Started By
Message

re: Two black guys show up to civil war reenactment as slaves trying to be a part of it lol

Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:03 am to
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15883 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:03 am to
You still haven't explained how slavery was based off of racism when clearly free men off ALL colors owned slaves. This wasn't just in the south as the exact same was in the North. And to know who slaves were we should start at the beginning point. Black slaves from Africa were enslaved from the start by other tribes who also were black. That's not a popular discussion but it's a true fact of slavery.

To be transparent I'm multiracial and have ancestors on both sides of the coin
This post was edited on 10/22/22 at 11:06 am
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:05 am to
quote:

Same. African slavery still exists. It never ended.


Uh, the specific system of African tribal slavery based on the loser in warfare serving time under the 'winner' definitely ended. So again, you don't know what I'm referring to here. Nicely done.

quote:

I'm sure there were just as many Africans who were racist against Europeans, but that doesn't make slavery more racist. The main reason for the color of the skin of people who were slaves was the overwhelming supply of those people to be purchased.



Again, European chattel slavery was racist, unless you want us to ignore what the Europeans themselves wrote. You can't discount 1st-person documentation because you don't like it.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59315 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:06 am to
quote:

There were black combat soldiers in the Confederate Army?


There were black slave owners in the South, so why is it far-fetched to believe there couldn't be black combat soldiers for the South as well?

I'll grant you that there weren't many black Confederates, but that it (as well as black plantation owners) are such hidden knowledge is part of the bigger issue of people playing politics with history to view it simply as black or white (pardon the pun) instead of seeing it fully.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65899 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:06 am to
quote:

Again, prominent Confederate and secessionist leaders of the day have explicitly given you your answer regarding what race and why. They are not my words or reasons.



I see you can't answer the question. Blows up your narrative too easily?
Posted by MikeyFL
Member since Sep 2010
10336 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:07 am to
I love the people in these threads who think the questionable presence of a dozen black soliders for the Confederacy somehow means that 4 million black slaves were all secretly big fans of states' rights.

But I guess it's the same mentality that says "the election was robbed because everyone I know voted for Candidate X!"
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:08 am to
quote:

There were black slave owners in the South, so why is it far-fetched to believe there couldn't be black combat soldiers for the South as well?



Who the frick cares about it being far-fetched? You can either back-up the claim or you can't. There is no imagination needed when we have plenty of source documentation. You understand that right?

quote:

I'll grant you that there weren't many black Confederates, but that it (as well as black plantation owners) are such hidden knowledge is part of the bigger issue of people playing politics with history to view it simply as black or white (pardon the pun) instead of seeing it fully.



It isn't hidden knowledge. What are you talking about?
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65899 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Uh, the specific system of African tribal slavery based on the loser in warfare serving time under the 'winner' definitely ended.


Oh. Well. How very encouraging for modern slaves.
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27406 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:09 am to
quote:

You still haven't explained how slavery was based off of racism when clearly free men off ALL colors owned slaves. This wasn't just in the south as the exact same was in the North. And to know who slaves were we should start at the beginning point. Black slaves from Africa were enslaved from the start by other tribes who also were black. That's not a popular discussion but it's a true fact of slavery.


This isn't about from the start. This thread is about the Civil War era. By that time, the international slave trade had been abolished and slaves were largely bred, bought, and sold internally.

By the time of the Civil War, Confederate and secessionist leaders often explicitly argued that enslaving black people was the natural condition of the African race and morally good. Their enslavement based on race is explicitly argued time and time and time again. A couple of examples of black slaveowners doesn't change that.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Oh. Well. How very encouraging for modern slaves.



Let's not try to change the subject. You didn't understand what I meant, clearly had no background with it, and then kept talking about modern slavery as though that was relevant to the point.

I guess you are giving up the line that European chattel slavery wasn't inherently racist, lol.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65899 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:10 am to
quote:

I love the people in these threads who think the questionable presence of a dozen black soliders for the Confederacy somehow means that 4 million black slaves were all secretly big fans of states' rights.


Who said this?

quote:

But I guess it's the same mentality that says "the election was robbed because everyone I know voted for Candidate X!"


Oh, nevermind. You're one of those.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15883 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:11 am to
quote:

You can either back-up the claim or you can't. There is no


William "April"Ellison was a black slave owner in South Carolina who had 2 sons fight for the Confederacy.
Posted by MikeyFL
Member since Sep 2010
10336 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Who said this?


Why even bring up such an idiotic point unless that is your argument? No one with a modicum of intelligence cares whether or not there were black soliders or black slaveowners.

The practice of slavery was horrific, and war was justified to end it. Full stop.


quote:

Oh, nevermind. You're one of those.



Exactly the mentality I'm talking about.

Election deniers are on all sides.
This post was edited on 10/22/22 at 11:14 am
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65899 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:13 am to
quote:

You didn't understand what I meant, clearly had no background with it, and then kept talking about modern slavery as though that was relevant to the point.


Absolutely incorrect. You're still trying to talk about African and Asian slavery as if those things ever ended. Until you are capable of coming up with an argument without this failing, there's nothing to discuss. You clearly haven't put critical thought into this.

quote:

I guess you are giving up the line that European chattel slavery wasn't inherently racist, lol.


No. Slavery has never been inherently racist. Terrible, for sure, and I absolutely oppose it, but the slavery in our past isn't worse than any other slavery that existed at the time or exists today. I won't pretend otherwise.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65899 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Election deniers are on all sides.


But only one side has actual facts to back it up.
Posted by MikeyFL
Member since Sep 2010
10336 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:16 am to
quote:

But only one side has actual facts to back it up.




I heard the same horseshite from Abrams supporters during the last Georgia gubernatorial election.
Posted by SOSFAN
Blythewood
Member since Jun 2018
15883 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:16 am to
quote:

A couple of examples of black slaveowners doesn't change that.


That's extremely naive of you, unless it was stated to try and back your view, as there were thousands of examples not just a couple but thousands. Slavery was a necessity, though a horrible one, based off of business than one based primarily on racism. Why would blacks and Indians own slaves if it were mainly about racism and not a business need called labor.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:18 am to
quote:

William "April"Ellison was a black slave owner in South Carolina who had 2 sons fight for the Confederacy.



A grandson, according to the Larry Koger book.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65899 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Why would blacks and Indians own slaves if it were mainly about racism and not a business need called labor.


Because history is supposed to be clean and line up to my delicate sensibilities, dang it!
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:20 am to
quote:

You're still trying to talk about African and Asian slavery as if those things ever ended


They did exist, and they differed in meaningful ways from European chattel slavery. Do you know how they differed? Do you care?

quote:

Slavery has never been inherently racist.


Again, if I take the 1st-person source documentation at its word, this is wrong, completely and utterly, with respect to European chattel slavery. If we are talking about slavery as a broad concept, sure, but that doesn't change the fact that the self-justification apparatus that developed in Europe used specifically racial qualifications.
Posted by MikeyFL
Member since Sep 2010
10336 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Why would blacks and Indians own slaves if it were mainly about racism and not a business need called labor.



How many white people were enslaved? I seem to have forgotten how there must have been millions of white slaves to meet labor market demands.

You're missing your calling. You would have a lovely time running a factory in Xinjiang.
This post was edited on 10/22/22 at 11:23 am
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram