- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: National Flood Insurance Program set to expire in 2 weeks
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:37 pm to LSUsmartass
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:37 pm to LSUsmartass
Good. The government needs to stop subsidizing real estate.
While at it they should stop giving loans, grants, etc to people.
Let the real estate market be driven by actual market forces.
While at it they should stop giving loans, grants, etc to people.
Let the real estate market be driven by actual market forces.
This post was edited on 7/20/18 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:37 pm to Sao
quote:
Because inches not feet matter in Louisiana maybe? The 2016 flood thread was actually charting rise inch by inch because everyone is so low.
i have no idea what you are trying to say nor imply.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:39 pm to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Renewals are sent out 60 days prior to renewal date and will continue being sent out as normal until the NFIP lapses. Once your renewal invoice is sent out, you can still renew even if your renewal date is after the lapse. However once the NFIP lapses, renewal billing will stop until the program is reinstated. So the earliest renewals that would be affected would be renewal dates 60 days or more after the NFIP lapse date.
And what will the mortgage company have to say if there is no renewal?
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:39 pm to Chad504boy
Floodstage. Watched by the inch not by feet. Simple.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:40 pm to LSUsmartass
copy and pasting this email i found
NFIP Re-authorization Extended Until July 31, 2018 and Separated from Federal Spending Authorization Cycle
This week, for the sixth time since the beginning of the fiscal year, Congress voted to authorize federal spending and to extend the authorization of the NFIP. In each of the prior extensions federal spending and NFIP re-authorization were extended to the same date. This week, however, House Majority leadership, including Speaker Ryan, decoupled NFIP re authorization from "must pass" federal spending and set the next NFIP re-authorization deadline on July 31st - immediately before Congress recesses for its long August recess. In the same vote, Congress authorized federal spending through September 30th.
Though congressional supporters of decoupling NFIP re-authorization from the spending authorization cycle insist their motivation is to add additional focus to necessary NFIP reforms, few believe Congress will conclude comprehensive NFIP reform and re-authorization legislation by July 31.
Should Congress be unable to meet the July 31 deadline, history suggests an increased likelihood of an NFIP lapse when NFIP re-authorization is decoupled from federal spending. Previous lapses, under similar circumstances, left property owners at risk and real estate transactions in jeopardy.
Up next:
Wright Flood will continue to work in Washington to inform and advocate for the long term re-authorization of the NFIP, simplified access to flood loss prevention and mitigation and to stabilize the real estate market in the US. In light of this week's congressional action, Wright Flood will also work to assure that future short-term NFIP re-authorizations are again coupled with authorization of federal spending.
What you can do:
Please stay in touch with Wright Flood for continuing information and to respond quickly should we need your political action on this issue in the future. In the coming weeks and months, should you have contact with your Senators of Member of Congress, please express your concern that Congress not allow the NFIP to lapse following the current July 31 re-authorization deadline.
NFIP Re-authorization Extended Until July 31, 2018 and Separated from Federal Spending Authorization Cycle
This week, for the sixth time since the beginning of the fiscal year, Congress voted to authorize federal spending and to extend the authorization of the NFIP. In each of the prior extensions federal spending and NFIP re-authorization were extended to the same date. This week, however, House Majority leadership, including Speaker Ryan, decoupled NFIP re authorization from "must pass" federal spending and set the next NFIP re-authorization deadline on July 31st - immediately before Congress recesses for its long August recess. In the same vote, Congress authorized federal spending through September 30th.
Though congressional supporters of decoupling NFIP re-authorization from the spending authorization cycle insist their motivation is to add additional focus to necessary NFIP reforms, few believe Congress will conclude comprehensive NFIP reform and re-authorization legislation by July 31.
Should Congress be unable to meet the July 31 deadline, history suggests an increased likelihood of an NFIP lapse when NFIP re-authorization is decoupled from federal spending. Previous lapses, under similar circumstances, left property owners at risk and real estate transactions in jeopardy.
Up next:
Wright Flood will continue to work in Washington to inform and advocate for the long term re-authorization of the NFIP, simplified access to flood loss prevention and mitigation and to stabilize the real estate market in the US. In light of this week's congressional action, Wright Flood will also work to assure that future short-term NFIP re-authorizations are again coupled with authorization of federal spending.
