Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Homo Luzonensis

Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:39 pm
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51408 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:39 pm
Humankind's tangled shrub of ancestry now has a new branch: Researchers in the Philippines announced today that they have discovered a species of ancient human previously unknown to science.

The small-bodied hominin, named Homo luzonensis, lived on the island of Luzon at least 50,000 to 67,000 years ago. The hominin—identified from a total of seven teeth and six small bones—hosts a patchwork of ancient and more advanced features. The landmark discovery, announced in Nature on Wednesday, makes Luzon the third Southeast Asian island in the last 15 years to bear signs of unexpectedly ancient human activity.

“For a long, long time, the Philippine islands [have] been more or less left [out]," says study coauthor and project leader Armand Mijares, an archaeologist at the University of the Philippines Diliman and a National Geographic grantee. But H. luzonensis flips the script, and it continues to challenge the outdated idea that the human line neatly progressed from less advanced to more advanced species.


Human Origins 101
“This new discovery made me thrilled,” Yousuke Kaifu, a paleoanthropologist at Tokyo's National Museum of Nature and Science who was not part of the new study, says via email. “It further highlights remarkable diversity of archaic (primitive) hominins once present in Asia, in a way beyond my expectation.”

Aida Gómez-Robles, a paleoanthropologist at University College London who reviewed the study before publication, is hesitant to unequivocally say the find represents a new species. But she adds that all possibilities to explain the unusual fossils are equally intriguing.

“It’s absolutely one of the most important findings that [will] be out in a number of years,” she says.


Digging deeper into Asia's past
Decades ago, the story of Asia seemed far more straightforward, if incomplete. Paleoanthropologists knew that archaic hominins such as Homo erectus ventured over land bridges into parts of what is now Indonesia nearly a million years ago. But farther east, it was thought that these hominins ran into ocean currents considered impassable without boats.

Luzon seemed especially difficult for ancient hominins to reach, as it had never been connected to the mainland by land bridges, so archaeologists thought that digging into deeper, older layers of soil wouldn't yield much. When Mijares first excavated Callao Cave in 2003, he found 25,000-year-old evidence of human activity—but he didn't dig any deeper than about four feet down.


“Most Southeast Asian archaeologists would only excavate cave sites up to two meters, and they would stop,” Mijares says.

That all changed in 2004, when researchers unveiled Homo floresiensis—a diminutive hominin, also known as the “hobbit,” that inhabited the Indonesian island of Flores until 50,000 years ago. Inspired, Mijares returned to Callao Cave in 2007 to literally dig deeper.


The team excavated more than five feet of clay below where they had stopped digging in 2003, with no fossils in sight. But then they found a layer of breccia, a type of rock formed from a jumble of other materials. Tantalizingly, this layer contained fragments of bone that had washed into the cave long ago. At first, the bones seemed to include only animals such as deer and pigs. But under closer inspection, one piece stood out: a nearly complete foot bone that looked human. The team sent the fossil to Philip Piper, a coauthor of the new study, who was looking through the animal remains.

“He called me up and said, Hello mate, you've got human remains,” Mijares says. “And I said, Really? Then we'll go grab a beer!”

In 2010, Mijares and his colleagues unveiled the 67,000-year-old fossil, which they tentatively suggested belonged to a small-bodied member of Homo sapiens, making it perhaps the oldest sign of our species anywhere in the Philippines at the time. But Mijares suspected that it might actually belong to a new species, maybe even a Luzon analog to H. floresiensis. The team needed more fossils to be sure.


Something old, something new
As luck would have it, excavations uncovered two more toe bones along with seven teeth, two finger bones, and part of a femur on return trips to Callao Cave in 2011 and 2015. In all, the remains represent at least three individuals.

The small fossils' curves and grooves reveal an unexpected mix of both ancient and more advanced traits. The teeth's small sizes and relatively simple shapes, for instance, point to a more “modern” individual, but one upper premolar has three roots—a trait found in fewer than 3 percent of modern humans. And one foot bone resembles those of the ancient australopithecines, a group that includes the famous human relative Lucy, who trekked across Africa roughly three million years ago.


Five of the seven teeth attributed to Homo luzonensis. The teeth have small sizes and relatively simple shapes, but one premolar has three roots, which is uncommon among modern humans.

“I agree with [the] authors that the combination of features is like nothing we have seen before,” says María Martinón-Torres, the director of Spain's National Research Center on Human Evolution.


New York University anthropologist Shara Bailey, an expert on ancient teeth, notes that South Africa's Homo naledi—discovered by a team including National Geographic grantee Lee Berger—also has features that look both ancient and modern. She takes the two discoveries as a sign that “mosaic” evolution was more common among hominins than once thought.

Martinón-Torres further suggests that the mix of dental features somewhat resembles that seen in 15,000-year-old hominin remains from Dushan in southern China, which she and her colleagues recently described. Along with H. luzonensis, the discoveries join recent finds hinting that by 12,000 years ago, as the Pleistocene epoch drew to a close, hominins in Asia had a startling amount of diversity.

What's in a name?
While many scientists laud the research for its thoroughness, defining a species from just 13 small bones and teeth is tricky. Though the scientists attempted to extract DNA, they were unsuccessful, as is common for samples that have stewed for millennia in the heat and humidity of tropical locales.

Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18919 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:41 pm to
Link?
Posted by Bustedsack
Member since Dec 2017
4387 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:42 pm to
Homo Threadensis
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

“He called me up and said, Hello mate, you've got human remains,” Mijares says. “And I said, Really? Then we'll go grab a beer!” 
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Link?

Its missing
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51408 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:43 pm to
FFS
Fingers broken???
Posted by Dandy Lion
Member since Feb 2010
51408 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by Pecker
Rocky Top
Member since May 2015
16674 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:46 pm to
5 star wall of text. would read again
Posted by ColoradoAg03
Denver, CO
Member since Oct 2012
6687 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:48 pm to
Oh, I thought this was going to be a question about Aggies.


Nevermind.


Carry on.
This post was edited on 4/18/19 at 6:49 pm
Posted by CyrustheVirus
Member since Jan 2013
2911 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

The hominin—identified from a total of seven teeth and six small bones


And

quote:

Defining a species from just 13 small bones and teeth is tricky. Though the scientists attempted to extract DNA, they were unsuccessful, as is common for samples that have stewed for millennia in the heat and humidity of tropical locales


So 13 bones and no DNA? In the Science world, that will fly. In the real world, that homo is flaccid.
Posted by Tunasntigers92
The Boot
Member since Sep 2014
28325 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 6:57 pm to
Denisovans
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 7:26 pm to
Anyone else bothered that the OP did not make the second name lowercase?!
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

Though the scientists attempted to extract DNA, they were unsuccessful, as is common for samples that have stewed for millennia in the heat and humidity of tropical locales. 



Someone explain please.

Isn't dna in every humanoid cell?
How about rna? Did they find that?
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Fingers broken???

Not yours.
Posted by Kentucker
Rabbit Hash, KY
Member since Apr 2013
20055 posts
Posted on 4/18/19 at 9:01 pm to
Homo erectus was a world traveler and apparently colonized huge areas in Asia. Homo luzonensis and Homo floresiensis are indicators of just how thoroughly H. erectus covered southeast Asia.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram