- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Inflation the last 50 years
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:26 pm to Obtuse1
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:26 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
Where does the idea that a better standard of living shouldn't cost more coming from?
Seriously?
In a vacuum it should, but not when comparing eras.
Just do a simple thought exercise comparing your standard of living today versus very wealthy people of the past.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:26 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
quote:
Where does the idea that a better standard of living shouldn't cost more coming from?
Introductory economics. You’re smarter than this
In regard to the sectors the OP listed, you simply can't expect to get MOAR for the same adjusted cost. Again look at housing. The median houses are not the same. The component parts of a house are almost all derived from mature industries with low idiot factors, you aren't going to see much if any drop in adjusted costs so larger houses with better finishes etc you should expect to pay more for. If you want a bigger house it will cost more, there is nothing in economics that says this is wrong.
Now if you talk about certain immature sectors with high idiot factors you should absolutely expect to get more for your adjusted dollars at a later time. I excellent example of this is televisions. HDTVs hit the US in numbers around 2000-2002. In 2002 I bought a 65" CRT RPTV 1080P set for just under $5,000, it was SOTA at the time in the size range. You can get a 85-100" set today that is exponentially better in ever metric for the same adjusted money today. You can get 65" 4K TV that is exponentially better for about 1/10th the adjusted price. That industry has had 25 years to mature and has dropped its idiot factor from (I am guessing) 10 down to say 3.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:28 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
If you want a bigger house it will cost more, there is nothing in economics that says this is wrong.
Price per square foot has outpaced inflation, bigly
This is a bad look for you
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:52 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Price per square foot has outpaced inflation, bigly
Yes, and what you get in those square feet are much different than 1974. You could build a house now with 8 foot ceilings, carpet and roll vinyl floors, fewer/smaller windows, less insulation, fewer and lower amperage 120v branch circuits, fiberglass tub/shower combos, small and limited moulding, formica countertops, and the list goes on and on. The issue is people don't WANT them now, they want more and for some reason expect it to come at the same adjusted price.
Posted on 10/7/25 at 10:53 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
they want more and for some reason expect it to come at the same adjusted price.
Yes, basic economic theory
Posted on 10/8/25 at 1:46 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Only on the OT do people think the standard of living shouldn’t increase over time.
It has increased. Only people that get embarrassed on a college football message board by others for their lack of knowledge in their own career field can’t see that prices go up as well. Why should the average adjusted price of a house go down or stay the same when you’re building a 70% bigger house?
I’m sorry man, but you’ve got a serious lack of critical thinking skills.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:22 am to Obtuse1
quote:
You could build a house now with 8 foot ceilings, carpet and roll vinyl floors, fewer/smaller windows, less insulation, fewer and lower amperage 120v branch circuits, fiberglass tub/shower combos, small and limited moulding, formica countertops, and the list goes on and on
Do you not see the fallacy in this?
"You could build a model T and it would cost $500, therefore inflation is bogus."
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:25 am to Sofaking2
Auto expenses are the fault of the people. There is no shortage of dipshits lining up to drop 3x what they can truly afford on a vehicle after doing it a few years earlier. A well made expensive car can last 10-15 years, but here, they are traded before they’re even paid off.
Posted on 10/8/25 at 8:28 am to nugget
quote:
Why should the average adjusted price of a house go down or stay the same when you’re building a 70% bigger house?
SMH
quote:
I’m sorry man, but you’ve got a serious lack of critical thinking skills.
STILL butthurt over some bullshite golf conversation. Really pathetic
Popular
Back to top

0





