- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/14/20 at 9:00 pm to Tigear
quote:We could have the same firm that built the bypass in BR do this.
What would happen if we built a damn somewhere north of LA? Say perhaps Memphis or even St. Louis.
Geographically, economically, etc.
Discuss.
I predict it’ll be under budget and on-time.
OP: u r stoopit
Look up “acre feet” and calculate that capacity with specific regard to the Lower Mississippi River delta.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 10:26 pm to forever lsu30
quote:
Is the Ms River too filthy in the lower half to build hydroelectric dams that still allow flow down to the Gulf?
Part of the old river structure is a hydroelectric dam. A quite large one at that.
Posted on 9/14/20 at 10:28 pm to Tigear
The Bonnet Carre Spillway would only open once a year for four months
Posted on 9/14/20 at 10:32 pm to Tigear
It would be the tributaries that you'd need to look at first. Damming and backflooding those rivers and streams first. Some of those rivers are massive in their own right.
Only then could you even conceive of damming Old Man River
Only then could you even conceive of damming Old Man River
Posted on 9/14/20 at 10:36 pm to Roman Candle Tag
Fun fact
The loss of coastal areas of Louisiana over the yars aren't due to "rising ocean levels" from global warming
It is from installations of dams and water locks along the Mississippi river
The sediment that usually nurtures the coast line and refreshes the repository of sediment is literally being stopped and with held from flowing down river by all these stops
No sediment = no land
The loss of coastal areas of Louisiana over the yars aren't due to "rising ocean levels" from global warming
It is from installations of dams and water locks along the Mississippi river
The sediment that usually nurtures the coast line and refreshes the repository of sediment is literally being stopped and with held from flowing down river by all these stops
No sediment = no land
Posted on 9/14/20 at 10:41 pm to Tigear
The number of dams upstream is already plenty, as has been pointed out. The increase in dams is why we have such high water downstream now. Folks think that we are just having more rains and more water coming down every year. The bigger issue is because of decreased flows, the sediment that normally was carried out to the gulf is getting dropped all along the River. The river bottom is ridiculously higher than it was 30-40 years ago.
Posted on 9/15/20 at 1:14 am to forever lsu30
quote:
esh water supplies would be significantly increased & could lead to bountiful farming in many "new" areas.
Besides the litany of other issues, there wouldn’t be any “new” areas created bc of all the farmland lost due to excess flooding upriver from the dam
Posted on 9/15/20 at 6:26 pm to Wishnitwas1998
wouldn't we just fill up all of the rivers & streams that feed off of the Big River already? Their levels would rise & move more water to their end locations too, right?
Just have fun with this topic. It is, after all, a hypothetical.
Just have fun with this topic. It is, after all, a hypothetical.
Posted on 9/15/20 at 6:34 pm to MidgetGolfer
quote:
You could get some damn bait?
Posted on 9/16/20 at 12:18 am to Tigear
You would fill them up.....which would flood their banks......which would submerge current farm ground
Not to mention the flooding on the MS itself
Not to mention the flooding on the MS itself
This post was edited on 9/16/20 at 12:19 am
Popular
Back to top

0






