- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: n
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:14 am to jangalang
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:14 am to jangalang
quote:
I care.
Well, I don’t care what you care about.
quote:Why stop at guns? What about iPads, the internet, drones you can buy at Walmart, two way radios or cell phones? All of those are currently being used to kill people wholesale in Ukraine.
Weapons of war should stay at war.
quote:
Comfortable civilians don’t deserve the power to attain everything they want. If you really want specialized stuff go through extra red tape and make sure the government knows about you. I have no problem with that
Dear fricking Lord. What defines “specialized stuff?” What would the government knowing do to stop anything?
quote:. Then we should put a $200 tax on voting too. The concept is literally no different.
Apparently our government applied a 200 dollar tax to anyone that wanted the opportunity to then buy the Tommy Gun. That’s fricking genius.
0
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:15 am to jangalang
quote:
Which one?
Any of them. You’ve avoided them because you don’t have the intellectual ability to keep up.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:15 am to Ross
quote:
I’m not reading 50 pages. Is this a term with a clear and consistent definition?
Not at all. But there are setups and manipulations than can be banned and should continue to be banned.
Nobody is hunting with 50 rounds of 7.62 in a drum.
Look at this video:
LINK
7.62 drums only helps make this possible and 7.62 would be a real annihilatlor. frick your reloads.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:17 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Any of them. You’ve avoided them because you don’t have the intellectual ability to keep up.
I tend to lean to conversations that are not completely moronic which may be why I missed your questions. Please get back in line.
This post was edited on 4/18/23 at 7:18 am
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:18 am to jangalang
quote:
Not at all. But there are setups and manipulations than can be banned and should continue to be banned.
Explain the criteria for how one should evaluate what should be banned.
quote:
frick your reloads.
Calm down.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:19 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Where do you see this? AL.com article from a day ago:
Sometimes you gotta know people.
Oh and don’t read Al.com, that shite will rot your brain. The OT provides all the news you need
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:19 am to jangalang
quote:
Nobody is hunting with 50 rounds of 7.62 in a drum.
2A has absolutely nothing to do with hunting.
You are a complete and total moron.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:28 am to Rebel
quote:
2A has absolutely nothing to do with hunting.
It has nothing to do with terrorizing our own citizens as well. We have outgrown the second amendment with tech that can make cheap, high- powered war machines that can be turned against our own populace.
Did you watch the video and imagine your teenager being there, not knowing where the shots are coming from and not knowing which way to go to get behind cover. Do you want that reality for everyone? Reality is mass shootings are trending upwards in steep, convincing fashion while morality crumbles.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:36 am to Ross
quote:
Explain the criteria for how one should evaluate what should be banned.
Common sense mainly. I would cap any magazine for a high powered rifle above 6 (.308)at maybe 15. That’s beyond reasonable.
If people want 7.62 why do they need 50 round drums? They are obviously not hunting nor doing target practice. They only serve one purpose well.
This post was edited on 4/18/23 at 7:38 am
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:37 am to jangalang
quote:
jangalang
"Shall not be infringed"
now frick off, traitor.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:37 am to jangalang
quote:
Common sense mainly
"Common sense" dictates that mag caps will do absolutely nothing.
Its an emotional overreaction just to "do something."
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:39 am to jangalang
quote:
They are obviously not hunting nor doing target practice. They only serve one purpose well.
You might need to reread the constitution.
Come back when you do.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:40 am to PureBlood
quote:
now frick off, traitor.
He's a pretend gun owner who is afraid of guns.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:42 am to jangalang
quote:
Common sense mainly. I would cap any magazine for a high powered rifle above 6 at maybe 15. That’s beyond reasonable.
It’s reasonable to you, others could, and seems like do, disagree. I don’t think it’s wise or productive to presume convergence on this issue before it’s been achieved.
To your main point, there is no Constitutional right that is unbounded in American society. We rescind people’s rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness regularly through various enforcements of various laws. However, you are seeking to draw a line in the sand on the right to bare arms based on “common sense”, but it doesn’t really seem like it is common sense because it doesn’t seem like you’ve been able to achieve a consensus on this issue. I think you ought to find a framework for which you can identify a premise everyone actually does agree on and seek to find what ought to be banned from within a logically consistent framework, to whatever degree that’s possible.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:43 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Its an emotional overreaction just to "do something."
It’s an overdue reaction to something extremely concerning other than the usual “thoughts and prayers.”
quote:
"Common sense" dictates that mag caps will do absolutely nothing.
This is a lie. People can only carry so much on their person…. I understand combat loads better than you. Why allow them to carry 50 round clips at the convenience of one reload? Make them haul 5 magazines and force them to reload constantly.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:43 am to Ross
quote:
, but it doesn’t really seem like it is common sense because it doesn’t seem like you’ve been able to achieve a consensus on this issue.
Correct. Common sense is practical. There's absolutely nothing practical about mag caps.
Just buy more mags. Takes three seconds to pop one and reload.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:44 am to jangalang
quote:
frick your reloads.
And frick your opinions which are entirely irrelevant.
I do have one question for you though….does this thread make you cry or make you cum? I honestly can’t imagine why someone would keep coming back to a place that continuously beats the frick out of you unless there’s some sick masochistic pleasure you’re getting out of this.
Every single point you’ve tried to make is hilariously wrong, misinformed, or flat-put irrelevant.
I say irrelevant because your opinion doesn’t fricking matter.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:45 am to jangalang
quote:
People can only carry so much on their person…. I understand combat loads better than you. Why allow them to carry 50 round clips at the convenience of one reload? Make them haul 5 magazines and force them to reload constantly.
BWAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahhAh you’re so fricking stupid.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:46 am to jangalang
quote:
It’s an overdue reaction
Fueled by estrogen.
The far left wants to make ammo unattainable for the common man. Your movement is a womans movement not based on reason.
What you are advocating for, is a robust and violent black market where cartels control firearms and ammo, not the legal dealers.
Posted on 4/18/23 at 7:47 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Just buy more mags. Takes three seconds to pop one and reload
The idiot has absolutely no clue that drum mags are actually a pain in the arse from a tactic standpoint.
Page 53 of 74
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News