Started By
Message

re: Flu Vaccination Pole/Discussion of why or why not

Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:01 am to
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22035 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Yea, frick a doctor's opinion. This random fricknut from SJW-University says they don't know what they're talking about.


Lets use some historical perspective here. How many doctors over the last several decades recommended low fat diets to prevent heart disease? They were completely wrong.

Was that the doctors faults? No. It wasn't their expertise. Their job is to diagnose and treat symptoms. They are not whole health experts nor root cause experts.

So how did doctors come to recommend such a deadly diet so consistently? They were trained to do it. Where did this bad advice originate from? The early studies into heart disease had scientists paid off to blame heart disease on fat and not sugar. These studies were the basis for horrible doctor recommendations for decades.

Sadly, it would be nice if we could blindly trust our doctors but that just isn't reality. They are not perfect.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89070 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:02 am to
So I should blindly trust you instead just because they happened to be wrong occasionally? Sounds like a winning strategy.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22035 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:03 am to
quote:

And I guess ignore the CDC(whose guidelines are what many places go by)....who still recommends pregnant women get the flu shot.


Everyone should ignore the CDC. They have been caught in cahoots with pharma and destroying studies that didn't provide the right outcome. The CDC is not the place to go to for public safety concerns.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:03 am to
quote:

notsince98


Again, the CDC recommends flu shots for pregnant women.

Again, your articles are absolute speculation.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Everyone should ignore the CDC.


Oh frick, you're a chemtrailer aren't you?

And I bet you're worried about the fluoride in the water.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22035 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:04 am to
quote:

CDC knows a thing or two about vaccines and they recommend the flu shot for pregnant women.


They recommend it with no basis. There are ZERO safety studies on the flu shot and pregnant women. Don't fall for the title. Study the science.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22035 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:06 am to
quote:

So I should blindly trust you instead just because they happened to be wrong occasionally? Sounds like a winning strategy.


Trust me how? I'm not blindly telling anyone to do anything other than look into it and not just trust the CDC or doctors.

I'll never tell someone to avoid a vaccine (other than the flu shot due to toxicity) but people shouldn't blindly follow anyone.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89070 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:07 am to
quote:

Trust me how?
quote:

(other than the flu shot due to toxicity)


Yea, pass on your advice.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22035 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Again, the CDC recommends flu shots for pregnant women.


Based on no science.

My articles were not speculation. The doctor from johns hopkins clearly outlined the toxic elements of the recent flu shots and the article also had a link to the study of the adjuvant linking it with mental issues.

There is no denying the vaccine contains KNOWN toxins. There is no denying there is no known efficacy of the flu shot.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22035 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:09 am to
quote:

And I bet you're worried about the fluoride in the water.


CNN recently had a story about the dangers of pregnent women drinking water with fluoride in it.

I'd also suggest researching the difference between calcium-fluoride (the good) vs what fluoride is used that you are consuming.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89070 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:11 am to
quote:

CNN recently had a story about the dangers of pregnent women drinking water with fluoride in it.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:13 am to
quote:

CNN recently had a story about the dangers of pregnent women drinking water with fluoride in it.



Holy shite, I was kidding.

Dude.
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7155 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:17 am to
quote:

quote:
Trust me how?
quote:
(other than the flu shot due to toxicity)


Yea, pass on your advice.


Think the name
quote:

notsince98
is missing a few letters/has the wrong letters...
Nonsense98 or notscience98 would be more fitting.

However, while I don't agree with most of the statements from this poster, I have also not read any comments or had any of my own experiences that would convince me to get a flu Vaccination. I think it's one of those things that is a case by case basis on the individual. Some people never get vaccinated and also never get the flu. There are people that get vaccinated and also never get the flu. Then there are some who get vaccinated and sometimes get the flu. Haha I can't imagine there are some who never get vaccinated and always get the flu though.

I fall into the first category, until last year when I got the flu. That is why I started this thread in hopes that I would be strongly convinced one way or the other. Since my personal case of the flu last year was so minor...I'm still learning more on the side to not get the vaccination.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:27 am to
quote:

notsince98


What is your opinion on jet fuel and steel beams?
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
53509 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:30 am to
Why was this thread anchored?
Posted by lsunurse
Member since Dec 2005
129146 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:47 am to
It was anchored because of the short thread title
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7155 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 9:54 am to
quote:

It was anchored because of the short thread title


It was short, but also met subject requirements I thought. Can I edit the subject and it be unanchored?
Posted by Murtown
OT Ballerville
Member since Sep 2014
1784 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 10:18 am to
I've had the flu three times, all three times I got it, I had taken the flu shot. I have never gotten the flu without taking the flu shot.

I have taken the flu shot and not gotten the flu.

I no longer get a flu shot.

Take from this what you will.
Posted by PaperDoll
The Swamp
Member since Sep 2012
30 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 11:19 am to
CDC funded Study just released a finding of "hint" of connection between flu shots and miscarriage: flu vacc/miscarriage

CDS' response to findings: CDC response

Possible link would be enough for me to say no.
This post was edited on 9/21/17 at 11:20 am
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram