- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Families of Aurora, CO theater shooting victims suing the theater
Posted on 9/1/16 at 10:48 am to Fewer Kilometers
Posted on 9/1/16 at 10:48 am to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
So the survivors who sued will have to repay Cinemark $700k for bringing suit and losing.
Only the four that refused to settle.
quote:
But before that deadline, the settlement would collapse and four survivors of the massacre would be ordered to pay the theater chain more than $700,000.
quote:
The plaintiffs and their attorneys all seemed to agree. They decided on a split of $30,000 each to the three most critically injured survivors. The remaining 38 plaintiffs would equally share the remaining $60,000.
Attorneys with Cinemark drafted a news release to distribute the next day.
Then one plaintiff rejected the deal. Her suffering had been profound: Her child was killed in the shooting, she was left paralyzed and the baby she was carrying had been lost.
Weaver’s vision briefly blurred. The eight hours they had spent negotiating the deal, the weeks of the failed state court trial, the four years of anger at the theater since the shooting — all of it was for nothing.
“It was done then,” Weaver said.
He removed himself as a plaintiff immediately. So did 36 other people. Four plaintiffs remained on the case the next day, June 24, when Jackson handed down the order that Cinemark was not liable for the damages.
LINK
One of them on the hook is the paralyzed lady who lost her daughter and her unborn baby in the shooting. Get her, Cinemark!
Posted on 9/1/16 at 11:02 am to Cosmo
quote:
Pathetic. Something bad happens to a loved one and you want to get paid.
If we didn't have as many lawyers we wouldn't have as many of these types of of lawsuits.
Posted on 9/1/16 at 11:08 am to tigerpimpbot
quote:
Get her, Cinemark!
you realize it's not Cinemark, but state law that automatically does this right?
Posted on 9/1/16 at 11:15 am to 3nOut
quote:
you realize it's not Cinemark, but state law that automatically does this right?
You realize Cinemark does not have to pursue the claim, right? It's not compulsory. They filed the motion requesting the court to award the fees and costs.
Popular
Back to top


1