What you can do:
Please stay in touch with Wright Flood for continuing information and to respond quickly should we need your political action on this issue in the future. In the coming weeks and months, should you have contact with your Senators of Member of Congress, please express your concern that Congress not allow the NFIP to lapse following the current July 31 re-authorization deadline.
This post was edited on 7/20/18 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:40 pm to Sao
quote:
Floodstage. Watched by the inch not by feet. Simple.
Happens for any flood.
You're neglecting that inches matter when a flood is about to crest.
This post was edited on 7/20/18 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:41 pm to Sao
so those by the inch did not seek bailouts when they voluntarily had no flood insurance?
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:41 pm to LSUsmartass
The sad part of this are the people, who never flooded before, who now need flood insurance because of poor development planning brought on by the flood insurance program.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:46 pm to ForeverLSU02
quote:
I don't live in a flood zone and neither did 50% of the people who flooded in 2016
Which has nothing to do with this program. FEMA bailed your arse out, not the flood insurance program, unless you bought flood insurance in a non flood zone.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:47 pm to Sao
I 'don't live in a floodzone' (floodzone X) and am still required by the federal government to buy flood insurance.
Have never had standing water on my property and from my knowledge there has never been a flood claim.
Have never had standing water on my property and from my knowledge there has never been a flood claim.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:48 pm to LSUsmartass
quote:
And what will the mortgage company have to say if there is no renewal?
It won't get to that. If the NFIP lapse lasted more than a week or 2, the public pressure on Congress will be too great because it kills the real estate market. They'd have to do another short term re-authorization and kick the can down the road a few more months.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:53 pm to biglego
quote:
Not nearly as important as Trump literally handing over the reins of government to Putin
Isnt that what you democrats want?
I mena youre trying to hand californias govt over to illegal immigrants so what does this matter?
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:54 pm to ForeverLSU02
quote:
I don't live in a flood zone and neither did 50% of the people who flooded in 2016
Everyone is in a flood zone. Around 25-30% of flood claims every year come from low risk zones like you're talking about.
Low risk =/= no risk
Posted on 7/20/18 at 2:59 pm to biglego
Remember when Trump rolled up to Denham Springs post flood with play doh. That’s our president, folks.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 3:21 pm to LSUsmartass
quote:
How big of a deal is this? What happens to those of us in flood zones if this expires? Seems like a big deal but not much news coverage.
Easy for LA, TX, and MS. If you live south of I-10, you are in a flood area and need flood insurance.
If you live with a few miles of a river, you need flood insurance.
And so on. If you can see water, you need insurance. The program is $20 BILLION in the hole because WON'T get cheap flood insurance and, instead, rely upon the government (you and me) to cover their losses. That needs to stop.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 3:22 pm to ForeverLSU02
quote:
quote:
Move out of a flood zone and stop relying on government bailout
I don't live in a flood zone and neither did 50% of the people who flooded in 2016
Those areas should have been in flood zones. Too much politics in the program and not enough common sense.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 3:26 pm to Alltheway Tigers!
quote:
Those areas should have been in flood zones. Too much politics in the program and not enough common sense.
You're talking to an empty crowd at this point.. I tossed in a few facts on page 2 and it's gone silent.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 4:23 pm to Phil A Sheo
quote:
Plus a house on a hill like that has other concerns caused by water... IE: Earth Movement
Of course, but that wouldn't fall under flood insurance.
Posted on 7/20/18 at 6:17 pm to shawnlsu
quote:
Which has nothing to do with this program. FEMA bailed your arse out, not the flood insurance program, unless you bought flood insurance in a non flood zone.
Since most flood insurance is not from a private company, it all comes out of the same pot, the government.
The thing is that for many that flooded in 2016, the govt paid out tens of thousands (if not 100+ thousand) more if someone had flood insurance vs. those that didn’t and received a grant in the same neighborhood with similar flood damage.
Contractors gutted insured houses that had less than a foot of water because 1) they would get paid and 2) that’s what the insurance assessor wanted them to do.
Back to top


0




