Started By
Message

Let's talk a little about cancer

Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:20 pm
Posted by FenrirTheBeard
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
6425 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:20 pm
According to cancer.org, In 2014, there will be an estimated 1,665,540 new cancer cases diagnosed and 585,720 cancer deaths (over 1,600/day) in the US. Cancer remains the second most common cause of death in the US, accounting for nearly 1 of every 4 deaths. The United States currently ranks 6th in cancer rates behind Norway, Belgium, Australia, France and Denmark being the highest. It seems to me that despite the modernization of medicine, cleaning of water, air pollution reduction, stringent requirements for industrial waste/byproducts, cancer rates are increasing. I know sometimes we are predisposed to cancer and our eating habits, exercise habits and God knows what else which contribute to causes (besides the obvious tobacco/alcohol-related cancers).

Many of our presidents have died of heart disease (probably a side-effect of the job), but when was the last one to die from cancer? Granted, they also have the absolute best care that we couldn’t dream of having.

That brings me to my next point. All of the advances in medicine, technology, stem cells, using viruses to help us, etc still don’t yield a “cure” for cancer. Cancer is a hundreds of billions dollar business for our economy. Could we as a country afford a cure for cancer? Beyond medical treatment, think of death taxes, estate taxes, costs for funerals, and all of the above and how it stimulates the economy.

My thoughts are that we have a cure for cancer. Those with power have access, those who don’t, don’t.

What say you?
Posted by Walt OReilly
Poplarville, MS
Member since Oct 2005
124055 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:21 pm to
Let's not

Not something I care to think about
Posted by GEAUXmedic
Premium Member
Member since Nov 2011
41598 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Let's not

Not something I care to think about

Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Many of our presidents have died of heart disease (probably a side-effect of the job), but when was the last one to die from cancer?


there haven't been that many
Posted by Turkey_Creek_Tiger
Member since Dec 2012
12343 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

My thoughts are that we have a cure for cancer. Those with power have access, those who don’t, don’t.


Didn't Steve Jobs die from cancer? He was pretty powerful.
Posted by LSUvegasbombed
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2013
15464 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:22 pm to
is your oral cancer back?
Posted by GeauxWrek
Somewhere b/w Houston and BR
Member since Sep 2010
4293 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:25 pm to
Since most cases are developed later in life, would the increase life expediency answer for some of these increased cases?
Posted by GeauxElliott
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2007
3695 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:25 pm to
Posted by MrTwoBits
Member since Oct 2013
657 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:25 pm to
I hate to make light of the topic but it reminds me of a funny story. There were a string of radio ads a while back featuring Jeff Foxworthy. The first one I heard, when I didn't know what was coming, literally made me bust out laughing IRL. It went something like this:

"Hi, I'm Jeff Foxworthy. You may remember me from funny jokes such as 'if your thanksgiving dinner is ruined by running out of ketchup, you might be a redneck'. But let me tell you what's not funny....childhood cancer."

It was like ease up jeff.
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32015 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:26 pm to
yes im sure the gubment will withold a cure for cancer to make money and allow people to die
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64328 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Let's not

Not something I care to think about



Exactly what I thought when I read the thread title.
Posted by pointdog33
Member since Jan 2012
2765 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:27 pm to
Cancer is a completely random event. And since it is random there is no cure for cancer only treatments. There are indicators that may suggest that you could get it but they aren't always right, or you may have no indicators and get it. Our current treatments target cells that replicate at a higher rate than other cells, but there are other cells in our body that rapidly divide which become causalities of the cancer treatment. So you essentially kill the body to save the body. Some people can handle the treatment and some can't.
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 1:32 pm
Posted by FenrirTheBeard
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
6425 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

yes im sure the gubment will withold a cure for cancer to make money and allow people to die


Sarcasm?

I know it's a sensitive topic, but it's a very real aspect of life. Figure I'd get some opinions.
Posted by yeti67
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2013
60 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Cancer is a completely random event. And since it is random there is no cure for cancer only treatments. There are indicators that may suggest that you could get it but they aren't always right, or you may have no indicators and get it. Our current treatments target cells that replicate at a higher rate than other cells, but they are other cells in our body that rapidly divide which become causalities of the cancer treatment. So you essentially kill the body to save the body. Some people can handle the treatment and some can't.



Take it from someone who has been going through this for three years, this is the best way to explain it. I have the best insurance, so can't say i don't have the means for the cure just haven't found the right combination of treatment yet. Every person is different.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51871 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

Those with power have access, those who don’t, don’t.


I guess Steve Jobs didn't have enough power.





Idiot.




Your example, rooted in presidents, is explained by the fact that the key to a cure of any cancer is early detection.

Don't you think they go through routine scans and checks?

Also, they make such a small cross section of the population they don't be used to make any statistics based conclusions.
This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 1:37 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64328 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:36 pm to
Seeing how caner is a random mutation, I wonder when we'll get a form of caner that is beneficial.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51871 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Seeing how caner is a random mutation, I wonder when we'll get a form of caner that is beneficial.



Don't be obtuse.

Some mutations are good, some bad, most neither.

Cancer is an example of a product of a bad one.

This post was edited on 4/21/14 at 1:39 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64328 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Don't be obtuse.

Some mutations are good, some bad, most neither.

Cancer is an example of a product of a bad one.



How am I being obtuse?
Posted by Caplewood
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2010
39156 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:41 pm to
Your angle of argument is greater than 90 degrees
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73140 posts
Posted on 4/21/14 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

My thoughts are that we have a cure for cancer. Those with power have access, those who don’t, don’t.

What say you?
the short answer

at best you are completely wrong and uninformed

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram