- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US Supreme Court denies request by oil firms to halt coastal erosion suit
Posted on 11/9/23 at 11:41 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 11/9/23 at 11:41 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I was fishing in East Cameron Parish, launched out of Rockefeller and went down to a place called "The mud hole", passed some of Hilcorp's shallow marsh production platform.
The problem is most of those dredged canals happened in the 60s and 70s, no? Not sure which companies did them, but are they still around? Can anyone really be held accountable for what as a company they did in 60s/70s? Unless it was an Exxon or BP that still exists today
The problem is most of those dredged canals happened in the 60s and 70s, no? Not sure which companies did them, but are they still around? Can anyone really be held accountable for what as a company they did in 60s/70s? Unless it was an Exxon or BP that still exists today
Posted on 11/9/23 at 12:21 pm to TheDude321
Who gave them permission for the dredging back in those days? Did they follow all state laws?
I get people are upset, but if they followed all the laws and regulations given to them back then, are they really liable for future damages?
I get people are upset, but if they followed all the laws and regulations given to them back then, are they really liable for future damages?
Posted on 11/9/23 at 12:37 pm to TheFitfulFire
quote:
It has to do with that to some degree, but the oil companies dredged numerous canals through the marsh for drilling knowing it would significantly increase erosion and they did not care.
And the state approved it.
Popular
Back to top

0




