- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Question about "gun free zones"
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:02 am to Brosef Stalin
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:02 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
Its good to be gay. Its not good to carry a gun.
If you live in MS, the opposite is true.
0
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:10 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Businesses can deny you a right granted by our constitution.
They freaking aren't doing that! A "gun free zone" does not deny one single freaking right by the Constitution. That is amazing that you think that's what it does.
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:10 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Businesses can deny...a right
quote:I think the distinction is pretty obvious. They probably won't let you drag a printing press in there, either. Or a camera crew. Or a marching band. Or a church service. Or an organized protest. There are tons of 'rights' a business can tell you to check at the door, which is very different from telling YOU to GTFO.
They can not deny you
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:14 am to CharlieDay
I mean it really depends on interpretation. The Gun-Free School Zone Act was ruled unconstitutional originally, and the law stands under what many consider to be a loophole to the Commerce Clause.
Basically says that because the guns have moved in or otherwise affects interstate commerce. Pretty broad
Basically says that because the guns have moved in or otherwise affects interstate commerce. Pretty broad
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:31 am to WhoDat37
quote:
The Gun-Free School Zone Act was ruled unconstitutional originally
Not because it violated an individual right, but because Congress lacked authority.
Posted on 4/22/16 at 11:43 am to Speedy G
What would you call imposing restrictions on citizens without authority?
Posted on 4/22/16 at 12:06 pm to WhoDat37
quote:Overreach. Same thing you call Congress doing anything they aren't constitutionally authorized to do.
What would you call imposing restrictions on citizens without authority?
Lopez didn't even mention the second amendment. Didn't matter if it was guns or cantaloupes. The only question was whether Congress had authority under the commerce clause. That decision adds nothing to the discussion of gun free zones and individual rights.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News