- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St. George and Central should get together and build a trail along the Amite
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:04 pm to FCP
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:04 pm to FCP
quote:
That said, what's up with the sliver of St.G. boundary that juts all the way north, past I-12, 190, and the RR tracks? There's got to be a reason for that, huh?
Probably to share a boundary with Central, but also possibly due to a real estate prospector. Maybe plan B is to get annexed into Central.
This post was edited on 10/31/19 at 9:05 pm
0
Posted on 10/31/19 at 9:29 pm to BeepNode
They should build a loop first
Posted on 10/31/19 at 10:33 pm to TigerRob20
Where will Bawesome St be located?
Posted on 11/1/19 at 9:57 am to BeepNode
Zachary school district is expanded beyond city as well I think (and maybe Baker as well).
Were their final boundaries drawn up before districts official created with state constitutional amendment process and statewide vote or after districts created through the amendment process?
Wondering if EBR gave up additional area in some kind of allowed negotiation after votes creating Zachary and Central school districts or if boundaries have to also be created as part constitutional amendment process and are drawn up and known before put on ballot and voted on and can’t be changed without same process.
You would think if in future there is any development in areas in north or parish are better served by Zachary and/or Central school districts and EBR district actually agrees there would be a simpler process that didn’t involve a state wide constitutional amendment vote.
Were their final boundaries drawn up before districts official created with state constitutional amendment process and statewide vote or after districts created through the amendment process?
Wondering if EBR gave up additional area in some kind of allowed negotiation after votes creating Zachary and Central school districts or if boundaries have to also be created as part constitutional amendment process and are drawn up and known before put on ballot and voted on and can’t be changed without same process.
You would think if in future there is any development in areas in north or parish are better served by Zachary and/or Central school districts and EBR district actually agrees there would be a simpler process that didn’t involve a state wide constitutional amendment vote.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News