Started By
Message

re: Three Arkansas officers suspended and under investigation after video shows use of force

Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:43 am to
Posted by Geekboy
Member since Jan 2004
6330 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:43 am to
I have zero issues with this. You pull shite like this AND resist arrest??? frick you. You should be beaten viciously.
This coddling of criminals has gotten us where we are today.
I’m actually for shooting suspects that resist arrest. frick these cocksuckers.
And you Leftist snowflake addicted to being offended pussies can kiss my arse.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
20194 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:45 am to
“Whatever is required to get compliance” is not the standard. Excessive means excessive.
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32920 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:46 am to
That's.... A take.
Posted by UndercoverBryologist
Member since Nov 2020
8077 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:47 am to
quote:

I hear you. I guess I probably wouldn't kill a cop but I sure as hell would get revenge one way or another if it wasn't the cops. I just don't see a way that you beat a cop with a baseball bat and get it away with it. I could beat Leroy Jenkins with a bat if necessary and get away it.


I mean, how dumb do the cops have to be to respond to a little, frail, old lady (who probably didn’t weigh more than 100 pounds soaking wet), walking along the side of the highway, and while talking to her, not realize she didn’t have all of her marbles…and then slam her body to the ground and then up against the car for petty theft ($14 in merchandise)?

…and then laugh callously about it later with no shame?

I know the “replace cops with social workers” thing got turned into a punchline during the height of the Defund the Police call in 2020. And maybe that was mostly pie in the sky. But this is actually a case where, obviously, a gentler touch would have worked better.

Obviously, it’s too much to expect cops to spot the tell-tale signs of dementia and to not use excessive force on a frail woman.

Edit: what’s the old saying “If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.”

This post was edited on 8/22/22 at 8:49 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:47 am to
quote:

“Whatever is required to get compliance” is not the standard. Excessive means excessive.


Excessive is subjective. The official definition is "more than required to gain compliance."

quote:

Excessive force by a law enforcement officer is any force used which exceeds what is necessary to gain compliance or control


This post was edited on 8/22/22 at 8:49 am
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:48 am to
quote:

That's not an answer. How much exactly? 100% being every interaction where a contact doesn't comply with every single command of the officer be it legal or not. 0% being, well 0.


Ok how about 1 in a million?

There were 10 million arrests last year so there would be 10 incidents like this a year.

So I gave you a number. What is your number?
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
20194 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:48 am to
I hope you still sing this shitty tune when the IRS breaks down your door and kills your and your dog because you didn’t file that landscaping LLC
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
20194 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:49 am to
Again, you said “whatever is required to gain compliance” which is completely incorrect.

Use of force will change depending on the facts and circumstances, however.
Posted by bgtiger
Prairieville
Member since Dec 2004
11754 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Wanna bet the “terroristic threats” charge was tacked on when the police realized the video was going to look bad?


Ya think they went back and talked the clerk into lying about what happened afterward?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Obviously, it’s too much to expect cops to spot the tell-tale signs of dementia


A byproduct of the "protect yourself at all cost" mentality that came with militarization, following the Gulf War.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
23495 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:50 am to
quote:

I have zero issues with this. You pull shite like this AND resist arrest??? frick you. You should be beaten viciously.
This coddling of criminals has gotten us where we are today.
I’m actually for shooting suspects that resist arrest. frick these cocksuckers.
And you Leftist snowflake addicted to being offended pussies can kiss my arse.


Another moron that must think all cops are good people.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:51 am to
quote:

Again, you said “whatever is required to gain compliance” which is completely incorrect.


No, that's correct.

Excessive exceeds that. Its in the definition.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:52 am to
quote:

think all cops are good people.


Theyre just people. Not better or worse.
They're not superhuman.
Posted by Smoke7024
Member since Jun 2010
23495 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:53 am to
Exactly, that's why you can't give them free reign to shoot people for resisting arrest.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:53 am to
quote:

Excessive force is very subjective


Yes.

And it depends on many factors.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
20194 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:56 am to
quote:

No, that's correct. Excessive exceeds that. Its in the definition.

It is not correct. “Whatever is required” will never be the standard—the reasonable police officer defines it based on the facts and circumstances
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32920 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:56 am to
quote:

There were 10 million arrests last year so there would be 10 incidents like this a year.

So you agree that the current numbers are extremely too high.

quote:

So I gave you a number. What is your number?
I already gave you my number. My number of acceptable instances like this is 0.
Posted by eatpie
Kentucky
Member since Aug 2018
1451 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Yeah maybe if all cops are inherently good people. Too bad that's not the case.



Show us where ALL of any specific group are inherently good. With cops, at least there are specific laws, training, evaluations etc to TRY to control bad actors.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Exactly, that's why you can't give them free reign to shoot people for resisting arrest


If the perp is a mass murderer and if that person was putting people at risk., it would be closer to "not excessive" than if that person was a speeder.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 8/22/22 at 8:57 am to
quote:

“Whatever is required” will never be the standard—


For compliance.

yes.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram