Started By
Message

re: Paul Harvey 1965 Warning

Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:05 am to
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21814 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:05 am to
Og geez never seen this post before.
Posted by JCinBAMA
North of Huntsville
Member since Oct 2009
18425 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Reads like a Democrat playbook.


Watch this...

LINK ]We Were Warned: Freedom to Chains - Paul Harvey - Short Film (2017) [HD]
Posted by 1984Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Apr 2006
7738 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:40 am to
So Paul Harvey was the devil?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:44 am to
quote:

what an absolute clown

He was right on. The devil = Marxism.


Destroy families, culture, values, then reprogram.
Posted by Geauxboy
NW Arkansas
Member since Oct 2006
4856 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 10:50 am to
quote:

what an absolute clown


Where is he wrong?
Posted by Filtiger
Philippines
Member since Apr 2009
390 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 11:05 am to
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
33431 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 11:13 am to
Aw, just downvotes, no replies? No one wants to claim that Mr. Harvey was actually psychic and foresaw the use of drug dogs in schools before drug dogs even existed?

For frick's sake, people. His original monologue is fine. Plenty of red meat in there for you. But the whole purpose of the monologue, as evidenced by the last line, is to cover things that are already fricking happening. There's no need to pretend that his monologues from the 1960's predicted the future, or shame in acknowledging that he updated his monologues for the next several decades, because again, the whole point was that everything in the monologue was supposed to already be happening.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

For frick's sake, people. His original monologue is fine. Plenty of red meat in there for you. But the whole purpose of the monologue, as evidenced by the last line, is to cover things that are already fricking happening. There's no need to pretend that his monologues from the 1960's predicted the future, or shame in acknowledging that he updated his monologues for the next several decades, because again, the whole point was that everything in the monologue was supposed to already be happening.



I mean, I don’t see how it was such a leap for him to predict something like that.
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33959 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 12:35 pm to
KAVA, KAVA KAVA!
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
33431 posts
Posted on 3/21/20 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I mean, I don’t see how it was such a leap for him to predict something like that.


To predict that there would be drug dogs in schools when drug dogs hadn't been conceived of yet? Metal detectors in schools when they weren't rolled out in airports until almost a decade later?

And then to say at the end that all of these things are already happening?

He kept his monologue fresh for decades. No issue with that whatsoever. Like I said before, lot of good red meat in all of them, from first to last. It's the people pretending as though his updated monologues were actually his original monologue from the 1960's that need to stop.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram