- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I’ve been saying it’s so easy to ignore the lgbtq stuff but man it’s getting tough.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:08 am to bayoudude
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:08 am to bayoudude
quote:
Gays and trannies are an abomination to God
Your religious beliefs have no business determining who deserves equal protection under the law.
You know what is an abomination? Adulterers. If you had sex before you were married, you’re an adulterer. Liars, thieves, divorce, eating pork…are all sins.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:13 am to IkeandTina
quote:
You know what is an abomination? Adulterers. If you had sex before you were married, you’re an adulterer. Liars, thieves, divorce, eating pork…are all sins.
maybe so. but back to the OP, LBTQXYZLMNOP+ content should not be pushed upon our children. Or do you not have children?
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:13 am to IkeandTina
quote:
eating pork
I'll take bacon over religion all day
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:14 am to IkeandTina
Only adolescents are concerned about hypocrisy; normal well-adjusted adults are more concerned with the survival and well being of their families and friends.
But there's nothing hypocritical about saying it's wet when it rains.
And if you really thought gay was normal or healthy, you wouldn't use the word as an insult or accusation. Who's being hypocritical now, genius?
But there's nothing hypocritical about saying it's wet when it rains.
And if you really thought gay was normal or healthy, you wouldn't use the word as an insult or accusation. Who's being hypocritical now, genius?
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 6:15 am
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:16 am to USMCguy121
quote:
Is your brain shaped like a trapezoid?
Don't know about the shape, but I'm certain his brain is as smooth as glass.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:18 am to dallastigers
you want the government deciding what rights adults have-including the right to marry. SAD. Most of your post was histrionics and more of your straw man arguments but as far as rights decided by govt. Are you talking about: A right to have beginning, middle, and end of a relationship and children/heirs created in said relationship regulated by multiple govts and outside of more recent history taxed more?
I’ve said adults who enter into consenting relationships with adults or enter a legal contract, ie marriage, deserve equal protection under the law. Why is that so difficult for your small brain to understand?
Or A “right” that the federal Govt Supreme Court created in 2015 based on a section of an amendment ratified by legislatures of state govts in 1868 that originally applied as a check on state govts. It is sad that somehow homosexuals didn’t know how to love until the federal govt supremes told state govts to let them marry and regulate it, but are you ok with govt deciding that this is a right to regulate (or equal protection as a state can do away with acknowledging or regulating marriage completely)?
I’m talking about a right that I have to apply for a license from the government to have. I’m talking about a right that gives me TAX benefits. I’m talking about a right that before the Loving case, was denied in some states to those who want to enter interracial marriages. The government has no business picking and choosing which tax paying adults are worthy of benefits afforded to citizens. None. Be fair and get the hell out of marriage or grant everyone civil unions or marriages.
Anyway what about rights of adults who want to attend or run churches based on their beliefs on marriage and rights of same people to run their private business based on their faith? When does the right of one adult end and the other begin?
Churches shouldn’t have tax exempt statuses to begin with. Why should they get tax breaks to buy Pastor John his new jet? I have no issue with churches refusing to marry anyone and a photographer refusing a service, but they should be prepared for their business to fail.
I’ve said adults who enter into consenting relationships with adults or enter a legal contract, ie marriage, deserve equal protection under the law. Why is that so difficult for your small brain to understand?
Or A “right” that the federal Govt Supreme Court created in 2015 based on a section of an amendment ratified by legislatures of state govts in 1868 that originally applied as a check on state govts. It is sad that somehow homosexuals didn’t know how to love until the federal govt supremes told state govts to let them marry and regulate it, but are you ok with govt deciding that this is a right to regulate (or equal protection as a state can do away with acknowledging or regulating marriage completely)?
I’m talking about a right that I have to apply for a license from the government to have. I’m talking about a right that gives me TAX benefits. I’m talking about a right that before the Loving case, was denied in some states to those who want to enter interracial marriages. The government has no business picking and choosing which tax paying adults are worthy of benefits afforded to citizens. None. Be fair and get the hell out of marriage or grant everyone civil unions or marriages.
Anyway what about rights of adults who want to attend or run churches based on their beliefs on marriage and rights of same people to run their private business based on their faith? When does the right of one adult end and the other begin?
Churches shouldn’t have tax exempt statuses to begin with. Why should they get tax breaks to buy Pastor John his new jet? I have no issue with churches refusing to marry anyone and a photographer refusing a service, but they should be prepared for their business to fail.
This post was edited on 11/30/22 at 6:43 am
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:20 am to PowerTool
I’m thinking IkeandTina is a tranny youth, who was probably groomed itself. No well functioning adult can be this childish and stupid with their arguments. The bitch can’t even say sexualizing children is wrong without throwing out a bunch stupid whataboutisms.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:26 am to IkeandTina
quote:
You know what is an abomination? Adulterers. If you had sex before you were married, you’re an adulterer. Liars, thieves, divorce, eating pork…are all sins.
this is true and we all fall short of grace. We should not stay there. Making sin mainstream is not a road we need to travel on.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:27 am to Klark Kent
quote:
You know what is an abomination? Adulterers. If you had sex before you were married, you’re an adulterer. Liars, thieves, divorce, eating pork…are all sins. maybe so. but back to the OP, LBTQXYZLMNOP+ content should not be pushed upon our children. Or do you not have children?
He just said that a group of people are an abomination to God. How is that relevant? Do you take issue with people shoving their religious beliefs down others’ throats who may have different beliefs? Eating pork is a sin, but I haven’t asked for bacon to be banned by the government. Divorce is a sin, but I haven’t asked for divorce to be banned by the government.
I don’t believe there’s a grand conspiracy to “push” anything on my children. This started bc there’s a gay character in strange world. Every day, I have to monitor what my children are watching bc commercials, tv, and movies are filled with heterosexuals kissing, talking about their relationships, etc. it’s exactly the same, but you take issue with Strange World bc the character has a crush on a boy. Don’t like the movie? Don’t go see it. It’s poss poor parenting if you took your kids to a movie and didn’t research the movie. I had to explain to my kids why T’Challa and Nakia had a child out of wedlock in Black Panther but nobody cares about heterosexuals in movies. Why is that content pushed on my children? Why don’t you take issue with “Sleeping Beauty?”
There are bigots in this thread arguing that lgbt people molest children but say NOTHING about conservatives who do so.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:29 am to Bourre
quote:
The bitch can’t even say sexualizing children is wrong without throwing out a bunch stupid whataboutisms
If you eat pork you're on the same level as kiddie diddlers
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:30 am to Bourre
thinking IkeandTina is a tranny youth, who was probably groomed itself. No well functioning adult can be this childish and stupid with their arguments. The bitch can’t even say sexualizing children is wrong without throwing out a bunch stupid whataboutisms.
It’s not my fault that your reading comprehension skills are so lacking. You and your ilk have said that it’s lgbt people who molest kids without even acknowledging and disavowing the heterosexuals who behave in that disgusting manner. SAD.
It’s not my fault that your reading comprehension skills are so lacking. You and your ilk have said that it’s lgbt people who molest kids without even acknowledging and disavowing the heterosexuals who behave in that disgusting manner. SAD.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:32 am to IkeandTina
quote:
This started bc there’s a gay character in strange world
No. This started because a transvestite shook his dick in a young boys face during a Disney Christmas Special.
OP didn’t even bring up the gay childrens movie.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:33 am to terd ferguson
quote:
whataboutisms If you eat pork you're on the same level as kiddie diddlers
No one said that, but if you’re going to preach and say that being gay or trans (not synonymous with molester)is an “abomination,” and try to shove your religious beliefs down my throat, I’m going to remind you of all the sins you engage in but somehow excuse.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:35 am to Rebel
quote:
This started bc there’s a gay character in strange world No. This started because a transvestite shook his dick in a young boys face during a Disney Christmas Special. OP didn’t even bring up the gay childrens movie.
On the first page, people were bitching about the movie “Strange World” for the sole reason that there’s a boy with a crush on another boy in the movie.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:35 am to IkeandTina
I'm not religious... I just think transvestites are fricking mentally ill degenerates
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:39 am to terd ferguson
I'm not religious... I just think transvestites are fricking mentally ill degenerates
You’re entitled to your beliefs. They may feel the same about you.
You’re entitled to your beliefs. They may feel the same about you.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:41 am to IkeandTina
Tbh, you people should be chemically castrated and get the medical help you so desperately need.
If Milo Yionopolis can stop sucking black dicks, so can you. All he did was pray the gay away. In fact, he is helping people with conversation therapy.
If Milo Yionopolis can stop sucking black dicks, so can you. All he did was pray the gay away. In fact, he is helping people with conversation therapy.
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:43 am to IkeandTina
I just hope they can take a break from grooming kids long enough to kill themselves
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:44 am to IkeandTina
Yep, IkeandTina is a mentally damaged emotional tranny bitch. You’ve done nothing but lie and deflect in this thread. You have not once said children should not be sexualized by ANYONE, you just keep deflecting with whataboutisms.
It’s not hard, try it. Children SHOULD NOT be sexualized by ANYONE
It’s not hard, try it. Children SHOULD NOT be sexualized by ANYONE
Posted on 11/30/22 at 6:44 am to IkeandTina
The Strange World movie is an add-on to the OP talking about the Disney Christmas Special.
What Strange World shows is Disney does have an agenda. It’s why they have lost 1/3 of market cap and fired their CEO.
What Strange World shows is Disney does have an agenda. It’s why they have lost 1/3 of market cap and fired their CEO.
Popular
Back to top
