- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I wonder if this was the third shooter for the San Bernadino attack
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:33 pm to beauchristopher
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:33 pm to beauchristopher
quote:
I am sure owners of those guns will be all defensive of it.
Define "those guns".
0
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:33 pm to SmackoverHawg
I hope he enjoys his electric chair,the selling of any firearm in CA must go through a federal firearms license selling face to face is obviously illegal. Whether he was a shooter or not he is directly responsible.
Posted on 12/7/15 at 6:48 pm to beauchristopher
The reason the general public should have access to these weapons is simple, self defense. The military and police have these weapons, so should the public.
What is the original intent of the 2nd amendment? Bare arms for hunting? No. Bare arms for protection from an oppressive government so that the public can rise up if need be.
I know you said you didn't want to get into a political duscussion, but that's the easiest explanation as to why we should have the option to have access to these guns.
What is the original intent of the 2nd amendment? Bare arms for hunting? No. Bare arms for protection from an oppressive government so that the public can rise up if need be.
I know you said you didn't want to get into a political duscussion, but that's the easiest explanation as to why we should have the option to have access to these guns.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News