweet arse I am.
This post was edited on 12/10/13 at 11:44 am
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:41 am to Capt ST
Are we lifting or fapping in this thread
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:45 am to jimbeam
When i fap, it's considered lifting bro.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:49 am to Rod Farva
quote:
I don't understand how you see federal aid to conversation programs as the same as healthcare...apples to testicle comparison if you as me..
And therein lies the rub. Some people think their particular gubmint cheese is OK, because it accomplishes things that they agree with, while other forms of gubmint cheese are horrific wastes of money. Gubmint cheese is gubmint cheese. Farmer gets $10K for not planting some acreage vs. single mother with 6 children getting $10K in welfare benefits. They both got the cheese.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:52 am to Mung
Well put Mung. I like your style buddy.

Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:55 am to Rod Farva
quote:
don't understand how you see federal aid to conversation programs as the same as healthcare
It's all welfare. No matter how you look at it.
To make the assumption that government conservation programs benefit all hunters is very much the same as saying any welfare, you name it, benefits society as a whole. Yea I could stretch it and say that having food stamps lets more people eat, therefore, less hungry people are less of a burden on society. (same argument for healthcare). It sure as hell don't help a LA hunter to sit next to thousands of acres of conservation land that I helped pay for improvements on and the owner reaps the benefits.
Now if you have no problem with healthcare, food stamps, etc. then that's fine. We agree to disagree. But I don't get how you can be for assistance to one group and not the other. Especially when caring for the poor is a much more "ethical" way to spend tax dollars than making ducky habitat on some guy's land that in all likelihood could have paid for it himself.
It's a fundamental principle that few are willing to admit. They want to cut spending on everyone's shite except their own. Just be man enough to admit it and not try to justify why your use of money is better than the next guy's like most do.
I'll just disagree with most on here I guess. To me conservation programs on private land that I don't have access to hunt is simply hunter's welfare.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 11:56 am to jimbeam
quote:
If you can't set a combine correctly, please turn in your farmers card.
Let me guess, the only spot spilled were where you hunted
Nope. Where we flooded and then hunted 8 days later. I can adjust correctly. In a certain low spot on our fields correctly was not as tight as other spots...
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:00 pm to Fat Neck
quote:
Yankee doodle, leaving a certian amount of grain in field regardless of why it was left is illegal. LDWF and feds can drag a seine through youre' field and get a rough estimate of whay you left in it. Doesnt' matter if it was from a mechanical issue or you hitting the bottle hard and spilling a grain cart. It can be deamed unhuntable by LAW.
Planting a field, not harvesting it, and not manipulating is legal to hunt over. Why? Dont' know, but to me it sure seem that is not a normal ag practice and for all practical purposes be baiting.
Hunting over ANY field recently harvested (within 7 days) is illegal. After that it is game on.
We have had green jeans hunting with us and he did not have an issue. Now if we are running 100% through I can see where there might be an issue, but sloppiness happens. Especially in the low lying areas/
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:06 pm to shooter35
Well there is the well thought out response that you so severely needed to post 2 hours ago. It's like you were slow playing your intelligence for a little while. Either way, I believe we agree on our views of welfare, healthcare, etc. Where I think we differ is that a) we are using one portion of money to feed and supply a group of people that largely abuse the system and contribute nothing to society, while the other portion is going to predominantly good people that work hard to provide a service for our country. Obviously there are some that cheat and take advantage, but comparatively, come on..
b) I like the idea that there is incentive out there to preserve habitat and add woodlands and wetlands to rural America. Otherwise, everything would become commercialized and suburban
b) I like the idea that there is incentive out there to preserve habitat and add woodlands and wetlands to rural America. Otherwise, everything would become commercialized and suburban
Posted on 12/10/13 at 12:52 pm to Capt ST
quote:
Capt. ST

Farmer and welfare mama are both getting paid for doing nothing. Let them both make it without gubmint help. Of course I'd rather see both get paid than see one cent go to the Pakis and Eqgytians, but that's a whole 'nother story.
Having some small experience with baiting regs, i can tell you the Feds can pretty much decide to prosecute or not prosecute based on their whim. Dove regs are different from Duck regs, and the magistrates who try the violations may have zero experience with hunting to interpret the rules. What is a "genuine agricultural practice" to one may not be to another. It sucks, but most err on the side of caution.
Posted on 12/10/13 at 1:07 pm to Mung
quote:. The farmer is doing something though? So I guess I don't understand, he is deferring profits to assist with national conservation initiatives.
Farmer and welfare mama are both getting paid for doing nothing.
Popular
Back to top
