Started By
Message

re: What the anti-gambling N LA politicians are costing the state.

Posted on 8/1/18 at 11:59 pm to
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98164 posts
Posted on 8/1/18 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

It's not like it's costing YOU any more money if you don't indulge. In fact, it's helping you by increasing state revenue. 



If you own a bar or restaurant or other business that relies on discretionary income, it might. Those dollars are not infinitely elastic. Money spent gambling is money not spent somewhere else.

OTOH if you own pawnshop or payday loan company, you probably love the idea.

And as already stated in this thread, gambling has done little for a the state revenue picture. No reason to believe sports betting would be any different.

I'm not against it. People should be able to indulge in any vice they wish to, within reason. I am injecting some realism into the discussion, though.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
47529 posts
Posted on 8/2/18 at 2:40 am to
quote:

Yeah, but that's no reason to not making it available for those who would like to consume it.
I'm better than you. I don't play video crack, (whatever other vice you don't partake in)

And think about this. You have betting in MS. Why legalize it here when they're not gonna drive across the border bc they have it?
This post was edited on 8/2/18 at 2:43 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram