Started By
Message

re: suing a 5 year old for rough game of tag???

Posted on 10/12/23 at 9:32 pm to
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
129246 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 9:32 pm to
quote:

But I can tell you that if another kid maliciously and intentionally physically harmed my kid

A 5 year old?
Posted by rmc
Truth or Consequences
Member since Sep 2004
27248 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 9:34 pm to
quote:

A 5 year old?


So again I’ll ask, if their 5 year old intentionally hurts my 5 year old and my 5 year old now requires let’s say something extreme - brain surgery. I am supposed to just eat that because 5 year olds are 5 year olds?

You guys have me second guessing myself. I guess it’s unreasonable to ask someone to account for their kids actions.
This post was edited on 10/12/23 at 9:35 pm
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
60693 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

trampoline


Between this and Lawn Darts, the lawyers would have lined up for those suits!
Posted by SaintsTiger
1,000,000 Posts
Member since Oct 2014
1947 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Without all the context its tough to say. But I can tell you that if another kid maliciously and intentionally physically harmed my kid to the point where I had to bring him to an ER I wouldn't hesitate to sue his parents.


Sorry you were bullied as a kid.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62632 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

In an appeal, the parents of the injured boy and the other child had previously “twisted his fingers” while they stood in line at school.


The parents of the injured boy twisted his fingers?
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
62632 posts
Posted on 10/12/23 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

“But, there is conflicting testimony regarding whether (Child 1) had previously injured (Child 2) by twisting his fingers, whether both boys were voluntarily participating in the game of tag, and whether (Child 1)'s act of falling on (Child 2) was ‘on purpose’ or accidental,” the court wrote.


Looks to me like Kid 1 pushed Kid 2 to the ground then pounced on him. Kid 2 had a broken hip, not a brush burn so I doubt this was a childish "game of tag." Kid 1 sounds like he'll be killing cats before too long.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram