- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latinos now outnumber non-Hispanic whites in Texas, census data shows
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:24 pm to deltaland
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:24 pm to deltaland
quote:
Latinos I expect to assimilate over time and become more conservative.
Assimilate for what? They're going to be the majority one day. Your family will assimilate. Work on that Spanish.
0
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:26 pm to The Torch
quote:
On another note: The Hispanic / Latino is probably the least trouble of all the races, they work and do shite jobs no one else will do.
When it's 110 outside they are working on roofs, laying concrete, and mowing yard after yard.
While a other (unmentioned) race is milking welfare to death and robbing everyone they can.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:26 pm to justaniceguy
quote:
That’s because back then Democrats we’re not liberals.
Yeah they were. Southern whites voted for the Democrats due to the New Deal Coalition. Also the word you are looking for is 'were' not 'we're.'
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:31 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Yeah they were
Democrats back then were “pro” poor people, that’s not the case today. Today it’s about keeping you poor, pro war, anti free speech, pro big money corporations, pro government intrusion, etc
RINOS are no different, they may not want to keep people poor for their votes, but they go along with everything else from liberals
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:32 pm to RLDSC FAN
And many of these Hispanics have been in Texas for generations, so cry me a river.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:33 pm to crazy4lsu
Both parties had liberal and conservative factions in those days. Grover Cleveland was a libertarian democrat in the 1800s and Calvin Coolidge was a libertarian republican in the 1920s.
Thomas Jefferson started the party that became the democrat party and he would be a libertarian today. He certainly wouldn’t support Biden.
Thomas Jefferson started the party that became the democrat party and he would be a libertarian today. He certainly wouldn’t support Biden.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:34 pm to Locoguan0
Also hispanic is not a race.
I put hispanic down because I am a quarter hispanic but I literally look like a dude from a nazi poster.
I put hispanic down because I am a quarter hispanic but I literally look like a dude from a nazi poster.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:34 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
Democrats back then were “pro” poor people, that’s not the case today.
Why do you morons just say shite? Reality is more interesting than the nonsense you tards repeat.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:34 pm to RLDSC FAN
The Democrats did it. They gave the damn country away.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:36 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Why do you morons just say shite? Reality is more interesting than the nonsense you tards repeat.
Quit rereading your posts and read mine. Southerners were poor back then, overall the democrats were thought of as the party for the poor people. Of course it’s more complex than that, but that is the truth.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:37 pm to Mushroom1968
The south was democrat since long before the 1920s though.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:42 pm to justaniceguy
quote:
The south was democrat since long before the 1920s though.
I agree, not arguing they weren’t. I’m just saying the D party back then is completely different than today, completely different than it was even 15 years ago. It’s not the party for the poor people like it use to be. It is detrimental to the poor people
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:48 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
Quit rereading your posts and read mine.
Lol, you are just saying shite. You don't know what you are talking about. We both know that.
quote:
outherners were poor back then, overall the democrats were thought of as the party for the poor people
This isn't accurate. Democrats dominated the South in the decade before the Civil War, and John C. Breckinridge represented the Southern Democratic Party. After the war, the 'redeemers,' who were Democrats, again dominated the South while Anti-Slavery Republicans became limited to the North. Again, the actual history is more interesting than anything you wrote.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 4:54 pm to GeauxTigers123
quote:
They are both likely to vote liberal
Not the Cubans. Those guys freaking hate the commie/socialists they've had to deal with in Cuba. (IDK about other backgrounds)
Posted on 10/27/23 at 5:01 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
This isn't accurate. Democrats dominated the South in the decade before the Civil War, and John C. Breckinridge represented the Southern Democratic Party. After the war, the 'redeemers,' who were Democrats, again dominated the South while Anti-Slavery Republicans became limited to the North
None of this has shite to do with my post, and I was referring to 20th century not civil war.
quote:
Again, the actual history is more interesting than anything you wrote
Yea no shite, I’m not typing out a History degree paper on here
quote:
Lol, you are just saying shite. You don't know what you are talking about. We both know that.
I think you read way too deeply in my post.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 5:01 pm to Hondo Blacksheep
quote:
The Dems are losing Hispanics because they don't understand them.
I've always found it funny how the libtards just lump all the Hispanics in one big group. They really don't have a frickin clue. But neither do the Republicans so it's just shite eating.
This post was edited on 10/27/23 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 10/27/23 at 5:04 pm to Play_Neck
Most Hispanics are socially conservative. At least until america corrupts them.
Pretty sure the stereotype is that Cubans and Venezuelans are Republicans (the Venezuelans that immigrated legally that is, not the ones coming over the border in the last few years)
Pretty sure the stereotype is that Cubans and Venezuelans are Republicans (the Venezuelans that immigrated legally that is, not the ones coming over the border in the last few years)
Posted on 10/27/23 at 5:05 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
None of this has shite to do with my post, and I was referring to 20th century not civil war.
Uh, you insane dipshit, what occurred after the CW is essential to why the Democrats dominated the South. How are you this dense? Even the era between 1896 to 1932, called the Fourth Party System, was characterized by Republicans and Democrats trying to win over immigrants who resided in larger cities.
quote:
Yea no shite, I’m not typing out a History degree paper on here
Yeah, that's definitely above your paygrade. Sad!
quote:
I think you read way too deeply in my post.
Again, you don't know what you are talking about and are just typing stuff. Shut up.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 5:10 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Uh, you insane dipshit, what occurred after the CW is essential to why the Democrats dominated the South. How are you this dense? Even the era between 1896 to 1932, called the Fourth Party System, was characterized by Republicans and Democrats trying to win over immigrants who resided in larger cities.
First, I don't understand the personal insults. Second, we aren't even arguing about the same thing. I'm not even sure why you have typed all this out in this post and your others. I think you badly misunderstood my point earlier. Nothing you have said to me has anything to do with any point I've tried to make.
quote:
Yeah, that's definitely above your paygrade. Sad!
True
quote:
Again, you don't know what you are talking about and are just typing stuff. Shut up.
Yes I actually do, you just don't know how to read someone's post. I'll keep typing though, thanks.
Posted on 10/27/23 at 5:14 pm to Mushroom1968
quote:
First, I don't understand the personal insults. Second, we aren't even arguing about the same thing. I'm not even sure why you have typed all this out in this post and your others. I think you badly misunderstood my point earlier. Nothing you have said to me has anything to do with any point I've tried to make.
Your point that Democrats were the party of the 'poor people' isn't accurate, or rather, isn't a reflection of the incredibly interesting competition for new voting blocs in the US as they appeared. That's the long and short of it.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News