Started By
Message

re: Would a $500+ car note break the bank for you?

Posted on 7/22/19 at 9:13 am to
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
30942 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 9:13 am to
If a 500 dollar note breaks you or remotely puts you in a bind, you need a better job.

And if I can get less than 2% interest, which is likely, I would be dumb as shite to not finance the vehicle for as long as they will let me.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84585 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

it is a thread in which the OT can pretend to be rich while also arguing who is the smartest with money

it was guaranteed to go at least 10+ pages


I know this thread is dead, but I did the math anyways and I'm going to just bookmark this post for future reference in the "finance vs pay cash debate".

To measure opportunity cost, I used BALCX, which is a balanced C-share mutual fund that has information back to July 1975. In lieu of paying $50,000 cash, I assumed you invested $50,000 and took the car payment out of that balance at the end of each month. I ignored taxes, but they wouldn't impact the numbers in any significant way.

At 3.5% for 60 months payments(withdrawals) would be $910/mth

Rolling 60-month periods: 468
Periods where cash was better (periods where investing ran out of money before 60 months): 51 (11% of the time)
Periods where investing was better: 417 (89% of the time)
Average ending balance: $11,332
Median ending balance: $11,545
Average ending balance when cash was better: -$5,144
Worst ending balance when cash was better: -$12,386
Highest ending balance: $48,723

For those who say financing for 84 months is asinine - 84 months @ 3.5% would be $672/mth withdrawals

Rolling 84-month periods: 444
Periods where cash was better (periods where investing ran out of money before 84 months): 54 (12% of the time)
Periods where investing was better: 390 (88% of the time)
Average ending balance: $18,449
Median ending balance: $19,012
Average ending balance when cash was better: -$4,050
Worst ending balance when cash was better: -$11,116
Highest ending balance: $65,703

What if you financed $50,000 @ 6% for 84 months?

Rolling 84-month periods: 444
Periods where cash was better (periods where investing ran out of money before 84 months): 87 (20% of the time)
Periods where investing was better: 357 (80% of the time)
Average ending balance: $11,475
Median ending balance: $12,295
Average ending balance when cash was better: -$7,374
Worst ending balance when cash was better: -$18,295
Highest ending balance: $57,408

In fact, since 1975, an argument can be made for financing for 84 months up to 10%. Paying cash was better in more than 50% of rolling periods when the rate got above 10%.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
COINTELPRO Fan
Member since May 2012
55526 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 12:15 pm to
“Go off King”
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 12:17 pm to
20 more pages
Posted by iAmBatman
The Batcave
Member since Mar 2011
12382 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 1:43 pm to








Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
26898 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 2:03 pm to
...but Dave Ramsey said.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

but Dave Ramsey said
to be fair to Dave Ramsey, his schtick isn't that slackster is wrong on the math, but that human behavior rarely works that way, i.e. people aren't borrowing for 84 months to invest the same amount, but rather because they don't have the money and are focused on a monthly payment they think they can afford.
Everyone on the ot is the exception to the statistics, so his advice isn't prudent here.
This post was edited on 7/22/19 at 2:13 pm
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84585 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

to be fair to Dave Ramsey, his schtick isn't that slackster is wrong on the math, but that human behavior rarely works that way, i.e. people aren't borrowing for 84 months to invest the same amount, but rather because they don't have the money and are focused on a monthly payment they think they can afford. Everyone on the ot is the exception to the statistics, so his advice isn't prudent here.


That's correct.

Behavioral finance would suggest the vast majority of people finance in order to buy more car than they can actually afford.

My post is simply to suggest financing is often a prudent financial strategy for those who are disciplined enough to use it appropriately. Same with credit cards.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/22/19 at 2:21 pm to
Bingo
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
9657 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 9:25 pm to
quote:


Why not?


Same reason you can't compare a CD rate to average market returns and automatically say "the market is better."

Risk adjustment matters. An expected average higher rate of return from the market doesn't always mean it's better than paying down a lower rate loan.

LINK

Duh.
Jump to page
Page First 14 15 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 16 of 16Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram