- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. Louis prosecutor ordered crime lab to reassemble Patricia McCloskey's gun
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:37 pm to SelaTiger
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:37 pm to SelaTiger
quote:
Shouldn’t matter if the gun was operational or not. But if you’re going to try to charge them, tampering with the gun is the equivalent of an attempt at framing them. Someone should be locked up.
I’m very confused. Someone tampered with the gun to make it inoperable? Why?
This post was edited on 7/22/20 at 7:39 pm
1
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:39 pm to UncleFestersLegs
“The white powder substance obtained was tested and we determined it was baking powder. Lab experts then added small amounts of fentanyl to the powder where it was retested and determined to be potent enough to violate state CDS laws”
“The suspect was found to have draino, lithium batteries, aluminum foil, and allergy medicine inside their home. After lab technicians took these items and made slight adjustment with other items in the home they were able to determine the suspect did posses a clandestine meth lab”
“The suspect was found to have draino, lithium batteries, aluminum foil, and allergy medicine inside their home. After lab technicians took these items and made slight adjustment with other items in the home they were able to determine the suspect did posses a clandestine meth lab”
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:40 pm to Oilfieldbiology
I think I am misunderstanding all of this as well.
It reads like the police took the gun and found it inoperable, which is noted. Then looked to see why it was inoperable, corrected, and found it could be operated.
I don't see how they are hiding what they did. The defense can still argue it was inoperable at the time and it is on the prosecution to prove when the owner made it inoperable, if they ever did.
It reads like the police took the gun and found it inoperable, which is noted. Then looked to see why it was inoperable, corrected, and found it could be operated.
I don't see how they are hiding what they did. The defense can still argue it was inoperable at the time and it is on the prosecution to prove when the owner made it inoperable, if they ever did.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:41 pm to fightin tigers
Apparently they used it as a prop in court, they knew it was not operational.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:44 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Not being obtuse, trying to figure out reasoning behind keeping a gun inoperable then using it for self defense.
Most likely didn't want to file for a CCL/Pistol permit but wanted it nearby if he ever needed it.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:45 pm to ItzMe1972
That wasn’t an AK.
This post was edited on 7/22/20 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:48 pm to Saltwatersoul04
I think that was a joke.
As for the pistol, it would be mighty ballsy to walk out and confront a mob with an inoperable pistol.
But I’m also in the camp they didn’t do a damn thing wrong.
As for the pistol, it would be mighty ballsy to walk out and confront a mob with an inoperable pistol.
But I’m also in the camp they didn’t do a damn thing wrong.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:51 pm to Remulan
quote:
Apparently they used it as a prop in court, they knew it was not operational.
Ah, that makes it pretty easy enough to explain off why the gun was in the shape it was in. What difference does it make if everyone agrees the gun was able to be fired when reversing these? If they were going to argue the gun was inoperable the reasoning why it was inoperable was certainly going to come up.
It kind of hurts the part of their case that they felt threatened I guess. Using a non-working gun in that situation seems kind of dumb, but maybe they figured just the look was enough to intimidate.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:52 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
As for the pistol, it would be mighty ballsy to walk out and confront a mob with an inoperable pistol.
But I’m also in the camp they didn’t do a damn thing wrong.
This is where I am at this point.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 7:58 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Most likely didn't want to file for a CCL/Pistol permit but wanted it nearby if he ever needed it.
Missouri is a constitutional-carry state.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 8:03 pm to UncleFestersLegs
I see nothing wrong with this.
-Korkstand
-Korkstand
Posted on 7/22/20 at 8:05 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
reads like the police took the gun and found it inoperable, which is noted. Then looked to see why it was inoperable, corrected, and found it could be operated.
I’m reading that a prog filth ADA ordered evidence altered.
Posted on 7/22/20 at 8:10 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Defendant knew his wife was a retard and incapable of properly holding a gun without accidentally shooting him and most likely kept it that way on purpose.
FIFY
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News