Started By
Message

re: Has technology made us dumber, social media made us less social?

Posted on 5/4/14 at 12:55 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295342 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 12:55 pm to
quote:


Less social: absolutely



Had this discussion with a friend back in the 90's. He felt that the internet would not change the way people interact socially. It's changed everything about the way most people who use the web interact.

Not sure if it will be a long term negative or positive but I find people more socially awkward and mimicking in real life the collective things they glean from social media.


I think technology has been awesome for education though. Used to really suck going through a card catalog and having to find books to do research.
This post was edited on 5/4/14 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61360 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

we're going to compare some stats on society from that era to today, to see which era was worse


You're shifting gears, and we've been over this many times before in selecting data we choose to argue with. I'm certainly not making the case that the 60's, 70's and 80's that I grew up in were without fault or even preferable to now in many areas, but in certain things they were, and not all of that can be broken down in a graph or statistical analysis to find the mean, mode, and standard deviation. It's found in experiences and observations through living. In some places it will be worse that others, and perhaps not as noticeable in other experiences to do with crime, extra income, etc, but I'd say this, the older you get the more you come to the realization that what builds true lasting happiness in humans isn't in how much disposable or useless shite you can buy, but in other things like life experiences, family, friends, etc that lead to a very happy and more fulfilled life. It's but a means of making something already there better not causing it to appear. IOW, a graph doesn't cause you to have an understanding of happiness. Experience in both then and now does that. Some things are much better today, and some things are a real negative effect on society from then to now. It's keeping an open mind that causes you to increase in real understanding, not statistics or graphs.

For every crime statistic you post I an quite easily give you a decrease in personal liberty, and some increases too. I can rehash the days when we didn't actually need to lock or doors, windows and equip our homes with alarm systems, and I'm sure you can post a stat that says murders have gone down, this in spite of what we see in front of our faces every day when we compare newspaper headlines then to now. Those things can be skewed to fit an agenda.

Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61360 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Less social.....as we discuss on a wide-spectrum discussion forum where such detailed discussions were not available just 15 years ago.


You perhaps weren't privy to the conversations that occurred amongst real life human beings discussing the subject with their actual mouths attached to their neck appendages.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465465 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

You're shifting gears,

well it wasn't in response to an opposing point, which is why i replied to myself

quote:

but in certain things they were, and not all of that can be broken down in a graph or statistical analysis to find the mean, mode, and standard deviation

oh...and what was i saying earlier about subjective evaluation and protecting your preferenced views?

quote:

I can rehash the days when we didn't actually need to lock or doors, windows and equip our homes with alarm systems, and I'm sure you can post a stat that says murders have gone down, this in spite of what we see in front of our faces every day when we compare newspaper headlines then to now. Those things can be skewed to fit an agenda.

yes murder is easily skewed and hidden
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138149 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:00 pm to
But those discussions are more trended toward like-minded people, thus resulting more in social conformity and groupthink.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20622 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

I'm sure you can post a stat that says murders have gone down, this in spite of what we see in front of our faces every day when we compare newspaper headlines then to now. Those things can be skewed to fit an agenda.


How do think they are skewing murder rates?
Posted by sbr2
Member since Apr 2011
15343 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:01 pm to
It's interesting that you keep bringing up the scenario where you learned life skills via playing in the cul-de-sac. It is also possible that kids today are learning different life skills via a medium not so dissimilar from your beloved example? If I had the exact same experiences of childhood that my father had then that would be stagnation, things move forward!
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465465 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

You perhaps weren't privy to the conversations that occurred amongst real life human beings discussing the subject with their actual mouths attached to their neck appendages.

since rouge's original comment replied to OML, and i have interacted with him a good bit, i can actually comment about this

OML loves movies. 15 years ago it would be impossible for him to discuss movies/shows in the way i've seen him do on here. first, his ability to know most non-mainstream movies would be very limited. second, his ability to watch these movies would be almost impossible. lastly, finding people to discuss non-mainstream movies isn't exactly easy (and was all but impossible 15 years ago)

and i know this, b/c i was in that boat 15 years ago when i was in high school and developing quite the taste for non-mainstream movies. it was very difficult to even find resources to identify these movies/shows. actually watching them and discussing them was impossible (and the internet was around then)

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295342 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Less social.....as we discuss on a wide-spectrum discussion forum where such detailed discussions were not available just 15 years ago.



You perhaps weren't privy to the conversations that occurred amongst real life human beings discussing the subject with their actual mouths attached to their neck appendages.


Conversations on a message board are impersonal. It's an electronic persona, not a person. Some social media really has helped burst my bubble about the intelligence of the average citizen.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61360 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

It's interesting that you keep bringing up the scenario where you learned life skills via playing in the cul-de-sac. It is also possible that kids today are learning different life skills via a medium not so dissimilar from your beloved example? If I had the exact same experiences of childhood that my father had then that would be stagnation, things move forward!


A more advanced digital version of what we called books.

And you're right about the access to information. That's a real positive, but the social skill depravation is the downside, as well as overweight kids that are marketed to death as well.

This post was edited on 5/4/14 at 1:05 pm
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295342 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:05 pm to
quote:


But those discussions are more trended toward like-minded people, thus resulting more in social conformity and groupthink.


Probably. I had a much higher view of humanity before the widespread availability of social media.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465465 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

as well as overweight kids that are marketed to death as well.

again, this is much more likely to be a poor child of lesser culture. the argument doesn't apply to them

they're much more immersed in your preferred social interactions b/c they do not have the same technological abilities
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20622 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

But those discussions are more trended toward like-minded people, thus resulting more in social conformity and groupthink.


The internet has definitely helped proliferate the spread of diverse thoughts and ideas. Just look at the wide range of views you see discussed in the religious threads on here. Through which medium would such discussions have occurred in the past?
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61360 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

But those discussions are more trended toward like-minded people, thus resulting more in social conformity and groupthink.


That's a decent point, but even today as then I've regularly disagreed with people and took issue with things. We just didn't let differences escalate as much perhaps, and didn't think we knew it all, so that's why we had discussions on various issues that formed our opinions on matters.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295342 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

. Through which medium would such discussions have occurred in the past?


Depends on your associations. People still associate with and read what they choose via social media today, just like people associated with those they chose to associate in the past.
Posted by Casty McBoozer
your mom's fat arse
Member since Sep 2005
35497 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:11 pm to
The populations is still growing at an alarming rate, so people must be somewhat social, you know, to the point of fricking at least.
Posted by Paige
Vice President of the OT
Member since Oct 2010
85617 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:12 pm to
Has anyone defined social?
quote:

1. pertaining to, devoted to, or characterized by friendly companionship or relations
2. seeking or enjoying the companionship of others; friendly; sociable; gregarious.
3. of, pertaining to, connected with, or suited to polite or fashionable society
says nothing about being face to face

So I think we're more social now
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
465465 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:12 pm to
wanna skype



.....naked?
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
61360 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

again, this is much more likely to be a poor child of lesser culture. the argument doesn't apply to them


God's my witness. The thought of poor black kids never even crossed my mind once. I was thinking of the pasty fat white kids today, and their parent who can't fit in their clothes anymore to then, and who I remember when they were in shape as kids too.
Posted by urinetrouble
Member since Oct 2007
20622 posts
Posted on 5/4/14 at 1:14 pm to
Yea, but now it is only a click away.

Also, people tend to be a lot more open and challenging toward others online thanks to the mask of anonymity and not having in-person relationships with others in the discussion.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram