
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bought My Thermal Scope
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:51 pm
Posted on 9/7/26 at 7:51 pm
Thanks for all the advice. I bought the AGM Rathler V2 25-320 and I love it. Went out last night and it’s amazing what I’ve been missing.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 8:03 pm to Old Man and a Porch
The higher resolution scopes are really nice, but the 320 is all I really need.
Posted on 9/7/26 at 10:04 pm to Old Man and a Porch
Love my AGM. Battery life is great. We usually have an old ipad sitting between us that is connected to the scope. With the rifle in a tripod grip, we just scan and wait for hogs to show up on the ipad. Makes it very easy.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 9:01 am to btforlsu
Have you had to update yours any? Some people have mentioned downloading updates is why I’m asking.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:16 am to Old Man and a Porch
Can you get some pictures from it? I have the AGM TM25-384 monocle and have not been impressed.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:43 pm to billjamin
quote:
Have you had to update yours any?
I have not. I checked mine when i got it in January, and it was running whatever the current version was then. I have not checked since.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 1:51 pm to Old Man and a Porch
I just bought the same one, and my buddy bought the RIX Storm S2. I will say the RIX is very nice. I'm sort of having buyers remorse over the AGM. but that's just initial opinion. unboxing, mounting, link to apps and sighting in. Probably put 10 rounds through each of our rifles. will see how they compare over time.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 2:25 pm to btforlsu
those are both screenshots from the video on my phone. It is a little clearer than that looking into the scope.
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:10 pm to Old Man and a Porch
Awesome thank you. How far away from it do you think you are?
Posted on 9/8/26 at 11:55 pm to billjamin
quote:
Awesome thank you. How far away from it do you think you are?
You have to get really close to get that image. I think I spent around 6k for my thermal a few years ago and still can’t figure out what shite is a few hundred yards away.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 5:22 am to billjamin
If I had to guess 60-70 yards.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:04 am to Rize
quote:
You have to get really close to get that image. I think I spent around 6k for my thermal a few years ago and still can’t figure out what shite is a few hundred yards away.
Damn. I've been wanting to go thermal but i need to be able to tell the difference between a pig, a calf and my SIL's stupid arse dog.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:13 am to billjamin
thermal ID depends on two main things, scope resolution and time behind the scope.
This is why i stress buying a quality optic. Any scope will look "good" at 60 yds in the right conditions.
if you're starting out with 256 resolution, you have nothing left once you start zooming. ID becomes very hard.
- you half the resolution when you double the zoom.
I've been thermal hunting weekly for 6 years. With my helmet mounted monocular with a 1x base i can ID out to 600-700yds. Now this is a 640 resolution quality optic that i have 100s of hours behind
I run a 1024 resolution scope with a 2.5x basemag. I can Id out to 1000 yds no problem
a higher base mag or higher resolution optic allows you to ID further. I demoed 640 resolution 4x power scopes and felt like 1000 yds ID was no problem at all.
Also, regardless of resolution a 12 micron sensor will retain pixels better when zooming than a 17 micron sensor.
quote:
Damn. I've been wanting to go thermal but i need to be able to tell the difference between a pig, a calf and my SIL's stupid arse dog.
This is why i stress buying a quality optic. Any scope will look "good" at 60 yds in the right conditions.
if you're starting out with 256 resolution, you have nothing left once you start zooming. ID becomes very hard.
- you half the resolution when you double the zoom.
I've been thermal hunting weekly for 6 years. With my helmet mounted monocular with a 1x base i can ID out to 600-700yds. Now this is a 640 resolution quality optic that i have 100s of hours behind
I run a 1024 resolution scope with a 2.5x basemag. I can Id out to 1000 yds no problem
a higher base mag or higher resolution optic allows you to ID further. I demoed 640 resolution 4x power scopes and felt like 1000 yds ID was no problem at all.
Also, regardless of resolution a 12 micron sensor will retain pixels better when zooming than a 17 micron sensor.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:50 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 10:23 am to Rize
quote:
You have to get really close to get that image. I think I spent around 6k for my thermal a few years ago and still can’t figure out what shite is a few hundred yards away.
i ran that thermion 2 XP60 for years. Its one of the best 640 scopes out there. It is a 17 micron so the zoomed image was lacking. A few hundred yards should be no issue for that scope
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 10:24 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:36 am to SeaPickle
quote:
Awesome thank you. How far away from it do you think you are?
First pic was 40- 50 yards, second was closer to 100. You can safely id animals out to 150-200 yards no problem with this scope.
Posted on 9/9/26 at 11:39 am to btforlsu
Yeah no doubt you can. On the original thread I said this scope would be fine for shots out to 150. Past that would get difficult to ID
When you have a 1000 acre field of 30 deer and 3 pigs walking through. This scope would struggle looking across at 600 yds to I’d what’s what. I’ve seen it first hand.
When you have a 1000 acre field of 30 deer and 3 pigs walking through. This scope would struggle looking across at 600 yds to I’d what’s what. I’ve seen it first hand.
This post was edited on 9/9/26 at 11:48 am
Posted on 9/9/26 at 12:01 pm to SeaPickle
No doubt. Old Man's original post was asking about lower priced thermals, and I suggested the 320 agm. I knew that it would do everything he wanted without breaking the bank.

Popular
Back to top

4












