- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Glock 43 & 17 Owners
Posted on 2/8/17 at 9:54 am to Crawdaddy
Posted on 2/8/17 at 9:54 am to Crawdaddy
quote:
3 26 19 17 go for all
\
I'm with this guy! Add the 34 and 17L too just for shitz...
I own 5 or 6 17s, so needless to say it's my fav glock. I carry mine 90% of the time and the 26 the remainder.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:05 am to dawg23
quote:
The G43 and the G26 are much harder to shoot well compared to the G19
I just don't see the point in a 26. If I want a combination of ultra concealment and comfort, I will go with the 43. Otherwise, the 19 is only marginally bigger than the 26, yet offers significantly more. If I'm not carrying the 43, it's the 19.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:11 am to beHop
I have a 17 and 19...no experience with the 43.
As for the 17 it's a fantastic pistol, but I'd just as soon go with the 19 unless you have a really good reason for wanting the full sized pistol.
Whatever you choose, you're on the right track. Can't go wrong with Glock
As for the 17 it's a fantastic pistol, but I'd just as soon go with the 19 unless you have a really good reason for wanting the full sized pistol.
Whatever you choose, you're on the right track. Can't go wrong with Glock
Posted on 2/8/17 at 10:25 am to Damone
quote:
I just don't see the point in a 26.
I like the 26 better for CC than the 43. It's closer to the 43 in size than it is to the 19. The only thing the 43 has better is it's width.
19 - 7.28"L x 4.99"H 15 rounds
26 - 6.41"L x 4.17"H 10 rounds
43 - 6.26"L x 4.25"H 6 rounds
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 10:26 am
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:06 am to jdavid1
You are severely undervaluing the advantage of its width. I think every situation you can carry a 26 you can carry a 19. The 43 becomes useful for those other scenarios. And with a tartan tactical plus one baseplate which adds virtually no length to the grip i can carry 8 rds. For me personally I always carry a 19 but I do also own a 43 which comes in handy for certain dressing occasions or when the risks of being "made" are higher than normal.
To the OP you are this boards hero. Finally someone buying a fullsize gun before going straight for the compact. In regards to the 17 vs 19. I don't think the 17 does anything substantially better than the 19 but I do think the 19 is substantially a better gun if ever trying to conceal so it gets the win in my book.
To the OP you are this boards hero. Finally someone buying a fullsize gun before going straight for the compact. In regards to the 17 vs 19. I don't think the 17 does anything substantially better than the 19 but I do think the 19 is substantially a better gun if ever trying to conceal so it gets the win in my book.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:11 am to Timmayy
quote:
To the OP you are this boards hero.
You're too kind.
Lots of good info, and as I expected, a lot of differing opinions.
Looks like I'm going to just have to see if the 43 or 26 will be my secondary firearm and just weigh the pros and cons of the 17 and 19 as a primary.
Thanks again for all the replies, everyone.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 11:45 am to Timmayy
quote:
You are severely undervaluing the advantage of its width.
Trust me I'm not. The 43 is 1" thick. The 26 is 1.18" thick. That is right at 3/16" of an inch difference. That is not enough difference for me to make up for the four extra rounds the g26 holds.
quote:
I think every situation you can carry a 26 you can carry a 19
How can you say this when the 19 is 7/8" longer and 13/16" taller??? It's almost a full inch longer and taller. I'm not a big guy so I can't carry a 19, but I can carry a 26 easily.
quote:
And with a tartan tactical plus one baseplate which adds virtually no length to the grip i can carry 8 rds
You can do the same thing with the 26 and get +2 extensions. Not to mention you can use 15/17/33 round mags from your other 9mm glocks for backup mags.
