- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jokes about Charlie Kirk and wishing someone would get k!lled at Kevin harts roast
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:35 am to BilJ
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:35 am to BilJ
quote:
Being a faux outraged pussy back only continues the cycle
I don't think the people that act like this actually want things to get better moreso than to absorb a feeling that "they won".
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:19 am to CatsGoneWild
I couldn't watch more than 20 minutes, nothing to do with Charlie Kirk, I just didn't find it all that funny compared to most of the roasts I've watched.
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 9:21 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 9:56 am to Swagga
“The Black community is so proud of you… right now George Floyd is looking up at us all, laughing so hard he can’t breathe,” he said.
LMFAO
Looks like the Fatigues are pissed off over a joke too.
‘Sad for the culture’: The family of George Floyd joins those reacting to ‘The Roast of Kevin Hart’ joke about his death
LMFAO
Looks like the Fatigues are pissed off over a joke too.
‘Sad for the culture’: The family of George Floyd joins those reacting to ‘The Roast of Kevin Hart’ joke about his death
This post was edited on 5/13/26 at 10:03 am
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:04 am to CatsGoneWild
I have zero problem with tasteless jokes at a roast. This is what humor used to be. I loved the joke from Tony that he has no clue how that chick's husband lasted 3 years with her before killing himself. Zero comedic censorship was nice to see.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:05 am to BilJ
quote:
It’s terrible…they claim to hate cancel culture but are constantly wanting to cry and cancel others.
We'd be better off if we just abandoned the noise over cancel culture and hypocrisy and admitted the truth.
It's fine to want to cancel your enemies and not cancel your friends. Just frame it that way instead of framing it on some deeply held belief in the marketplace of ideas.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:08 am to Pettifogger
quote:
It's fine to want to cancel your enemies and not cancel your friends.
I don't know if "fine" is the word I'd use, natural perhaps.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 10:11 am to Mizz-SEC
quote:
I don't give jack shite about a roast joke. I'm talking about the celebration (among some) that went on when Charlie Kirk was murdered. He got killed for words. Disgusting.
Well, I'm pretty sure this thread is about the roast so...
Posted on 5/13/26 at 12:36 pm to Mizz-SEC
quote:Not only are you not a mind reader, but apparently the written word escapes you as well.
So you're a mind reader too. Assuming you know me. lo-fricking-l.
And you're proving just how thick you are. Ate up with politics. I don't give a shite about jokes at a roast. Here, I'll repeat it for you... I don't give jack shite about a roast joke. I'm talking about the celebration (among some) that went on when Charlie Kirk was murdered. He got killed for words. Disgusting.
Were the deaths of Versace, Harvey Milk and Tupac celebrated? They certainly weren't by me. In fact, I took no joy in the deaths of the leaders of Iran. That it happened can get chalked up to FAFO. They brought it on themselves, but I found no reason to dance over the fact.
The same with those two nitwits in Minneapolis who FAFO out with ICE agents. Was I happy they died? No. Have I ever "celebrated" a death? No. Did I celebrate the people that little douchebag Rittenhouse in Milwaukee shot? No. They all tried to play games in the wrong place and FAFO.
Okay... Now I get to cosplay the mind reader. So you celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk, is that right? Figures.
Because you’re arguing against a position I never took.
I never said “celebrating murder is good.” I said people’s moral outrage about jokes and reactions becomes wildly inconsistent depending on whether they emotionally identify with the victim. That’s why you've now immediately expanded into qualifiers, context, FAFO logic, “they brought it on themselves,” distinctions between celebration vs satisfaction, etc.
You literally demonstrated the point in your own post.
“The leaders of Iran? FAFO.”
“The ICE situation? FAFO.”
Notice how quickly the conversation stops being “all joy over death is disgusting” and turns into contextual analysis once the dead person is someone you dislike or blame for their circumstances.
That’s my point. Thanks for proving it.
Also, no, I never said I celebrated Charlie Kirk’s murder. You added that because internet politics has mushed your brain into “if you criticize my framing you must secretly support the other side.” Disagreeing with your inconsistency is not the same thing as endorsing murder.
"A difficult distinction for you to make, I'm sure."
Posted on 5/13/26 at 4:46 pm to northshorebamaman
Not to mention the vast vast majority of the “celebrating” regarding Kirk’s death weren’t that. It was people pointing out the irony in his statements and his manner of death etc.
Popular
Back to top

0










