Started By
Message

re: For those of you who have actually hunted whitetail with it… is a 300 Win Mag too much?

Posted on 9/21/24 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by chrome1007
Toledo Bend
Member since Dec 2023
584 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 4:44 pm to
I have a 6.5 Grendel for deer. I save the heavy artillery for elk, Nilgai and moose.
Ammo is a helluva lot cheaper.
Posted by 308
the backwoods of Mississippi
Member since Sep 2020
2972 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 7:46 pm to
Of course a .300 Win Mag is too much for whitetail deer.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
32913 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

Of course a .300 Win Mag is too much for whitetail deer.
quote:

308
Biased.

Opinion denied.
Posted by Out da box
Member since Feb 2018
699 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 9:24 pm to
Louisiana/ Mississippi deer hunting is usually 200 yard shot or less.
Don’t buy a bazooka… 270-308-7.08 are all great and the bullets are plentiful…
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94664 posts
Posted on 9/21/24 at 9:47 pm to
I know you asked "actually hunted" with it and I don't fit the bill, but I would agree that shot placement is going to be critical for meat preservation, period.

So, if you hit more accurately with the cartridge, shoot whitetail with it with the potential risk of it being too much.

On the other hand, you absolutely don't need it. Do you have any idea how many whitetail have been taken with .270 and .30-06 compared to all other cartridges combined (even reasonably high volume deer rounds like .30-30 and .308)? In my opinion, there is a reason for that.

But, I don't know anyone who thinks 300 Win is "too much" for whitetail, unless your shots are going to be inaccurate.

(ETA: I should qualify this with - "at range" - meaning longer shots. I certainly wouldn't stalk with a magnum, which I don't think you're suggesting, but if you're not shooting at least 250, 300, the 300 Win is going to be unpleasant after awhile. Noise, recoil, etc. Most of the above is just about your meat preservation question.)
This post was edited on 9/21/24 at 9:51 pm
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52743 posts
Posted on 9/22/24 at 1:42 pm to
Are you a new shooter too? You don't need a 300 mag
Posted by Theduckhunter
South Louisiana
Member since May 2022
1330 posts
Posted on 9/22/24 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

ETA: I should qualify this with - "at range" - meaning longer shots. I certainly wouldn't stalk with a magnum, which I don't think you're suggesting, but if you're not shooting at least 250, 300, the 300 Win is going to be unpleasant after awhile. Noise, recoil, etc. Most of the above is just about your meat preservation question.)


FWIW I’ve shot an 8pt at 15 yards with a 300 SAUM with negligible meat damage. Of course, it’s not ideal, but just adds to your point that it’s more about shot placement when it comes to meat damage.

Posted by mrcoon
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2019
668 posts
Posted on 9/22/24 at 5:54 pm to
Yes, it is a bad idea.
Posted by Deereman9009a
Prairieville
Member since May 2018
297 posts
Posted on 9/22/24 at 6:16 pm to
Nope, shoot a bonded or monolithic(Copper) bullet. A .270 or .243 ballistic tip will grenade and destroy a ton of meat.
Posted by 308
the backwoods of Mississippi
Member since Sep 2020
2972 posts
Posted on 9/22/24 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Just get a .308 and be done with it.



A voice of wisdom.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
70883 posts
Posted on 9/22/24 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

Yes, it is a bad idea.


It's not bad. It's not the easy button, but it isn't bad.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram