
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/9/26 at 3:38 pm to SeaPickle
Which optics are you running?
Posted on 9/9/26 at 4:24 pm to Train is comin
LINK
And the price keeps going down. I don’t think you can beat it for $1095.
And the price keeps going down. I don’t think you can beat it for $1095.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 9/9/26 at 8:26 pm to Train is comin
Pulsar Thermion 2 XL60
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:41 am to SeaPickle
Nice! How does that compare to the thermion 2 LRF xq50, if you're familiar. Thinking about pulling the trigger on one.
Posted on 9/10/26 at 9:07 am to Train is comin
one is pulsars top top scope and the other is the "weakest" of the thermion line
XL60: 1024 resolution 12 micron sensor, 20mk sensor, 60mm objective lens. higher resolution display screen at the eye
XQ60: 384 resolution 17 micron sensor, 18mk sensor,50mm objective lens: lower resolution display at the eye
ideally, you want the highest resolution, lowest micron and lowest mk sensor. The 1024 resolution is not even comparable to the 384.
The XQ thermion is better than most 384 scopes but its still 384 resolution. (i suggest 640 resolution if you can justify it). A 17 micron sensor isnt my favorite.
The trail 3 XQ50 will have a better (newer) 384, 17 micron sensor and better display screen + a 15 mk sensor. i think is the same price of the xq thermion (id imagine they are phasing out the XQ thermion)
XL60: 1024 resolution 12 micron sensor, 20mk sensor, 60mm objective lens. higher resolution display screen at the eye
XQ60: 384 resolution 17 micron sensor, 18mk sensor,50mm objective lens: lower resolution display at the eye
ideally, you want the highest resolution, lowest micron and lowest mk sensor. The 1024 resolution is not even comparable to the 384.
The XQ thermion is better than most 384 scopes but its still 384 resolution. (i suggest 640 resolution if you can justify it). A 17 micron sensor isnt my favorite.
The trail 3 XQ50 will have a better (newer) 384, 17 micron sensor and better display screen + a 15 mk sensor. i think is the same price of the xq thermion (id imagine they are phasing out the XQ thermion)
Posted on 9/10/26 at 12:40 pm to SeaPickle
Wow, great reply, thanks. 

Popular
Back to top

0








