- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fred's Bar lawsuit over patron fight death moves forward...
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:44 am to Cash
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:44 am to Cash
quote:
You know what else was reckless Sheeylli?
Your 26 y/o boyfriend getting drunk at a college bar and taking a swing at a 21 y/o student.
I wish someone would post this on her Facebook so I could watch heads explode
You’re 1000% correct
0
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:45 am to TheRouxGuru
This is such BS. Because Heaven forbid we put some personal responsibility on the 26 year old adult here.
Does the "but for" defense work here? As in he would be alive today but for his actions starting and continuing a fight?
Does the "but for" defense work here? As in he would be alive today but for his actions starting and continuing a fight?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:47 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
What gets me is Marsiglia was arrested for manslaughter.
And he didn’t even punch him. He just pushed him after the other guy threw a punch; basically passively defending himself. That’s bullshite
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:49 am to jbgleason
I hate these types of lawyers.
They are the scum of the earth.
They are the scum of the earth.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 11:57 am to jbgleason
quote:
a 26-year-old Westwego man, was in town for a friend’s bachelor party.
What 26 year old is having their bachelor party going to Fred’s?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:00 pm to slidingstop
quote:
and if the vaunted BRPD isn't standing right there, then what?
Did the fight and death occur in their parking lot, which is probably their property? I honestly don’t know. If it did then, Fred’s needs to come up with a solution. An attorney could easily and successfully arguing court that the owner of Fred’s is aware (or reasonably should have been aware ) that drunks are prone to fighting in their bar and on their property.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:02 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
If it did then, Fred’s needs to come up with a solution.
Liberal gonna liberal. Anything but accountability for the actual responsible parties.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:02 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Did the fight and death occur in their parking lot, which is probably their property? I honestly don’t know. If it did then, Fred’s needs to come up with a solution. An attorney could easily and successfully arguing court that the owner of Fred’s is aware (or reasonably should have been aware ) that drunks are prone to fighting in their bar and on their property.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 12:04 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:03 pm to LSUTANGERINE
Was that supposed to change my opinion of your post?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Maybe it's the "off the premises" language, I'm not sure.
Does "Fred's" (or whatever LLC is set up I assume) own the parking lot or do they just rent their space in the building?
There's another bar attached right? Was Reggie's back in my day if I'm remembering correctly.
If this goes anywhere based on the parking lot being part of the premises you'll probably see the property owner setting up an LLC real soon to rent the space to Fred's.. even if it's the same ownership.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:05 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Was that supposed to change my opinion of your post?
Nope, just like your response about liberals did not change my opinion of your post.
It shows that you ignored the major premise of my post
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:05 pm to Scruffy
The new contributory negligence law that just passed will likely cut down on these types of suits.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:06 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Nope, just like your response about liberals did not change my opinion of your post.
Why should the bar be responsible for two patrons fighting? That's a clown take
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:08 pm to Oilfieldbiology
Don’t be so sure of the sizable insurance policy.
A&B endorsements are expensive and sometimes rare for bars or certain types of bars like Fred’s.
Baby momma will get SS survivor benefits for the kids though.
A&B endorsements are expensive and sometimes rare for bars or certain types of bars like Fred’s.
Baby momma will get SS survivor benefits for the kids though.
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:09 pm to jbgleason
Who owns/leases the bar/building?
Who owns/leases the property?
Who holds the liability insurance policy and who is named and waived?
Who owns/leases the property?
Who holds the liability insurance policy and who is named and waived?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:10 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Why should the bar be responsible for two patrons fighting?
This will be played out in a court of law. Not a message board. Like I said, it will be argued in court that if it occurred on their property, the owner knew or should have known that drunks are prone to violent fights on their property.
To be clear. I believe the dead drunk bears responsibility for his actions. A jury might decide that the owner of Fred is responsible for X percent,
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:12 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
This will be played out in a court of law
Wild take, nostradamus.
quote:
A jury might decide that the owner of Fred is responsible for X percent,
Why though?
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:12 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Why though?
I already said why three times. Hint, it’s in part of the posts that you continually ignore.
This post was edited on 8/12/25 at 12:13 pm
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:14 pm to The Torch
quote:
FRED's has Insurance and Deep Pockets
Ding Ding Ding
Let the insurance and lawyers fight this out
Posted on 8/12/25 at 12:15 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I already said why three times. Hint, it’s in part of the posts that you continually ignore.
You are saying they are responsible. I'm asking you why two morons fighting should be their responsibility. All you've essentially said is "because" with no actual reasoning.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News