Started By
Message
locked post

New Cap will capture 80,000 barrels a day - 100%

Posted on 7/6/10 at 5:51 pm
Posted by CE Tiger
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
41584 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 5:51 pm
quote:

•Coast Guard Adm. Thad Allen told CNN today that over the next seven to 10 days, officials will be monitoring weather patterns to determine if and when they would try to install a new containment cap, a process that will involve unbolting the jagged edge that exists on the structure now. Once completed, the new containment cap, he said, will achieve a perfect seal and keep oil from escaping. Allen said the new cap "would let us get to a capture rate of 80,000 barrels a day," and said he was planning a trip to Houston, Texas, to talk to BP officials about the plan. (CNN-Wire)
This post was edited on 7/6/10 at 5:57 pm
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51903 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 5:55 pm to
In this case, I would rather know a percentage of vented oil that is being captured.

But I think it means that they can capture UP to 80k a day. They are looking to seal altogether.
Posted by CE Tiger
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
41584 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

In this case, I would rather know a percentage of vented oil that is being captured.

100%
Posted by Venicetiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2004
6152 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 6:02 pm to
Gtfo
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14663 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 6:16 pm to
I'd still like to know why the diamond wire saw was abandoned. That would have enabled them to install a sealing LMRP cap much sooner.
Posted by tygerstripes
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
3391 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 6:38 pm to
And they waited this long to do this because?
Posted by LSUKNUT
Naples, Florida
Member since Jun 2007
2314 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 7:45 pm to


Does anyone know if this is the correct layout on the seafloor?
Posted by windriver
West Monroe/San Diego
Member since Mar 2006
8656 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

THEY WOULD TRY to install a new containment cap




Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27823 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 8:04 pm to
So, would they still need to drill the relief well if they are collecting all the oil? Is this not sustainable? BP has already stated that all revenue made from this will go to the gulf coast. Keep the sucker going if they have it contained. $$$
Posted by Wiggles
Berwick, LA
Member since Jul 2010
350 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 8:44 pm to
They need the relief wells so they can get the damaged BOP off the well. I only have a year experience in the oilfield, but I'm pretty sure a relief well is infinitely better than a cap.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14663 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

Does anyone know if this is the correct layout on the seafloor?

That riser pipe is no longer connected to the BOP so it really doesn't matter what the layout is anymore.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14663 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

So, would they still need to drill the relief well if they are collecting all the oil? Is this not sustainable? BP has already stated that all revenue made from this will go to the gulf coast. Keep the sucker going if they have it contained. $$$

No, it's not sustainable to have all those ships and drill platforms out in the Gulf indefinitely. Their plan is, to quote Kent Wells, "to fill it full of cement". The well is damaged and who knows what will fail next. The safest thing to do is cement it in and abandon it. Then when the moratorium is lifted they can go back and drill another well in MC 252.
Posted by Shankopotomus
Social Distanced
Member since Feb 2009
21057 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 9:21 pm to
As wonderful as this sounds, right now I have to believe this is just another floated PR talking point by BP to give the media and the rest of us some hope....just like topkill/original tophat/etc.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

I have to believe this is just another floated PR talking point by BP to give the media and the rest of us some hope....just like topkill/original tophat/etc.


These were not mere talking points, they were serious attempts at capping it. Stopping a blowout is inherently an imperfect business, and always has been.
Posted by Wiggles
Berwick, LA
Member since Jul 2010
350 posts
Posted on 7/6/10 at 10:36 pm to
BP is actually doing a lot to try to stop this leak. I work for the company that built the BOP and we've built two manifolds and the new cap stack for BP for this. We're building something else right now but I'm not sure what it's for.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22777 posts
Posted on 7/7/10 at 2:01 am to
Top kill did not work because of a rupture down hole. Top kill might have worked but the coast guard called a stop to the operation because of fear of a failure of the casing which would have rendered the flow unstoppable or even capturable until the relief wells kill it. Good call or bad call... we may never know.

BP could have injected mud at a higher volume and pressure but that was stopped. Mud was going down the well and should have been enough to kill the well but didn't so more pressure and mud might not have worked if it was all going out the well 1000 foot down.

The band saw blade(wire) never broke. It was slipping. Speculation is that the flow was pinning the wire due to the flow flexing the wire upwards. Decision to stop the saw was made for fear the wire would brake off. Apparently this would have been a bad bad thing.
Posted by MountainTiger
The foot of Mt. Belzoni
Member since Dec 2008
14663 posts
Posted on 7/7/10 at 9:52 am to
That's very good info, omega. Do you have an online source for that or is it stuff that other people have told you...insider info so to speak?
Posted by TennBYUBENGAL
A Nomad
Member since Sep 2007
24 posts
Posted on 7/7/10 at 12:53 pm to
Not in the oilfield industry but do have some inside info on cap. Talked with the lead on the engineering team two weeks ago and they have been designing cap since 10 Jun. If the bolts will not come out, they have a design to go over
top of that piece to seal and get a good fitting so that a valve to capture oil can be placed on top. Company doing eng. is same as one that makes the piece with the bolts in it. The problem lies in getting a good seal with the irregular shape and it being bent at ackward angle. Like I say, not in the oilfield industry but saw the plans and the design team thinks ity will work but with the possibility of some leakage. This is not thru third party but directly from the design engineer who is a Slidell, La native and grad of USL. Lives in Hou area now. Testing is supposed to be done on the 10th. Will follow up after test is done.
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 7/7/10 at 1:20 pm to
Just PR to get us to shut up until the relief well is done.
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22777 posts
Posted on 7/7/10 at 1:46 pm to
Combination of things. Most is from online resources. The info on the saw part came from BP employee. Wish I could remember exactly what he said but that happened a number of weeks ago so the details on it are a bit fuzzy in my mind.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram