Started By
Message

re: New Mexico mom's car seized despite no criminal charges or even accusation

Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:15 pm to
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
27507 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:15 pm to
quote:

I wouldn't have even got mad


Yes you would've. Imagine the inconvenience of suddenly not having a car as it relates to getting to work, grocery shopping, etc
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82331 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

This is a good case to take to SCOTUS to get civil asset forfeiture tossed out onto the ashes of history.


That would require the SCOTUS to do the right thing and respect the Bill of Rights.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85484 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 6:47 pm to
One would think the city would just give her back the damn car and avoid the lawsuit.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21836 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

How can she be forced to sign over something that doesn't belong to her? It belongs to the entity shes's making payments to, not her.


That's not true, at least here. In NY the buyer is the title holder, but with liens placed on it from whoever financed it.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21836 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

One would think the city would just give her back the damn car and avoid the laws


It's bigger than that- the city makes $8M/year from car seizures. If they give ground here they lose their cash cow.

They have to keep seizing cars to keep the city running.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
23313 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

it illegally seized her car on only suspicion of a crime


Except that DWI is actually a crime.

She won't win this.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21836 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:44 pm to
quote:

Except that DWI is actually a crime.

She won't win this.



A couple of items:

1)The city ordinance that justifies this seizure is in direct conflict with state law. State laws allows seizures only after conviction- not before.

2)She wasn't arrested for any crime or even accused of one. Police agree she's completely innocent. Also most states and even the federal government have provisions in their civil asset forfeiture statutes that have innocent owner provisions. In other words if the owner didn't know or didn't have reason to know a crime was being committed, the property shouldn't be seized.
This post was edited on 9/8/16 at 7:46 pm
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
25123 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Except that DWI is actually a crime.


a crime in which the vehicle will provide no benefit to the prosecution unless her son murdered someone with/in it
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85484 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

It's bigger than that- the city makes $8M/year from car seizures. If they give ground here they lose their cash cow.


They couldve quietly given her back the damn car and no one else would've ever known about this issue. Now they're taking an unreasonable and unsympathetic hard line stance which is both public and probably unwinnable for the city.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33146 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 8:07 pm to
Yeah, they may get that car but now their arse is out in the open about stealing property from people. This policy may come to an end or at least significantly scale down if this story gets big enough.
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 8:46 pm to
while they turn a blind eye to drug and human trafficking.
Posted by CtotheVrzrbck
WeWaCo
Member since Dec 2007
37538 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 8:50 pm to
man that would be so awesome if they made an episode in the coming season that used this case as part of the storyline.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
46425 posts
Posted on 9/8/16 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

It's criminal and needs to go. It shouldn't take SCOTUS. This was created in the Legislature and they can kill it. Our elected officials need to quit writing stupid SJW special protected classes laws and take care of this.


This right here.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram