Started By
Message

re: Best location for an outdoorsman in the lower 48?

Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:21 pm to
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
104409 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:21 pm to
The OP and most of the posters on this thread seem to mean hunting and fishing when they say outdoorsman. If you include things like hiking, skiing, whitewater, etc, places like CO and the Pacific Northwest move to the top of the list, as does the already reviled CA.
Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
13077 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Visit the Joseph/Enterprise area of Oregon.


That one is penciled in but I haven't really worked the route out to get there.

quote:

Bend is a great jumping off point to the central Oregon Cascades, and you can bet it will be dry. 300 plus days of sun a year.


That's the kind of place I want to retire some day. Mountains and desert both nearby. There are a few places in AZ and UT that I've thought about for that reason.
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16557 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:35 pm to
It all depends on what you consider to be an outdoorsman. Is it hunting/fishing/climbing/hiking/camping/water activities aka rafting/sailing/kayaking. There is is a lot to consider. Hell you can put in motorcycles/biking/running into it to if you really wanted widen the field.

For me I love East Tennessee/West NC. It's a good mix of a little of everything that I love, it's not the best in one area, but its damn near the top in most of them.
This post was edited on 3/1/13 at 12:35 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297469 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:36 pm to
quote:


That's the kind of place I want to retire some day. Mountains and desert both nearby. There are a few places in AZ and UT that I've thought about for that reason.


Joseph/Enterprise is just outside Pendleton. Many Oregon folk agree it's the most underrated area of the state



Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297469 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Is it hunting/fishing/climbing/hiking/camping/water activities aka rafting/sailing/kayaking


In a lot of areas, those activities are a part of the hunting/fishing experience.
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
16557 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

In a lot of areas, those activities are a part of the hunting/fishing experience.


Yeah, but they are individual experiences on their own as people can do those experiences without hunting or fishing. One could hardly argue that John Muir was not an avid outdoorsman even though he was a big advocate for preservation and not so much a friend to hunters.

So having gun control laws or national parks that don't allow hunting may not effect someones opinion of the area because they are not hunters.
This post was edited on 3/1/13 at 12:53 pm
Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
16826 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 12:50 pm to
If I broke it down by Sections of the country:

West: Northern CA ( Sacramento North ) / Washington
Northern - Middle: Montana/Wyoming/Colorado
South: East TN / West NC
North East: ?


Overall though I'd say Montana/Wyoming/Colorado are the ultimate outdoor mans paradise

ETA: The number of homers in this thread is laughable .. I realize this is a LSU website but damn boys
This post was edited on 3/1/13 at 1:27 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297469 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

national parks that don't allow hunting




Unless you are native.
Posted by LSUintheNW
At your mom’s house
Member since Aug 2009
36805 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I'd vote Colorado. World class trout fishing. Elk, mule deer, sheep, mountain goat, and moose in the high country. Antelope, and whitetails in the flatlands. Great hiking all over the state, tons of public land and national forests. Over the counter elk tags. Waterfowl hunting is great in certain areas. Ect.......


The only reason I can't agree is because of the lack of saltwater, otherwise I'd have to agree.

I'd have to say any of the 3 pacific ocean states for an all around good time.
Posted by LSUintheNW
At your mom’s house
Member since Aug 2009
36805 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

West: Northern CA ( Sacramento North ) / Washington


I'd have to say you're missing a state there. Oregon is better overall than WA in terms of hunting AND fishing. Everything else is a push IMO.
Posted by LSUintheNW
At your mom’s house
Member since Aug 2009
36805 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Thanks. Bend (& Sisters) is in our plans.


You won't be sorry!

A pic from the bend area a month ago. For some reason people assume the WHOLE state gets rain 365 days a year. That area averages 12 inches and over 300 sunshiny days a year. Not too shabby.


Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
16826 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:40 pm to
You're absolutely right. I'm just not very familiar with Oregon besides the Punch Bowl and the Alvord Desert ( both beautiful). Unfortunately the little bit I do know has only been over the internet
This post was edited on 3/1/13 at 1:43 pm
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:46 pm to
I'm late to this here but...you joking about CA being the best outdoorsman state, right?

Piss poor water management has led to incredible strain on the salmon populations (ironic op name). Steelhead are on the brink. Sturgeon and halibut numbers are down.

Fishing regulations are absolutely laughable. The regs are so fricking convoluted that the only thing to co.e out of them is enhanced revenue for the big nanny state. Species preservation be damned...we need more revenue. Game wardens run flat out wild in this state. I get boarded once every other trip in the ocean.

That being said there are a lot of black tail deer and scrawny turkey. If that's what you base your assessment on then...I can't dispute because I havent hunted in CA yet.

I give LA or TX or MS the thumbs up for all around great opportunities for the activities that we love here on the OB.
Posted by treble hook
Member since Nov 2011
2310 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Overall though I'd say Montana/Wyoming/Colorado don't have too many of these



Posted by TRUERockyTop
Appalachia
Member since Sep 2011
16826 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Bend, OR
Redding, CA
Boise, ID
Missoula, MT
Jackson, WY
Reno, NV
Glenwood Springs, CO
Logan, UT
Lincoln, NH
Bangor, ME

Are all places surrounded by awesomeness that still include the amenities of a city.


Knoxville, TN / Asheville, NC
- I feel two of the very few cities from the south that could be added to this list. With multiple big game avenues, the largest Mountains east of the Mississppi, amazing fresh water fishing, hiking, biking, camping, Ski / Snowboarding ,mountaineering, bush wacking, etc. The fact that this area is one of the few areas in the south with a Very Healthy Black Bear population alone is something I'm very proud of. Albeit it does lack the Salt Water fishing. The area does have a lot of things most Southern states lack
This post was edited on 3/1/13 at 2:04 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
104409 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 2:02 pm to
There are ducks in Montana, you just hunt them in October instead of Dec/Jan.
Posted by DonChowder
Sonoma County
Member since Dec 2012
9249 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 2:05 pm to
I'm late to this here but...you joking about CA being the best outdoorsman state, right?

Piss poor water management has led to incredible strain on the salmon populations (ironic op name). Steelhead are on the brink. Sturgeon and halibut numbers are down.

Fishing regulations are absolutely laughable. The regs are so fricking convoluted that the only thing to co.e out of them is enhanced revenue for the big nanny state. Species preservation be damned...we need more revenue. Game wardens run flat out wild in this state. I get boarded once every other trip in the ocean.

That being said there are a lot of black tail deer and scrawny turkey. If that's what you base your assessment on then...I can't dispute because I havent hunted in CA yet.

I give LA or TX or MS the thumbs up for all around great opportunities for the activities that we love here on the OB.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44966 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Knoxville, TN / Asheville, NC


I love this area of the country.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297469 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 3:20 pm to
quote:


I give LA or TX or MS the thumbs up for all around great opportunities for the activities that we love here on the OB.


Probably isn't a wrong answer to the question unless you say Rhode Island. Wherever you like to be outdoors the most, is the best spot for you. I guess it depends on what you like to do and where you like to do it.
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 4:13 pm to
quote:

etc, places like CO and the Pacific Northwest move to the top of the list,

And if you count scuba diving or spearfishing they move back down the list.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram