- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:20 pm to Glistening Member
x4
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 10:23 pm
Posted on 2/23/17 at 10:48 pm to Glistening Member
dang old timer, where you been?
Missing the hair.
Missing the hair.
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 10:49 pm
Posted on 2/24/17 at 12:58 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
• The Administration admitted to their lack of knowledge as well as to violating policy during testimony. There should not be a double standard for administration when it comes to the rules. The administration should be held to the same or higher standard than those of the officers it supervises. It should not be allowed to unilaterally hide behind the claim of ignorance to escape the corresponding liability and/or consequence.
Don’t ascribe to malice what can be plainly explained by incompetence. HANLON’S RAZOR
Posted on 2/24/17 at 5:32 am to dempeople
Been flying low under the radar
Posted on 2/27/17 at 7:01 pm to Glistening Member
Posted on 2/28/17 at 5:49 am to Dominate308
Guilty +1.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 6:13 am to Dominate308
Innocent
The dogs were running lose in violation of state law.
When the last dog made a charge toward the officer he had a right to protect himself.
Owner should be fined for each dog being loose.
We have a leash law in this state and if the owner would have had his dogs restrained this would never have happened.
If people think they can let their dogs loose, I can let my cattle run all over state hwys and if someone hits them they should be at fault not me.
The dogs were running lose in violation of state law.
When the last dog made a charge toward the officer he had a right to protect himself.
Owner should be fined for each dog being loose.
We have a leash law in this state and if the owner would have had his dogs restrained this would never have happened.
If people think they can let their dogs loose, I can let my cattle run all over state hwys and if someone hits them they should be at fault not me.
This post was edited on 2/28/17 at 6:16 am
Posted on 2/28/17 at 6:25 am to TigersSEC2010
A preliminary report from the police officer shows that the pupper reached for the police officer's weapon before being shot. The bodycam is also reported to have malfunctioned.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 6:36 am to Pecker
If the officer was the least bit afraid, why didn't he at the very least get behind his car? He obviously wanted to kill something, He couldn't get the dog to come out of the yard by coaxing it with the tazer. So he cursed and shot it in its own driveway. He should have been arrested for animal cruelty.
When PETA and the SPCA get this I expect that his career is over.
When PETA and the SPCA get this I expect that his career is over.
This post was edited on 2/28/17 at 6:38 am
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:01 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
Sounds like he got shafted by Dabadie.
Wasn't Dabadie let go by the new mayor after the election?
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:03 am to LesMiles BFF
quote:
It's always confusing when an officer gets suspended, or put on leave, or administrative relief, or paid relief, e
It's not vacation. Trust me.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:08 am to Dominate308
All this could have been avoided if the animals owner would have kept their animals in a secure area or with them on a leash. I believe state law also requires dog owners to do this.
When a first responder goes to a location he has no idea what he is running into. Put bull like breed not secured inside a fence or on a leash can be dangerous.
Again, the dogs by law should not have been loose and the owner of the dogs should be charged with violations also.
When a first responder goes to a location he has no idea what he is running into. Put bull like breed not secured inside a fence or on a leash can be dangerous.
Again, the dogs by law should not have been loose and the owner of the dogs should be charged with violations also.
This post was edited on 2/28/17 at 8:12 am
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:47 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
The dogs were running lose in violation of state law. When the last dog made a charge toward the officer he had a right to protect himself. Owner should be fined for each dog being loose.
Dogs were in their own yard. Looks a lot like an invisible fence. They are not loose if they are in their own yard. Many people in Baton Rouge have invisible fences, but the dogs won't come out of the yard.
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:48 am to Dominate308
quote:This fricker is guilty. I don't care if the dogs "by law" should have been chained or in a yard; they in no way posed a threat to the officer. I'd be ready to kill someone if they shot my dog after he got out of his yard and was only barking.
LINK
However:
quote:+
Pit bull
quote:= I don't give a shite.
Adams Ave
Posted on 2/28/17 at 8:59 am to johnnyrocket
quote:
The dogs were running lose in violation of state law.
Nope
quote:
When the last dog made a charge toward the officer he had a right to protect himself.
Dog never left it's yard
quote:
We have a leash law in this state and if the owner would have had his dogs restrained this would never have happened.
Dog does not have to be on a leash if they're in the yard
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News