re: The average price of a CryptoPunk NFT is $188,767.12

Why bother owning the Mona Lisa when you can just hang a copy of it on your wall? Try to look past the “artwork” being sold as NFTs and consider the implications of a distributed world wide ledger that no central entity controls.

quote:

---

My question: what is the end game for this

---

Don't be the last one holding the potato

I think its psychotic the entire idea of it and I own more nfts than the average person should have

Serial numbered jpegs which may or may not still be hosted are not for me. However once pulsechain launches all your NFT’s will be copied. So you’ll have a copy on both chains. Will they be worth the same?

quote:

---

But it’s not like that though, right? Because in your example you physically own/have the product or item. And with NFT shite, you don’t physically have anything. You “own” it in name only and can’t “use” it (like even with a piece of art you can admire it in person if it’s yours).

---

That's why I said "more akin". It's about as close an analogy as you can get because of the nature of the issue.

quote:

---

I’m not even sure what you’re getting at.

---

Just pointing out the difference between looking at a copy of a piece of art and proving ownership of the original.

The NFT is proof of ownership while anyone can look at a copy of the image. Why seemingly worthless images are going for so much begs the same question as why a banana duct taped to a wall went for so much.