Started By
Message

What major US city (like top 50) would fare best?

Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:29 am
Posted by SwatMitchell
Austin, TX
Member since Jan 2005
2312 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:29 am
In a major rain event such as Harvey: let's say 25 - 45 inches over 3 days covering a 50 mile radius around downtown...

I know that none would fare well, but some would fare better than others.
Posted by Hacker
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2009
3239 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:30 am to
Umm, Vegas, Phoenix,
Posted by brucevilanch
Fort Worth, Tejas
Member since May 2011
24333 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:31 am to
Denver
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
65681 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:31 am to
denver?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73674 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:31 am to
Doesn't Phoenix flood from an average rain?
Posted by 12Pence
Member since Jan 2013
6344 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:32 am to
Denver ?
This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 11:34 am
Posted by TigerNAtux
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
17111 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:33 am to
Correct. Phoenix floods very easily.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31886 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:33 am to
Non-coastal cities would be obliterated due to design year events being around 25-year.....I'd surmise Seattle would do better than the average bear simply due to dealing with consistent rain fall. You could put Miami in that conversation as well or even higher.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73674 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:34 am to
I thought San Fran, but for some reason mudslides come to mind.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115486 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Vegas


Vegas has had to build these massive rain tunnels/sewage systems, because when they have a heavy rain event, it can immediately flood due to how dry the soil is and how rare it is.

If Vegas was hit by a Harvey I imagine it would be pretty bad.

Seems like a place like Denver would do ok.
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
60119 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:35 am to
My first thought was Miami or Tampa
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120173 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:36 am to
Assuming just rain and no storm surge?

A city actually on the coast should handle it best since water doesnr have to drain far.

So maybe Miami
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28250 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Denver


Does/would Denver drain well? It seems like there could be some big issue with mountain runoff
Posted by cwarr14
up da bayou
Member since Oct 2013
386 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Seems like a place like Denver would do ok.



Trust me It will flood here too with 4" of rain
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31886 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:37 am to
2013 Colorado Floods


quote:

The situation intensified on September 11 and 12. Boulder County was worst hit, with 9.08 inches (231 mm) recorded September 12 and up to 17 inches (430 mm) of rain recorded


...now imagine what 50" would do....
This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36588 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:37 am to
quote:

surmise Seattle would do better than the average bear simply due to dealing with consistent rain fall.


but they average >10 inches less a year than Houston does and 13 inches less than Harvey dropped in spots in Houston and Beaumont.

This post was edited on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am to
quote:


What major US city (like top 50) would fare best?


I'm guessing Seattle and San Francisco that drain directly out into the ocean.

I'm sure they both still have low points that would flood, but I bet it would be less impactful than in Houston.

I think Vegas would be the most fricked, since they have mountains on all sides, they are pretty much in a valley bowl... it would take a LONG time for all of that to flow into Lake Mead.
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79117 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am to
It's hard to say based on that, because that type of rain is even more abnormal in some areas than others.

Atlanta hit over 500 year flood levels in 2009 with 10-15 inches of rain.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
21231 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:38 am to
I am going San Francisco. Sure there are parts that are going to get 20 feet deep, but there is a lot of elevation.

Places like the Marina district and probably Mission are going to get wasted, but Presido, Castro, Nob Hill, Pacific Heights should be fine. Most water is going to drain away from center.

This is all assuming this did not come with storm surge.

Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31886 posts
Posted on 8/31/17 at 11:39 am to
Its the closest large metro area I can think of that experiences higher than typical precip....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram