re: So cancel culture is okay now?

quote:

---

Explain cancel culture which is dependent on consequences

---

Youre trying to compare "canceling" someone for not wearing a mask to "canceling" someone who advocates murdering political opponents.

Youre in way over your head.

quote:

---

Who is the phony religious type?

---

I’m referring to people on here… and Kirk to an extent… did believe everything thing he said was biblical sound??

quote:

---

and Kirk to an extent

---

Explain this one.

quote:

---

I’m referring to people on here… and Kirk to an extent

---

Holy fricking cow.

You people are unbelievable. The lies and fairy tales you believe in order to feel less guilty about your retard philosophy.

Yes, everyone who shares different views than you is "phony." Do you know how fricking stupid that is, and by virtue you are?

quote:

---

Oh no!!!!! What’s going to happen to me

---

I imagine some twink will be piledriving you tonight as you watch videos of Charlie being shot.

quote:

---

Cancel culture is wrong period. Conservatives didn’t like cancel culture and spoke out against it before Kirk was murdered and even campaigned against it. But wait, now it’s useful and they like it. That’s hypocrisy. Oh but our reason is more righteous. Doesn’t matter. If it’s wrong, it’s wrong. Get it through your thick skulls.

---

Those are just the rules of the game now. Similar to NIL, a lot of people don't like it, but those are the rules now, so everyone plays by them.

The left didnt start out trying to cancel everything. It started with calling out some really heinous shite and expanded from there. It will be interesting to see if the same thing happens with this. Based on Bondi's remarks, the answer is probably yes.

quote:

---

Yes, everyone who shares different views than you is "phony."

---

Who said that

quote:

---

I get calling out public officials and servants for their comments. But ultimate it should be the employer of that private company, if not a public official etc to clean up their trash. And if they don't bring it into work, then what is the issue?

---

What if it is someone in public, with no job? A student? A man on a train who turns his head while a woman bleeds to death? At what point are people held accountable for true evil or encouraging it?

You keep mentioning private companies.

What about all those that are celebrating CK's murder who do not contribute to society, but want to get in our face and threaten violence? While we act rational? I am not being obtuse, I am truly curious. When does the tide turn and how does it happen with no violence?

quote:

---

It is simply that we are being hypocrites by engaging in their tactics that we condemned.

---

Let's say this a different way...

When you say tactics, you mean the aspect of culture that would "Self-police," actively to moderate /change/enforce culture. This is what "cancel culture" is doing.

And, then, you believe Conservatives disagreed with previous versions of cancel culture because they don't like the tactic? As usual, liberals play the name change game and make everything more complicated.

First, I'd say: "Cancel Culture" is not a real thing, it's society using social media the way they should use their dollars, unfortunately. And using emotional appeal to do "hold people responsible," for their actions. I don't think Conservatives are against holding people responsible for their actions, or even their words, if they drift from what is culturally and morally important. They shouldn't suffer legal recourse of course, but they shouldn't dodge all repercussions.

The problem is, what actions are people being held accountable for?

That was the issue.

Both sides would be hypocritical to say they don't want to encourage/support/inspire people to live in a particular way. But you're talking about two completely different sets of actions even if the method was the same - speech. It isn't about the method at all.