- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: n
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:12 pm to fallguy_1978
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:12 pm to fallguy_1978
quote:
That poster listed a bunch of guns he owns but he wants to make ownership or operating them more difficult. It's a strange stance.
Operating them? No ma’am.
Owning them? Sure.
But then again I’m a law abiding citizen not looking for trouble 100% of the time.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:12 pm to jangalang
quote:
We have to make sure we are fit to drive cars every so often
You aren't required to have a license to own and operate a car.
Not that it matters with that pesky Constitution and all that.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:13 pm to jangalang
quote:
Operating them? No ma’am.
Owning them? Sure.
so what you're saying is you don't want a mentally ill person owning a gun but you're ok with a mentally ill person firing a gun.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:14 pm to pankReb
quote:
If people can go through the red tape to legally drive a car, they can go through an extended process for buying gas.
It’s incredible you are bringing this up again.
Nobody is trying to deter people from buying gas that is needed immediately.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:15 pm to jangalang
quote:
Nobody is trying to deter people from buying gas that is needed immediately.
I think we've got enough evidence here to red flag you for being a retard.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:16 pm to jangalang
quote:
It’s incredible you are bringing this up again.
I had to because you just don't get it.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:16 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I think we've got enough evidence here to red flag you for being a retard.
I personally don't trust his mental capacity for him to own a firearm.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:17 pm to pankReb
quote:
so what you're saying is you don't want a mentally ill person owning a gun but you're ok with a mentally ill person firing a gun.
So you’re shite for brains. Hi.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:18 pm to Centinel
quote:
I think journalists need to undergo background checks anytime they want to use the internet to publish their articles.
I mean did the founders really intend for journalists to have access to high speed military grade communications?
It will only take a few minutes. No big deal at all.
If this was the case journalism would have had a better chance to remain what it was supposed to be rather than becoming the inanity in pursuit of clicks and ad dollars it is now and tools for hyperpartisanship.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:18 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
I think we've got enough evidence here to red flag you for being a retard.
Because I think your meme stance is retarded?
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:19 pm to jangalang
quote:
If people can go through red tape to own special equipment like silencers or full auto they can go through an extended process for buying ammo.
So, you think buying ammo should require a Form 4?
JFC...and that's "common sense" to you?
You think buying .22LR for my squirrel gun should require the same regulations as buying an M2 .50 cal?
This post was edited on 4/17/23 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:19 pm to jangalang
quote:
Nobody is trying to deter people from buying gas that is needed immediately
But, I really need that ammo IMMEDIATELY!!!
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:19 pm to jangalang
quote:
Nobody is trying to deter people from buying gas that is needed immediately.
So hypothetically speaking, who decides if someone needs gas and then who decides if they need it immediately?
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:20 pm to jangalang
quote:
so what you're saying is you don't want a mentally ill person owning a gun but you're ok with a mentally ill person firing a gun.
So you’re shite for brains. Hi.
quote:
That poster listed a bunch of guns he owns but he wants to make ownership or operating them more difficult. It's a strange stance.
Operating them? No ma’am.
Owning them? Sure.
You quite literally said you don't want to make operating them more difficult but want to make owning them more difficult. You said that....No one else....just you.
These words came from you.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:21 pm to jangalang
quote:
Operating them? No ma’am.
Having to do a federal background check every time I want to go shoot is making it more difficult in my book.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:22 pm to kengel2
quote:
So hypothetically speaking, who decides if someone needs gas and then who decides if they need it immediately?
I think we should have 9-14 month background check waits every time someone wants to vote. I also want a say in determining who passes and fails that background check.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:22 pm to jangalang
quote:
Show me your legal fully automatic weapons.
Let’s start there.
Look, retard. Just because the government has already infringed on our rights doesn't mean they should get to continue to make you feel better about yourself.
If you knew how to read it would be obvious what the purpose of the amendment is and why.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:22 pm to jangalang
quote:
Because I think your meme stance is retarded?
No, because you have the cognitive function of a legit retard.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:24 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
So, you think buying ammo should require a Form 4? JFC...and that's "common sense" to you?
Wait period, background check, they’re all fair game if you ask me.
How bad do you need ammo and can you plan appropriately? Either way your “rights” aren’t being infringed upon.
Posted on 4/17/23 at 4:24 pm to pankReb
This dude has never been through a hurricane or any sort of government controlled event.
Popular
Back to top



2







