Started By
Message

re: How fast can you cholesterol drop in 5 weeks?

Posted on 4/27/16 at 1:11 pm to
Posted by tigerz3030
Valdosta, GA
Member since Aug 2007
331 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 1:11 pm to
Check on a drug called Praluent. It's indicated for Familial Hypercholesteremia
Posted by LSUfan20005
Member since Sep 2012
9256 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 1:17 pm to
Unless you get LDL particles tested, your results don't mean anything.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 5:05 pm to
LINK

A good discussion from Dr Peter Attia on the complexities/history/politics of cholesterol and saturated fats

Quote from a low fat/low cholesterol researcher/"advocate" who helped reinforce the old dietary recommendations...

quote:

It's an imperfect world. The data that would be definitive is ungettable, so you do your best with what is available
This post was edited on 4/27/16 at 5:34 pm
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
19318 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 5:11 pm to
What about stroke??
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
73753 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 5:12 pm to
Cut out carbs in your diet and you'll see a drop in LDL and a gain in HDL.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
19318 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 5:13 pm to
Yes there are drugs available now
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40256 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 6:50 pm to
Right by my arteries (carotid) are what. 60yo would have. I'm almost 47. Statins she said would help immensely.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
40256 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 6:52 pm to
And i don't have the report with me (I'm out of town) but the testing said I had small, sticky cholesterol and it's mainly from my body producing it as opposed to diet. In other words, heredity. And I have no clue how the lab tests can tell some of what it tells.

Done through Boston Heart Diagnostics.
This post was edited on 4/27/16 at 6:53 pm
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
25332 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 6:58 pm to
I've seen serum that is milk white from triglycerides, and the cholesterol wasn't good. My first attack happened at chol 220- ldl -105. Exercise and strict diet got it down to 212 ldl - 100. almost within error of the instruments. the new meds got everything down a lot
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 7:34 pm to
Particle size matters. This is measured using an NMR study. Most cholesterol studies only measure total LDL which does not tell the complete story (see example below)

HDL and triglycerides are also very important in deciphering the story

Example:

I would be much more worried about the guy with a normal LDL on standard panel (who may have a predominance of small particles), and low HDL , high triglycerides

Vs

The guy with higher LDL of larger, fluffy size with high HDL and low triglycerides (this can be typical of people on low carb, high fat diets. See last image, pink bars listed as Westman low CHO and note the slight rise in LDL, but improvement across the board in all other metabolic parameters)

Context is needed when looking at these markers. I worry for people who look at 1 item and focus on it. This can be a very short sighted approach. Make sure you have your eye on the correct ball(s)...





This post was edited on 4/27/16 at 7:59 pm
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15388 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

I sell one of the new LDL lowering meds which are so much better than statins.


Which class? So much better than statins at what? Primary/secondary prevention of ASCVD-related events? Deaths? LDL-lowering potential?

There are currently no medicines available to my knowledge that are "so much better" than statins, specifically high-dose ones, regarding deaths due to ASCVD unless the PCSK-9 data has come out (finally) and is much more groundbreaking than expected. Even then, I think they are statistically significantly better, but only marginally so in the selected population.


There's plenty better than statins at LDL and triglyceride reduction, though.
Posted by Upperaltiger06
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
4255 posts
Posted on 4/27/16 at 7:58 pm to
I think you mean lipoprotein is comprised of fat and protein.
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10807 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Particle size matters. This is measured using an NMR study. Most cholesterol studies only measure total LDL which does not tell the complete story (see example below)


How does one go about getting this type of analysis done?
Posted by WaveHog
Austin, TX
Member since May 2008
6968 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Check on a drug called Praluent. It's indicated for Familial Hypercholesteremia


thanks. hopefully it doesn't come to that. one year check-up with the cardiologist is coming soon. i had a 0% on my coronary calcium scan last time around. i have about a 53 bpm resting heart rate. so long as my pipes are clean and healthy, i am going to refuse statins, though i'm sure he's going to insist.
Posted by WaveHog
Austin, TX
Member since May 2008
6968 posts
Posted on 4/28/16 at 11:21 am to
quote:

How does one go about getting this type of analysis done?


independent labs. you can google "nmr lipoprofile [city name]" without the quotation marks and some labs should pop up. call them and see if they offer it.

i've been meaning to do it myself.
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10807 posts
Posted on 5/13/16 at 9:52 am to
30 days ago mine was, 224;LDL 172;Triglycerides 240
Today I am at 97, 51 and 79

Had a heart attack and went total plant based with no oils.

My concern now is getting my HDL up as it is only at 23
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram