- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:22 pm to LSUAlum2001
quote:
those removable cells, but only 300km if you just have the removable cells.
I wonder how much they are and if there is a core charge. Would be pretty convenient to have a milk crate full of spares in the back.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:23 pm to junkfunky
quote:
Would be pretty convenient to have a milk crate full of spares in the back.
Not if you get rear ended.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 2:25 pm to SidetrackSilvera

This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 5/29/24 at 4:19 pm to High C
quote:
I will never cease to be amazed.
Neither will I.
Posted on 5/29/24 at 4:22 pm to NATidefan
quote:
How we gonna make the hydrogen?
Electrolysis?
So burn coal, to make electricity, to then to make hydrogen?
This would all work so much better with nuclear power.
I agree. The issue with alternative forms of propulsion is not the tech itself, it's the energy source and that infrastructure. Chicken before the egg that is driving the current issue with EV's.
But I assume if they had hydrogen trucks alongside gasoline trucks delivering to stations it wouldn't be a big of a challenge as upgrading power grids. But energy density of hydrogen is pathetic compared to gasoline.
quote:
Liquid hydrogen has a volumetric energy density of 8 MJ/l, which is lower than gasoline's 32 MJ/l.
This post was edited on 5/29/24 at 4:25 pm
Popular
Back to top
