- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:40 am to East Coast Band
So Paul Harvey was the devil?
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:44 am to SlushPuppie
quote:
what an absolute clown
He was right on. The devil = Marxism.
Destroy families, culture, values, then reprogram.
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:50 am to SlushPuppie
quote:
what an absolute clown
Where is he wrong?
Posted on 3/21/20 at 11:05 am to TigerFanInSouthland
Posted on 3/21/20 at 11:13 am to Joshjrn
Aw, just downvotes, no replies? No one wants to claim that Mr. Harvey was actually psychic and foresaw the use of drug dogs in schools before drug dogs even existed?
For frick's sake, people. His original monologue is fine. Plenty of red meat in there for you. But the whole purpose of the monologue, as evidenced by the last line, is to cover things that are already fricking happening. There's no need to pretend that his monologues from the 1960's predicted the future, or shame in acknowledging that he updated his monologues for the next several decades, because again, the whole point was that everything in the monologue was supposed to already be happening.
For frick's sake, people. His original monologue is fine. Plenty of red meat in there for you. But the whole purpose of the monologue, as evidenced by the last line, is to cover things that are already fricking happening. There's no need to pretend that his monologues from the 1960's predicted the future, or shame in acknowledging that he updated his monologues for the next several decades, because again, the whole point was that everything in the monologue was supposed to already be happening.
Posted on 3/21/20 at 12:28 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
For frick's sake, people. His original monologue is fine. Plenty of red meat in there for you. But the whole purpose of the monologue, as evidenced by the last line, is to cover things that are already fricking happening. There's no need to pretend that his monologues from the 1960's predicted the future, or shame in acknowledging that he updated his monologues for the next several decades, because again, the whole point was that everything in the monologue was supposed to already be happening.
I mean, I don’t see how it was such a leap for him to predict something like that.
Posted on 3/21/20 at 12:37 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
I mean, I don’t see how it was such a leap for him to predict something like that.
To predict that there would be drug dogs in schools when drug dogs hadn't been conceived of yet? Metal detectors in schools when they weren't rolled out in airports until almost a decade later?
And then to say at the end that all of these things are already happening?
He kept his monologue fresh for decades. No issue with that whatsoever. Like I said before, lot of good red meat in all of them, from first to last. It's the people pretending as though his updated monologues were actually his original monologue from the 1960's that need to stop.
Popular
Back to top


0







