- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:44 pm to 7thWardTiger
i suck at math but im pretty awesome at social studies
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:45 pm to lsupride87
Mick please continue to argue 
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:45 pm to lsupride87
Am I right or wrong?
Honestly don't know
Honestly don't know
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:46 pm to The Mick
Dude it is 58. Look at the calculator at the top of the page. It is typed out exactly the same as the OP. The answer the way the equation is written is only 58
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:49 pm to lsupride87
How do you know if the +4 is part of the divisor or not?
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:50 pm to The Mick
It isn't. It isn't inside the parenthesis. Are you really now arguing with a scientific calculator?
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:51 pm to lsupride87
When I did it in my head i got 3.6
On my calculator I got 58
On my calculator I got 58
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:52 pm to lsupride87
No just asking. If the +4 was part of the divisor then it's 3.6 correct?
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:53 pm to Cap Crunch
That is exactly my point people are doing three different problems because there is lack of appropriate formatting. I was just trying to show why there were three different answers.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:54 pm to 7thWardTiger
10 baw
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:55 pm to The Mick
To be assumed as part of the division the equation would need to be written as
2
-------
3+4
When it is written as 2/2(3)+4 you as a human are making an assumption it is. Do not make assumptions, this is math no philosophy. That is what every calculator in the world will tell you the answer is 58
2
-------
3+4
When it is written as 2/2(3)+4 you as a human are making an assumption it is. Do not make assumptions, this is math no philosophy. That is what every calculator in the world will tell you the answer is 58
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:55 pm to wbeagle03
Thank you. It's a fricked up layout and unclear. It could be 58, 10, or 3.6
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:55 pm to wbeagle03
There is only 1 answer
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:56 pm to wbeagle03
quote:
That is exactly my point people are doing three different problems because there is lack of appropriate formatting. I was just trying to show why there were three different
Yet the OP put the word "simple" in his title even though it's anything but, lotta "gotcha" attempts in this thread by people who think they're smarter than everybody else
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:56 pm to fleaux
The only answer to the written equation is 58 guys. One has to make further assumptions to turn it into 3.6 or 10
This post was edited on 7/5/15 at 9:57 pm
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:58 pm to 7thWardTiger
Mathmatically, it's 10. Moronically, you can get all kinds of dumbass answers.
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:59 pm to Casty McBoozer
Exactly
Posted on 7/5/15 at 9:59 pm to 7thWardTiger
3.6
Posted on 7/5/15 at 10:01 pm to lsupride87
I'm older than computerized math problems but how would you write the problem with 2*3+4 all in the divisor?
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News