I'm not knocking the 43. It's a glock so it's a good gun. I just think there are better options. One being the 26 and the other being a shield. The best thing for the OP to do is go hold them both and make a personal decision based on what works for him. You can't go wrong with a glock 43/26 or 17/19.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 11:57 am
Posted on 2/8/17 at 12:12 pm to Timmayy
quote:
tartan tactical plus one baseplate
These are awesome. Got a +5 for my 19 and a 17 magazine, awesome at the range.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:33 pm to jdavid1
For all of your bashing of the 43 how is the shield any better. Its virtually the same gun. And you can do all the number crunching you want but these are all based on experiences of carrying each gun. I have carried a 19, 26, and 43. To me the 26 became irrelevant. And the saying that someone isn't big enough to carry a 19 is kinda crazy. I know three 160-180 pound guys who carry a 19
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:34 pm to igchris
What's the advantages of the xc-1 over something like the streamlight hl. Is it just because it's surefire or am I overlooking something.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:45 pm to igchris
I appendix carry. I'm not concerned at all with someone being able to take the gun from my holster.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 1:48 pm to Easternrio
That's not what he's saying. He is saying that when in a hand to hand entanglement. When trying to get to his own gun the 43s smaller grip surfaces became harder for him to get ahold of than the 19. I think
Posted on 2/8/17 at 2:37 pm to beHop
I own a couple of 22s, a 27, and a 43. I carried the 27 all the time and never would have bought the 43 except a buddy offered a deal too good to pass up. Now I find myself carrying the 43 daily either in a Milt Sparks IWB or DeSantis ankle holster.
The 43 is a great, incredibly easy to carry gun. Others make great points about the 19, but for me, the 43 is much easier to carry. As for the lack of rounds, I always carry an extra magazine on my person.
The 43 is a great, incredibly easy to carry gun. Others make great points about the 19, but for me, the 43 is much easier to carry. As for the lack of rounds, I always carry an extra magazine on my person.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:01 pm to GreenManalishi
quote:
As for the lack of rounds, I always carry an extra magazine on my person.
That should be a necessity for anyone who carries, but especially with a 43. Neomag FTW
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:26 pm to jdavid1
quote:As was pointed out in another post, you've now made your G26 just as tall as as a G19 -- which is the dimension that most affects concealment. Lots of people who buy G26's end up buying G19's.
You can do the same thing with the 26 and get +2 extensions.
On a semi-related topic (Not referring to jdavid) -- several in this thread seem to be of a mind to look for the littlest 9mm pistol they can find. I think a better thought process is to get a 9mm that (a) holds plenty of ammo and (b) you can shoot well, and then figure out what clothing will conceal it. This may not work for everyone (some people have to wear a certain "uniform" for work), but most folks have options when it comes to attire.
We cannot suspend the laws of physics. A small 9mm is going to be harder to control than a "normal" sized 9mm. And it's gonna hold less ammo.
I do get the part about carrying spare mags. (I carry a spare G17 mag for my G19.) But those who stick spare mages in their pockets, and think they're gonna be able to quickly access them while hiding behind cover (or while driving) are usually kidding themselves. High capacity mags don't necessarily mean you have/need to shoot more -- they mean you'll have to reload less.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:51 pm to Timmayy
quote:
For all of your bashing of the 43
I'm not bashing the 43 at all. I am simply offering my opinion based on my experience. I know everyone is different.
quote:
And you can do all the number crunching you want
Number crunching?? Really? I'm stating the dimensions of the guns. I'm not doing advanced calculus over here.
quote:
I know three 160-180 pound guys who carry a 19
That's good they can do that. I'm 170 and the way I dress for work I don't feel comfortable concealing a 19. I need something a little smaller.
Again, I'm not bashing the 43 or the 19. I think they are both great guns. The 19 is IMO the best all around pistol ever made, and I do carry the 19 during the two weeks of cold weather we get every year.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:55 pm to jdavid1
If you weren't doing number crunching and going off of feel you would know that the 1 inch versus 1.18 inch diffference in width feels entirely misrepresented by what the tape measure shows. In hand and when carrying.
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 2/8/17 at 4:06 pm to Timmayy
I'll agree with you there. It does feel smaller in my hand, but as I said earlier I personally don't think it's enough to give up more rounds in my gun.
ETA:
ETA:
quote:Are we still talking about glocks?
rape measure
This post was edited on 2/8/17 at 4:10 pm
Popular
Back to top


0







