- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: When did you first become aware of your privilege?
Posted on 8/5/20 at 5:53 pm to RT1941
Posted on 8/5/20 at 5:53 pm to RT1941
quote:
Learned to appreciate the hard work and struggles his ancestors endured to make something out of nothing in this country?
That's generally what SJWs consider privilege. If you're successful, you're privileged. Its commie horseshite to make the soys feel better about themselves.
There are literally millions of combinations that decide success. Way too many to generalize under one term.
Posted on 8/5/20 at 5:55 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
There are literally millions of combinations that decide success. Way too many to generalize under one term.
Once again something I’ve said multiple times in this very thread.

Posted on 8/5/20 at 5:58 pm to RogerTheShrubber
So what is the summary of my thread?
I say a Mage can't wear Heavy Armor and a Warrior doesn't have the mana to cast. But each can handle their own if they learn how to use their natural attributes and mitigate the hazards of their respective classes.
Should we nerf Warriors and make them wear cloth, and sap mana from mages to make each equal? Basically hurting both for the sake of equal outcomes?
I say a Mage can't wear Heavy Armor and a Warrior doesn't have the mana to cast. But each can handle their own if they learn how to use their natural attributes and mitigate the hazards of their respective classes.
Should we nerf Warriors and make them wear cloth, and sap mana from mages to make each equal? Basically hurting both for the sake of equal outcomes?
Posted on 8/5/20 at 6:04 pm to TH03
quote:
Privilege, education, hard work, good fortune, connections, etc. You need more than one of these to be successful. Not having one doesn’t preclude you from being successful and having all of them doesn’t guarantee success.
Yeah I think most would find this reasonable, but my point is that your concept of privilege itself can be broken into a pie of countless pieces, each piece representing whatever factor of your being endears you to society. This could be how you dress, your skin coloration, your religion, your tattoos, etc.
“Society” in this context is also not homogenous. These things might change in how they are perceived based on location and what your particular social circle is.
And usually people tend to focus on only one variable, which is a drastic oversimplification. But even when they don’t, these are whole lot of words to state the obvious that some people have a harder time than others in life. I struggle to find where this dialogue is productive or useful.
Seems like if someone has misfortune, it is a more productive exercise to analyze specific factors that led to the misfortune instead of pigeonholing him into a macroscopic box and saying that a lack of privilege for whichever particular box we are placing the individual in is a primary reason why. I think this would be psychologically troublesome and likely to lead to fatalism, and all for a premise that I believe is mightily flawed.
This post was edited on 8/5/20 at 6:10 pm
Posted on 8/5/20 at 6:06 pm to Kujo
Is being a "success" equally measured?
If one person has a degree and a $50k job, he is a success, a role model, someone parents want their daughter to meet.
Another person with just an undergraduate degree and a measly $50k job, is a mid-level failure with no ambition.
They each want to buy a house.
One has to spend 200k to buy a house with his peers, the other has only to spend $100k. The failure has to pay double the mortgage that the success story has to pay.
Should this be factored in to the respective struggles?
If one person has a degree and a $50k job, he is a success, a role model, someone parents want their daughter to meet.
Another person with just an undergraduate degree and a measly $50k job, is a mid-level failure with no ambition.
They each want to buy a house.
One has to spend 200k to buy a house with his peers, the other has only to spend $100k. The failure has to pay double the mortgage that the success story has to pay.
Should this be factored in to the respective struggles?
Posted on 8/5/20 at 6:16 pm to Ross
quote:
Seems like if someone has misfortune, it is a more productive exercise to analyze specific factors that led to the misfortune instead of pigeonholing him into a macroscopic box and saying that a lack of privilege for whichever particular box we are placing the individual in is a primary reason why.
I agree and that isn’t my intent no matter how hard roger and others try to say it is.
There are a ton of different variables that go into having a successful life. Deficiencies in certain areas can be overcome by others to a certain degree so you can’t blame your failures on one specific variable.
There are certain “combinations” that you can look at and be able to predict success at a good rate, but nothing is absolute.
Back to top
