- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UW professor: The information war is real, and we’re losing it
Posted on 11/20/17 at 8:24 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Posted on 11/20/17 at 8:24 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
Sure MSM has bias but they also have accountability
Exactly. Infowars can be wrong 100 times as long as they’re right once and the MSM is wrong that same time.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 8:27 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
hosted by informal President Donald Trump adviser Alex Jones,
Pretty sure Alex Jones never worked for Donald Trump in any capacity.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 8:33 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
quote:
To be antiglobalist often included being anti-mainstream media, anti-immigration, anti-science, anti-U.S. government, and anti-European Union,” Starbird says.
Gross overgeneralization. Extremely broad label.
To them:
Not wanting manufacturing jobs shipped overseas, or if you dont want open borders = anti-globalist.
Anti-mainstream media = what exactly? Not religiously soaking up every word of the NYT, WaPo, HuffPo,Vice, Vox, or trash sites like Slate or Mother Jones?
"anti-science", because maybe someone doesn't agree with one particular interpretation of scientific data, or how we should go about acting on the data? I bet there are "63 genders" type people who probably classify themselves as pro-science.
"anti-U.S. government" ? Thats antifa and most of the left. The left is clearly the only ones with the anti-US.
Now if they said "anti-government", that would mean something else entirely.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 8:46 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
Did we read different articles?
Sorry I only read what was originally quoted in the OP. Which is a similar topic, right?
How many of us are influenced by the headline or the posted title/quoted parts. Just look at Reddit. Users submit news articles with their own interpretation of the story and thousands of comments are posted that reveal no one clicked the link.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 8:48 pm to Hugo Stiglitz
Unbelievable article written by an ingnorant individual. CNN, msnbc, abc and the bunch do just as much damage probably more than an infowars, breitbart.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:20 pm to Magician2
Lol you should read the research paper.
I swear to God, first paper I've read that said. Hey I'm biased so you know this might affect the results
I swear to God, first paper I've read that said. Hey I'm biased so you know this might affect the results
Popular
Back to top

0




