Started By
Message

re: The idea that the destruction of The Library of Alexandria set knowledge back centuries

Posted on 9/15/24 at 7:47 am to
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
58831 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 7:47 am to
quote:

The idea that the destruction of The Library of Alexandria set knowledge back centuries



Was the secret to the New Iberia haircut in the collection?


Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
34614 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

quote:

The Pantheon in Rome was built 2000 years ago. It has a domed roof. In the 1500s a big church was built in Florence but the domed roof was not finished for over 100 years because nobody knew how to do that any more.


This is again incorrect.

It’s not that people didn’t know how to do it, it’s that people didn’t do it for reasons of wealth, time, manpower etc…

Also, I dk how this has anything to do with the library at Alexandria, in fact it proves my point.

People don’t build domes, blame books that were destroyed in a library on a different continent than where the most famous dome was built


It’s pretty well known that they didn’t know how to finish the Duomo in Florence. But yes, it was not because of the library not being there.

A lot of issues led to it. Walls didn’t contain buttresses. The plague and population loss. Invasion and fall of Rome. Loss of handed down knowledge due to population loss.

It took something like 400 years to finish the Duomo with multiple architects.
This post was edited on 9/15/24 at 11:08 am
Posted by Bluefin
The Banana Stand
Member since Apr 2011
13392 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 10:55 am to
It’s likely that the most valuable texts that were lost were Greek tragedies and philosophical works. It’s also probable that most of the content in the Library were copies of trade logs and commerce activity, which would be cool to have knowledge of these days, but isn’t particularly crucial for human advancement.

The problem is that these things probably wouldn’t have survived even if the Library hadn’t been destroyed because the papyrus and ink they were produced with didn’t have a long shelf life. Unless a massive copying effort took place, the ancient Greek stuff was probably deteriorating by the early AD years and largely would’ve been lost anyway.
Posted by RandySavage
Member since May 2012
33562 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 10:57 am to
I chuckled.
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
57551 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Saw some people online talking about Buddha being black. Add the first Buddhists to your list

Maybe it's just anecdotal, but a lot of these claims seem to come from black people that were raised in Western nations.


I’ve seen claims and interviews from multiple black Americans claiming all sorts of outlandish things pertaining to heritage and inventions. Almost always, it’s being done as leverage for reparations.

“White people shouldn’t be allowed to use (practically everything ever invented) things invented by black people until reparations are paid.”
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
34614 posts
Posted on 9/15/24 at 11:15 am to
I do wonder if it contained accounts of the Sea People. Those could tell us who they were and more accounts of why we had the collapse of the Bronze Age. It would have been about 1,200 years after the Sea People, so it’s possible that might be a mystery we could solve with some of those lost texts.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram