- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:42 pm to SG_Geaux
That entire thing is just ridiculous
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:42 pm to MoreLandshark
quote:
It doesn't say that North Korea has nuclear submarines. I'm sure most if not all of theirs are still diesel
My statement still stands
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:43 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
I find it really hard to believe that North Korea has 78 nuclear submarines. Hell I find it hard to believe they have 1.
I just looked and it doesn't say nuclear, just subs
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:52 pm to hawgfaninc
I can't see shite.
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 10:53 pm
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:53 pm to hawgfaninc
This simply requires no explanation.
/thread
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:54 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
South Korea - 9
North Korea - 35
Um, South Korea may have double the North's population but, other than that, the North has pretty much all other advantages in a head-to-head match-up.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 10:54 pm to lsu480
quote:
just looked and it doesn't say nuclear, just subs
That is probably the sub to steal if you only had an hour to disappear.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:01 pm to hawgfaninc
Calling bullshite on China and US manpower.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:03 pm to hawgfaninc
I love how he just said "frick it" and didn't give a shite about fixing it.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:04 pm to lsu480
quote:
Since when has the US had 145 million people in the military? Are you retarded or did you not even glance at the infographic?
I'm guessing it's referring to those eligible for the draft, but who knows. That number does seem astronomically high.
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 11:06 pm
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:06 pm to pivey14
quote:
I'm guessing it's referring to those eligible for the draft.
Even that is way off unless you count men and women of draft age
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:08 pm to cave canem
quote:
Calling bullshite off the bat.
take your complaint up with business insider and their sources they listed on the bottom of the picture
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:10 pm to soccerfüt
the pic in the OP should be fixed. I rehosted it on my imgur account.
I think the pic I originally posted was could be seen by those on desktop but not mobile
I think the pic I originally posted was could be seen by those on desktop but not mobile
This post was edited on 3/1/15 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:13 pm to northshorebamaman
We are spending way way too fricking much, what 5 times more than everyone else put together
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:16 pm to goldenbadger08
quote:
Russia can have all those tanks lol.. stuck in 1940. Airplanes and Aircraft carriers is how the new war will be fought..
Umm, you don't know what you're talking about. Tanks are still extremely important for land warfare and particularly for the geopolitical context Russia exists in. There's a reason the US still has so many as well.
Also, the aircraft carrier faces extreme vulnerabilities in future warfare and has tremendous costs. They allow flexibility but are by no means necessary to exert regional power or even to effectively combat an enemy that does possess them.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 11:35 pm to hawgfaninc
First question is why in the hell do we and the Russians have 8k nukes each, that's a bit overkill. Also the only stat that matters in today's military is aircraft and navy and we have more than all the other countries combined.
Also I would love to see all these "subs" North Korea has.
Also I would love to see all these "subs" North Korea has.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News