- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Midland (TX) Police Officer killed by man who thought his home was being burglarized
Posted on 3/8/19 at 10:57 am to theunknownknight
Posted on 3/8/19 at 10:57 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Dude are you legitimately retarded or is the word IF just invisible to you?
That statement is not factual. You'd have done well to just not come back to this thread.
1
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:01 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
That statement is not factual. You'd have done well to just not come back to this thread.
You have been so outclassed in this thread you are embarrassing yourself.
Starting a statement with IF doesn’t make it a fact. It makes it more of an opinion and a hypothetical. Go read the oxford definition of IF...IF you are able to comprehend it (look at definition 5)
The bottom line is police can’t just walk in a house. It’s my opinion they need warrant of some sort (ie evidence based entry and approval).
And in ANY case - the burden of proof is on the STATE when the police walks in a home without the homeowner’s permission. That’s the law and that’s a fact.
Just take the loss and move on.
This post was edited on 3/8/19 at 11:04 am
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:03 am to theunknownknight
quote:
You have been so outclassed in this thread you are embarrassing yourself.
Outclassed how? I have not said a single thing that isn't true, and I've made zero assumptions. Retards downvoting me doesn't make that not the case
quote:
Starting a statement with IF doesn’t make it a fact. It makes it more of an opinion and a hypothetical. Go read the oxford definition of IF...IF you are able to comprehend it (look at definition 5)
That is not the point. Your statement that included if is not factual. There are other reasons that the police could have entered and not been in the wrong and invading.
quote:
he bottom line in police can’t just walk in a house
I never said they could.
quote:
It’s my opinion they need warrant of some sort (ie evidence based entry and approval).
Too bad the laws are not only made on your opinions.
quote:
ust take the loss and move on.
There is no loss for me to take. I haven't said anything wrong
This post was edited on 3/8/19 at 11:04 am
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:06 am to LNCHBOX
Your last post makes absolutely no sense.
I say this:
Then you start off with
And IMMEDIATELY follow up with this:
I say this:
quote:
Starting a statement with IF doesn’t make it a fact.
Then you start off with
quote:
That’s not the point
And IMMEDIATELY follow up with this:
quote:
Your statement that included if is not factual
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:07 am to theunknownknight
I can't help that you are so hellbent on trying to be right that you can't comprehend what is being said to you.
ETA: Let's see if I can dumb it down for you. You said this:
That statement, which includes the word "if," is not factual.
ETA: Let's see if I can dumb it down for you. You said this:
quote:
If they didn’t have a warrant and entered without permission, they were invading. Period.
That statement, which includes the word "if," is not factual.
This post was edited on 3/8/19 at 11:09 am
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:10 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I can't help that you are so hellbent on trying to be right that you can't comprehend what is being said to you.
Never forget
This post was edited on 3/8/19 at 11:11 am
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:10 am to theunknownknight
I don't know what you think that proves, but congrats I guess.
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:11 am to LNCHBOX
Thanks. I’ll be here all week 
Posted on 3/8/19 at 11:18 am to EA6B
quote:
There does not have to be a imminent threat of harm to your person. The burden of proof is your word against that of a dead man.
Except the guy didn’t kill all 4 cops. Or all 4 ‘intruders’ or all 4 ‘teenagers’.
I fully understand he can claim he ‘thought’ he was in danger. But if the police were in uniform, it’s pretty damn hard for me to believe a jury will believe him. You can’t just shoot someone without identifying them or having a reasonably idea of who they are. A cop in a uniform is not a ‘reasonable’ threat.
Page 17 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News