- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Truck thread - $86K for new GMC 2500?
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:01 pm to J.Peterman
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:01 pm to J.Peterman
Eh, basically with the exception of highly unreliable stuff like AFM
This post was edited on 6/23/15 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:04 pm to X123F45
quote:
I'm surebwe can mount you a vibrator if you need it. Big and black right?
You sure seem to have dildos on your mind a lot.
quote:
Who needs to finance 25k?
OT joke. Very original.
quote:
They drive better than the only straight axle suv offered.
quote:
It wasn't meant to be an argument, just highlighting a viable alternative to the new car purchase.
There is nothing viable about the alternative you're proposing.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:05 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
Buying new is the quickest way to lose 30-50% of your money in a single day - a typical decision by those destined to be in their same (or lower) financial class for life.
This looks like something you tried to pass off as fact, but what do I know?
This post was edited on 6/23/15 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:06 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:Nah, I'd still say it's a waste. It may be a waste that they happen to want (or, at least, are willing to accept), but it's still a waste.
not if thats what you want.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:07 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
Nah, I'd still say it's a waste. It may be a waste that they happen to want (or, at least, are willing to accept), but it's still a waste.
Just STFU already. Good lord.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:07 pm to LNCHBOX
It was hyperbole, but the general idea holds true.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:10 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
There is nothing viable about the alternative you're proposing.
The fact that I just took my current one to Cali and back with a few days spent in MOAB. Says it is indeed viable.
But, potato puhdildo.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:10 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
It was hyperbole, but the general idea holds true.
Except it doesn't. Find me the massive day 1 depreciation in these cars on this list
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:11 pm to X123F45
quote:
The fact that I just took my current one to Cali and back with a few days spent in MOAB. Says it is indeed viable.
Viable doesn't mean the car can make a trip
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:18 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Except it doesn't. Find me the massive day 1 depreciation in these cars on this list
Used car dealers don't sell cars for the same price they paid the original owner.
Show me what the original short-term owners of those cars got paid for their trade-ins. Guaranteed, they lost a double-digit percentage of the cars' retail price, at a minimum.
This post was edited on 6/23/15 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:19 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Viable doesn't mean the car can make a trip
I wonder if you know the definition of viable?
Given that the suv completed a cross country road trip, traveled where no new SUV can, transported us in comfort amd safety, provided us with navigation and entertainment, was pleasant to drive, and drew a few compliments for the vain among us... It would stand to reason it successfully completely the work of a new vehicle (and exceeded it in certain areas).
By definition, it is viable.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:20 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
Show me what the original short-term owner of those cars got paid for his trade-ins. Guaranteed, he lost a double-digit percentage of the car's retail price, at a minimum.
probably not anywhere near 10% or over, but you could do the same scenario with a used car as well.
Buy a used car from a lot, then see what you get for trade in. Your argument even demonstrates that
quote:
Used car dealers don't sell cars for the same price they paid the original owner
This post was edited on 6/23/15 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:21 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
Guaranteed, they lost a double-digit percentage of the cars' retail price, at a minimum.
Wait...
I thought it was 30-50%
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:23 pm to X123F45
quote:
I wonder if you know the definition of viable?
A viable alternative is something that could be easily done. What you're suggesting isn't easy to implement.
quote:
By definition, it is viable.
not compared to buying a modern vehicle.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:24 pm to LNCHBOX
If it's so cheap, awesome, and reliable, why isn't it being mass produced?
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:27 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
A viable alternative is something that could be easily done. What you're suggesting isn't easy to implement.
not compared to buying a modern vehicle.
Is it easier to earn 30k or:
shop around until you find what you want?
or
build what you want?
I'm not an OT baller, dropping 50-90k on a vehicle is insanity.
I'll go be poor and prudently invested over here.
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:27 pm to LNCHBOX
I'm confused
Who's vehicle did he drive cross country? I thought he was just contemplating buying one
Who's vehicle did he drive cross country? I thought he was just contemplating buying one
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:28 pm to X123F45
quote:
Is it easier to earn 30k or:
shop around until you find what you want?
or
build what you want?
I'm not an OT baller, dropping 50-90k on a vehicle is insanity.
I'll go be poor and prudently invested over here.
So the only options are now build your Frankenturd, or spend $50k? No in between?
Posted on 6/23/15 at 3:29 pm to X123F45
quote:
I'll go be poor and prudently invested over here.
But I thought you wanted leather on your 30,000 dollar toy
Popular
Back to top


1




