Started By
Message

re: I just turned down "the vaccine". Update pg 13.

Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:28 pm to
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
13114 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:28 pm to
quote:

Just curious, do you ask the same of every medication you’ve ever taken?


I rarely take medications, and the ones I do take are OTC and have been around for decades. Not sure why this matters.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
90105 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

Exercise completed. Now why should I care about the “10 reasons why”? Give me a concrete example.



Vaccines are an exercise in the group above one’s self. Anti-Vaxxers are essentially safe because everyone else vaccinates. The irony is comical.
Posted by tigerbru17
Billy in 4C
Member since Jan 2009
9956 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:30 pm to
This thread was started by someone who treats patients everyday. This thread was then derailed by someone who works in big pharma. I wonder who used demeaning intimidation to state their case to help others and who didn’t.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
90105 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:30 pm to
quote:

rarely take medications, and the ones I do take are OTC and have been around for decades. Not sure why this matters.



So you’re going to avoid a vaccine because of the unknown side effects. You’d rather take your chances with a virus that has existed for 12 months with unknown side effects.

Got it.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 10:31 pm
Posted by omarlittle
Member since Mar 2011
1323 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:31 pm to
I’m not concerned with my own safety (in this case). Does the vaccine protect those that take it from getting infected?
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160200 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:31 pm to
People who've had Guillain-Barre Syndrome, people with severe allergies, possibly people who have cancer or are otherwise immunocompromised, although those are on a case by case basis. As of now, they haven't studied the vaccine on pregnant or breastfeeding women so many of those people may wait for studies, but that's another case by case basis.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34203 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Yikes. I’m implying that we have no idea how people acted in the trial. They may have gone about their everyday lives as normal or became a hermit. Pfizer did not mention this in their limitations.


Ok, i'm going to try this one more time, because you're dense and clearly it requires it.

- The trial was double blind...meaning neither research nor participant knew if they were getting the vaccine or a placebo (that means not the vaccine)

- They were randomized into groups and no one knew what they received...20,000 in each group

What you are suggesting is that somehow someway a majority of the people in the trial knew that they had received the vaccine or the placebo, and with that knowledge conducted their lives differently because of it.

It's a statistical impossibility. It cannot happen in a trial of that size and so it didn't need to be something that was tracked in any detail.

They also didn't track what cereal people ate for breakfast...that doesn't mean the vaccine doesn't work.

If you still don't get it, I can't help you. No one can.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
90105 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

This thread was started by someone who treats patients everyday. This thread was then derailed by someone who works in big pharma. I wonder who used demeaning intimidation to state their case to help others and who didn’t.


Nurses are dumb as frick. Don’t kid yourself.
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
13114 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

So you’re going to avoid a vaccine because of the unknown side effects. You’d rather take your chances with a virus that has existed for 12 months with unknown side effects.



So, unknown side effects vs unknown side effects. Not really the best argument, but...

quote:

Got it.


Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
90105 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

I’m not concerned with my own safety (in this case). Does the vaccine protect those that take it from getting infected?


Yes. Not 100%, but yes.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Except about 70,000 people in phase 3 trials where the data was scrutinized to no end, like every other drug that comes before the FDA.


So there has never been a vaccine pulled from use a year or more after entering widespread use due to adverse effects not seen in the clinical trials? Hint, I already know the answer.
Posted by omarlittle
Member since Mar 2011
1323 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:35 pm to


quote:

Yes. Not 100%, but yes
So again, I ask: why is it so important that I get vaccinated.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 10:36 pm
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34203 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

This thread was then derailed by someone who works in big pharma


If calling out stupid, flat out wrong takes is derailing, I guess I'm guilty. Sorry for blowing up your echo chamber.
Posted by tigerbru17
Billy in 4C
Member since Jan 2009
9956 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:35 pm to
They don’t know the effectiveness of spread post vaccination. There was a study that showed it can be passed through the nasal passages after vaccination. This is why mucosal vaccines, like the nasal spray FluMist or the oral polio vaccine, are better than intramuscular injections at fending off respiratory viruses.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
90105 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

So, unknown side effects vs unknown side effects. Not really the best argument, but...


Like I said, illogical. You’ve decided one is worse than the other without any evidence to support such a claim. The only evidence you have is that the vaccine dramatically reduces your chances of getting the virus, yet you’ve chose to ignore it.
Posted by Capt ST
High Plains
Member since Aug 2011
13347 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:36 pm to
Yeah, I think you’re correct. My mother must be referring to the IPV developed in 1953 and administered in 1954. She contracted it right before they came out with it. Regardless, we have to agree there’s been great strides made in the medical field in the last 20 years.
Posted by Jyrdis
TD Premium Member Level III
Member since Aug 2015
13114 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

Ok, i'm going to try this one more time, because you're dense and clearly it requires it.


Thanks for the ad hominem.

quote:

The trial was double blind...meaning neither research nor participant knew if they were getting the vaccine or a placebo (that means not the vaccine)


Yes, I knew that. But you’re too much of an idiot to accept that.

quote:

They were randomized into groups and no one knew what they received...20,000 in each group


No shite. I read the study.
quote:

What you are suggesting is that somehow someway a majority of the people in the trial knew that they had received the vaccine or the placebo, and with that knowledge conducted their lives differently because of it.


Close.
quote:

It's a statistical impossibility. It cannot happen in a trial of that size and so it didn't need to be something that was tracked in any detail.


Not really. Given the amount of endogenous and exogenous events thy occurred. It’s in no way out of the realm of possibility to consider behavioral changes, but then again Pfizer doesn’t let us know this.

quote:

They also didn't track what cereal people ate for breakfast...that doesn't mean the vaccine doesn't work.


Yet, a sea crew contracted Covid after being quarantining and then going out to see. Gee, what cereal were they eating?

quote:

If you still don't get it, I can't help you. No one can.


It’s ok. Maybe one day you can go beyond linear thinking.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
90105 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

So again, I ask: why is it so important that I get vaccinated.


Because it’s higher than 0%.

Christ, most of you haven’t spent more than 2 seconds thinking these asinine takes through to their logical conclusion.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34203 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:41 pm to
quote:

But you’re too much of an idiot to accept that.


Are you on a GFM fueled bender?

You're suggesting that I am not accepting that the trial was double blind? The frick?

quote:

Given the amount of endogenous and exogenous events thy occurred.


Please do tell me more on this. I'd love to hear it.
This post was edited on 12/17/20 at 10:42 pm
Posted by lsuson
Metairie
Member since Oct 2013
13989 posts
Posted on 12/17/20 at 10:43 pm to
I’ve researched it. Talked to several docs. One who has a very sick husband who can not get covid. She got the vaccine. Zero hesitations. I’m getting the vaccine
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 30
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 30Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram