- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WSJ: LSU's Lazy River and the Student-Fee Sham
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:22 pm to TxTiger82
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:22 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
But I would argue that citizenship and higher education are not the same things.
You're right. Citizenship is far more important.
You can choose where or even to go to college.
Fail again, imbecile

Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:23 pm to Havoc
quote:
WSJ is trash.
It is one of the most conservative newspapers out there. Same owner as Fox News. What do you read/watch? InfoWars? Breitbart? Come on, man. That's propaganda.
This post was edited on 12/16/17 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:23 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Most students don't vote in things like this,
It wasn't just student government you tart. It was an open campus vote.
You don't vote...You can't complain. Or are you one of the pussy hat wearing sky screamers who didn't vote but Trump is not your president?
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:24 pm to CptBengal
quote:
You're right. Citizenship is far more important.
You can choose where or even to go to college.
The funny part is that when it comes to citizenship, you would almost certainly argue against raising taxes (based on what I know about your ideology from the poli board).
And yet, you are somehow in favor of raising student fees (which you have now implicitly admitted is true).
Ironic.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:25 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
It is one of the most conservative newspapers out there
An end of a sample space continuity doesn't not imply ideological identity, merely position relative to others in the sample space.
Fail yet again.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:25 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Less than 5% of students voted, but student fees increased by about 50%. They have not and will not go down.
Maybe more students should have voted
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:26 pm to CptBengal
quote:
It wasn't just student government you tart. It was an open campus vote.
Right, but very few students actually vote and administration knows this. Who do you think concocted the plan in the first place? You are a straight-up conspiracy theorist, and yet you refuse to believe that the university administration can manipulate a student referendum? Wow, dude.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:26 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
The funny part is that when it comes to citizenship, you would almost certainly argue against raising taxes (based on what I know about your ideology from the poli board).
If the citizenry in a town votes to raise taxes for 3 years to build a new community center that IS THEIR CHOICE AND VOTE.
You know nothing about self determination, sky screamer.

Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:26 pm to CptBengal
quote:
sky screamer
I've honestly never head that one before. Points for originality, I guess.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:27 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Who do you think concocted the plan in the first place?
Actually it was a joke at first...submitted by a fraternity that got traction.
Fail again, imbecile.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:27 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
Right, but very few students actually vote and administration knows this. Who do you think concocted the plan in the first place? You are a straight-up conspiracy theorist, and yet you refuse to believe that the university administration can manipulate a student referendum? Wow, dude
Calls someone a conspiracy theorist.
Says administration manipulated referumdum.
Again, I have no dog in this fight, but you are embarrassing yourself.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:28 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
People who had no possibility of voting will continue to pay for the facility long after the people who voted have graduated.
By choosing to go to the university.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:28 pm to CptBengal
quote:
An end of a sample space continuity doesn't not imply ideological identity, merely position relative to others in the sample space.
Fail yet again.
Uh, no. The editorial portion of WSJ is very conservative from a financial point of view. No, they are not Breitbart conservatives (an oxymoron, really) like you. They are actual conservatives. You know, the kind who want limited government and lower taxes?
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:28 pm to Lou Pai
Laugh it up but that pool is greatness.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:29 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Calls someone a conspiracy theorist.
He actually is a conspiracy theorist. If you posted on the poli board you would know that. Like three days ago, he was over there claiming the Alabama Senate Election was rigged. Something about bussing voters in from Mississippi or some crap.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:29 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
They are actual conservatives. You know, the kind who want limited government and lower taxes?
Actually their editorial board was against the current tax cuts last month.
Fail again. I read it everyday, you clearly don't. I'm sorry you're stupid.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:30 pm to HollyWoodCole
It's just my interpretation
Of the situation
Of the situation
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:30 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Again, I have no dog in this fight, but you are embarrassing yourself.
You a cheerleader, bro. Nothing is more embarrassing than that.
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:31 pm to TxTiger82
quote:
You a cheerleader, bro. Nothing is more embarrassing than that.
I'm not sure what this means?
Posted on 12/16/17 at 12:31 pm to CptBengal
quote:
Actually their editorial board was against the current tax cuts last month.
Because those "tax cuts" are actually tax increases for many people.
Popular
Back to top
